Skip to main content

Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always

  1. I am genuinely interested in hearing what other people have to say. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALWAYS
  2. I have a good command of the skills needed to draw people out (e.g., warmth, active listen-ing skills, etc.). Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALWAYS
  3. I have a strong and positive sense of who I am, and I am confident in my abilities. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  4. I have a good sense of humor, and I know how to use it appropriately—meaning, never at someone else’s expense. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  5. I plan well and I take pride in my organizational abilities. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: RARELY
  6. I can be trusted to hold information confidentially. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALWAYS
  7. I maintain a high level of integrity in my dealings with others. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALWAYS
  8. I am comfortable in managing interpersonal situations that are complex. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: RARELY
  9. Being around people who are expressing strong emotions—anger, sadness, joy—doesn’t make me unduly uncomfortable. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  10. I approach my work with people with enthusiasm and considerable positive energy. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  11. I think of myself as a kind person. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALWAYS
  12. I am assertive in my relations with others. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  13. I am adept at managing conflict. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  14. I think that people enjoy being around me, and I enjoy being with people. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST
  15. I am able to work well with diverse (e.g., racial, ethnic, religious) groups of people. Rarely 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always Comments: ALMOST

 

Review your responses to this inventory. Take a little time with this, as you think about your personal strengths and areas for attention and growth that will affect your work as a group leader. Take stock of those items that strike you as most revealing. What implications does this review have for the kinds of groups you might be most naturally suited for leading?As you look at this inventory and your responses, which questions seem to you to reflect attributes that you can work on to improve, and which seem to simply reflect characteristics of who you are as a person, things that will remain essen-tially the same?Discuss your reflections with two to three of your colleagues, and hear about theirs, as well. Does any of this discussion affect any of the ways you perceive your own strengths and areas for needed growth? Then widen the discussion to include the larger group.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom