Faculty of Science and Engineering
Advanced Geotechnical Engineering Dam Design Project – Marking Criteria |
Marks | Marks |
Overall report & submission | 05 |
(i) Neat, clear, and well organized report with completed | |
cover page (20%) | |
(ii) All student should complete “Dam Design | |
Project _Peer Assessment” (40%) | |
(iii)Give the geometry of the earth dam cross section | |
showing all dimensions (20%) | |
(iv) Give a table to summarise properties of earth dam | |
materials used in the design (20%) |
|
SEEP/W analysis of the dam for steady-state seepage when | 15 |
upstream water is at the service level (question 1 in the | |
problem) | |
(i) Provide co-ordinates of points used to model the dam | |
geometry in SEEP/W (20%) | |
(ii) Show FEM model to indicate different material | |
regions and boundary conditions used (20%) | |
(iii)Tabulate values of material properties used for each | |
region and type of boundary conditions used to define | |
the problem (provide any values applied to | |
boundaries if applicable) (20%) | |
(iv) After analysing, provide model dam (FEM model) to | |
show the flux value in the flux section (20%) | |
(v) Accurately calculate the total seepage loss in the | |
reservoir per year in m3 (show all necessary | |
calculations) (20%) |
|
Using SEEP/W results, determination of the total head and | 5 |
pore-water pressure at Points “A” and “B” under steady-state | |
conditions with upstream water at the service level (question | |
2 in the problem) |
(i) | Calculate the co-ordinates of points “A” and “B” |
showing all necessary calculations (20%) | |
(ii) | Obtain the most appropriate total head values at |
Points “A” and “B” (40%) | |
(iii) | Obtain the most appropriate pore-water values at |
Points “A” and “B” (40%) |
|
Verification of FEM (SEEP/W) results (question 3 in the | 20 |
problem) | |
(i) | Provide two flow nets chosen to show flow lines |
and equipotential lines (10%) | |
(ii) | For each flow net, clearly show how to calculate |
the total seepage loss accurately using Darcy’s | |
equation for 2D seepage (25%) | |
(iii) | For each flow net, clearly show how to calculate |
the total head at “A” and “B” accurately (25%) | |
(iv) | For each flow net, clearly show how to calculate |
pore-water pressure at “A” and “B” accurately | |
using Bernoulli’s equation (25%) | |
(v) | Compare SEEP/W values with calculated values |
and provide three possible reasons for any | |
deviation (15%) |
|
Estimation of optimum saturated permeability for the core of | 5 |
the dam (question 4 in the problem) | |
(i) | Choose four appropriate saturated permeability |
values for the dam core material (20%) | |
(ii) | For each permeability value chosen for the dam |
core, estimation of seepage loss per year in m3 per | |
1m length of dam using flux values in each | |
SEEP/W analysis (40%) | |
(iii) | Plot the seepage loss (m3/year/m) with the |
saturated permeability coefficient of the dam core | |
and determine the optimum saturated permeability | |
value for the dam core material (40%) |
Faculty of Science and Engineering
reservoir water is at the overtopping level(question 5 in the |
problem) |
(i) Give FEM model and indicate the change made boundary conditions of FEM model used in question 1 in the problem (20%) (ii) After analysing, provide model dam (FEM model) to show the flux value in the flux section (20%) (iii) Accurately calculate the total seepage loss in the reservoir per year in m3 (show all necessary calculations) (20%) (iv) Obtain the total head and pore-water pressure at point “A” and “B” from the results of seepage analysis using SEEP/W (20%) (v) Compare the total seepage loss, total head at A & B, and pore-water pressure at A & B when the reservoir water is at service level (question 1&2) and at overtopping level (question 5) and give reasons for differences (20%) |
just after construction (question 6 in the problem) | |
(i) | Give SLOPE/W model showing boundary |
conditions, material zones (regions), entry and | |
exit zones chosen for trial failure surfaces | |
considered for both upstream and downstream | |
slopes, tabulate material properties used for each | |
region (20%) | |
(ii) | Estimate the minimum FOS using Morgenstern |
Price, Bishop’s simplified, Janbu’s simplified, | |
Spencer, and Fellenious (Ordinary) methods for | |
upstream and provide details (graphically) of |
Faculty of Science and Engineering
method, compare the minimum FOSs obtained | |
from different method and discuss the reasons for | |
differences (40%) | |
(iii) | Estimate the minimum FOS using Morgenstern |
Price, Bishop’s simplified, Janbu’s simplified, | |
Spencer, and Fellenious (Ordinary) methods for | |
downstream and tabulate the values. Graphically | |
show all the trial surfaces considered for | |
Morgenstern-Price method and one with the | |
minimum FOS (30%) | |
(iv) | Provide three recommendations to increase the |
FOS of dam slopes during/after construction | |
(10%) |
|
The long-term stability of downstream slope under steady- | 15 |
state seepage (question 7 in the problem) | |
(i) | Give SLOPE/W model showing boundary |
conditions, material zones (regions), entry and | |
exit zones chosen for trial failure surfaces | |
considered for both service and overtopping water | |
levels, tabulate material properties used for each | |
region (20%) | |
(ii) | For the service water level of the reservoir, |
estimate the minimum FOS using Morgenstern | |
Price, Bishop’s simplified, Janbu’s simplified, | |
Spencer, and Fellenious (Ordinary) methods for | |
downstream and provide details (graphically) of | |
failure surface with minimum FOS for each | |
method (30%) | |
(iii) | For the overtopping water level of the reservoir, |
estimate the minimum FOS using Morgenstern | |
Price, Bishop’s simplified, Janbu’s simplified, | |
Spencer, and Fellenious (Ordinary) methods for |
Faculty of Science and Engineering
show all the trial surfaces considered for | |
Morgenstern-Price method and one with the | |
minimum FOS (40%) | |
(iv) | Provide three recommendations to increase the |
FOS of downstream of the dam under steady-state | |
seepage conditions (20%) |
|
The stability of upstream slope during/after sudden | 10 |
drawdown of reservoir water level (question 8 in the | |
problem) | |
(i) | Give SLOPE/W model showing boundary |
conditions, material zones (regions), entry and | |
exit zones chosen for trial failure surfaces | |
considered upstream slope stability for sudden | |
drawdown, tabulate material properties used for | |
each region (20%) | |
(ii) | Selection of four drawdown levels, estimate |
minimum FOS for each drawdown level using | |
Morgenstern-Price method, provide details | |
(graphically) of the failure surface with minimum | |
FOS for each drawdown level (40%) | |
(iii) | For each drawdown level, graphically (plotting a |
graph) show how the FOS change over 30 days | |
after sudden drawdown (20%) | |
(iv) | Plot a graph between minimum FOS and |
drawdown levels determine the safest drawdown | |
level (20%) | |
Total | 100 |
-
- Assignment status: Resolved by our Writing Team
- Source@PrimeWritersBay.com
Comments
Post a Comment