Skip to main content

evidence gathering process to ensure

Referencing Styles : Open

Conducting the assessment

• Establish and oversee the evidence gathering process to ensure remains valid, reliable, fair and flexible

• Advise the student when to commence the assessment

• Observe the student undertake the tasks as outlined

• Record your observations in the assessor checklist

• Where a checklist point is not observed due to an inappropriate environment, or for a reason outside the students control, modify the scenario to allow the student an opportunity to perform the associated task

• Where a checklist point is not appropriate, write “N/A” in the space provided

• Gather supporting documentation where available and appropriate (as evidence)

• Incorporate allowable adjustments to the assessment procedure without compromising the integrity of the assessment

• Do not interfere with the assessment unless the students actions impose a risk to themselves or anyone else

• If a student performs an action incorrectly, mark it as such.  Record what you see, not what you want to see.

• Once the assessment is complete, advise the student that the assessment has ceased, and record your comments in the sections provided

 

For this task, you are to evaluate the organisational development plan’s strategies you or another colleague developed whilst undertaking the unit – BSBMGT615A – Contribute to organisational development.

 

This plan will:

• Confirm your business or organisations vision and mission;

• Include relevant organisational values

• Identify and consider strengths and weaknesses of existing and potential competitors and allies

•Analyse organisation’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats through a detailed SWOT analysis

• Document relevant research and background for inclusion in the organisational plan’s strategies

• Formulate strategic objectives and strategies needed for the future

• Detail each strategy with an assigned priority, a timeframe, responsible parties and measurable performance indicators

• Provide for due diligence

 

Your aim is to identify any change requirements / opportunities that can be established within your business.

 

You will also need to

• Review the existing policies and procedures against the organisational development plan’s strategies

• Monitor the trends within your external environment

• Consider performance gaps / business opportunities or threats / or management opportunities

• Review and prioritise all change requirements

 



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning
Post a Comment
Read more

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom
Post a Comment
Read more