Skip to main content

CNA340

Assessment one Marking Rubric

Assessment Criteria HD DN CR PP NN
Criterion one: 30%
You provide a
descriptive and
professional account of
a situation within one
of the categories
provided above below
Categories:
– professional
communication,
– accountability
– Person-centred
care.		 You have provided an
eloquent and highly
professional account of
a situation relating to
one of the categories.
The context is well
defined and described.		 You have provided a
detailed descriptive
and professional
account of a situation
relating to one of the
categories.
Context is clear.		 You have provided a
descriptive and
professional account of
a situation relating to
one of the categories
outlined.
Context is mostly clear.		 You have provided a
basic description and
mostly professional
account of a situation
relating to one of the
categories outlined.		 You have not provided
an adequate
description of a
situation from PEP.
The topic is unrelated
to any of the
categories.
Your description is
unprofessional or
inappropriate.
Criterion two: 20%
You demonstrate the
ability to reflect in and
on action.		 You have
demonstrated strong
reflective capacity in
both domains:
reflection-in-action
and refection-on
action.		 You have
demonstrated good
reflective capacity in
both domains:
reflection-in-action
and refection-on
action.		 You have
demonstrated
reflective capacity in
both domains, with
one domain showing
stronger skills.		 You have
demonstrated
beginning level
reflective abilities in
both domains.		 You have not
demonstrated your
ability to reflect during
practice and after
practice OR you have
only addressed one
domain.
Criterion three: 40%
You demonstrate the
ability to draw upon
critical reflection (25%)
to inform individual
practice priorities to		 You have
demonstrated strong
critical reflection
through sound
reasoning and enquiry
that underpins deep		 You have
demonstrated
effective critical
reflection with good
reasoning and enquiry
through a deeper		 You have
demonstrated critical
reflection with
beginning level
reasoning through a		 You have provided an
event summary rather
than a critical
reflection.		 You have not
demonstrated your
ability to utilise critical
reflection.

 

inform your
professional
development
(15%)		 critical analyses of your
situation.
You have provided
strong evidence of
synthesis of ideas and
insights gained.		 analysis of the
situation.
You have provided
some evidence of
synthesis of ideas and
insights gained.		 basic analysis of the
situation.		 What you have drawn
on is illogical and does
not link to any
individual practice
priorities.
Critical reflection has
directly, clearly and
logically informed your
practice priorities.
Your professional
development values
are clear and well
emphasised.		 Critical reflection has
clearly informed your
practice priorities.
Your professional
development values
are well expressed.		 Critical reflection has
informed practice
priorities towards your
professional
development.		 You have
demonstrated some
reflection to guide a
practice priority.
Practice priority (s) are
limited to one domain
and or/mostly clear.
Your professional
development within
this context is mostly
clear.		 Your reflection omits
clear practice
priorities.
Your reflection does
not link to your
professional
development
adequately.
Criterion four: 10%
You use sound and
professional written
academic skills. Any
referencing aligns with
the Harvard style as
preferred by UTAS		 Your academic writing
is at a high level with
strong evidence of
planning.
Discussion is
consistently expressed
in a clear and fluent
manner; grammar,
punctuation and
syntax are error free.		 Your academic writing
is at a high level of
with evidence of
planning.
Discussion is
consistently expressed
in a clear and fluent
manner, with very few
or minor errors of
grammar, syntax or
punctuation.		 You communicated in
academic writing by
using coherent and
cohesive planning.
Discussion is mainly
clear and fluent, some
errors of grammar/
syntax/punctuation are
present but do not
affect clarity of
meaning.		 You communicated in
academic writing by
using coherent and
partly cohesive
expression.
Discussion is mainly
clear but errors of
grammar / syntax /
punctuation are
present and may affect
the flow of writing.		 The clarity of your
paper is hindered by
poor structure, poor
grammar, and
structure (little
evidence of planning).
If references used:
Inaccurate/poor
referencing style or
does not use the
Harvard style.

 

If references used:
Accurately referenced
all sources using the
Harvard style, without
error in-text or in list.		 If references used:
Accurately referenced
all sources using the
Harvard style; minor
errors in-text or in list.		 If references used:
Accurately referenced
the majority of sources
using the Harvard style
both in-text and in list.		 If references used:
Accurately referenced
most sources using the
Harvard style guide OR
more references
needed in places.

 



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning
Post a Comment
Read more

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom
Post a Comment
Read more