CNA340

Assessment one Marking Rubric

Assessment Criteria	HD	DN	CR	PP	NN
Criterion one: 30% You provide a descriptive and professional account of a situation within one of the categories provided above below Categories: – professional communication, – accountability – Person-centred care.	You have provided an eloquent and highly professional account of a situation relating to one of the categories. The context is well defined and described.	You have provided a detailed descriptive and professional account of a situation relating to one of the categories. Context is clear.	You have provided a descriptive and professional account of a situation relating to one of the categories outlined. Context is mostly clear.	You have provided a basic description and mostly professional account of a situation relating to one of the categories outlined.	You have not provided an adequate description of a situation from PEP. The topic is unrelated to any of the categories. Your description is unprofessional or inappropriate.
Criterion two: 20% You demonstrate the ability to reflect in and on action.	You have demonstrated strong reflective capacity in both domains: reflection-in-action and refection-on action.	You have demonstrated good reflective capacity in both domains: reflection-in-action and refection-on action.	You have demonstrated reflective capacity in both domains, with one domain showing stronger skills.	You have demonstrated beginning level reflective abilities in both domains.	You have not demonstrated your ability to reflect during practice and after practice OR you have only addressed one domain.
Criterion three: 40% You demonstrate the ability to draw upon critical reflection (25%) to inform individual practice priorities to	You have demonstrated strong critical reflection through sound reasoning and enquiry that underpins deep	You have demonstrated effective critical reflection with good reasoning and enquiry through a deeper	You have demonstrated critical reflection with beginning level reasoning through a	You have provided an event summary rather than a critical reflection.	You have not demonstrated your ability to utilise critical reflection.

 

inform your professional development (15%)	critical analyses of your situation. You have provided strong evidence of synthesis of ideas and insights gained.	analysis of the situation. You have provided some evidence of synthesis of ideas and insights gained.	basic analysis of the situation.	What you have drawn on is illogical and does not link to any individual practice priorities.
Critical reflection has directly, clearly and logically informed your practice priorities. Your professional development values are clear and well emphasised.	Critical reflection has clearly informed your practice priorities. Your professional development values are well expressed.	Critical reflection has informed practice priorities towards your professional development.	You have demonstrated some reflection to guide a practice priority. Practice priority (s) are limited to one domain and or/mostly clear. Your professional development within this context is mostly clear.	Your reflection omits clear practice priorities. Your reflection does not link to your professional development adequately.
Criterion four: 10% You use sound and professional written academic skills. Any referencing aligns with the Harvard style as preferred by UTAS	Your academic writing is at a high level with strong evidence of planning. Discussion is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner; grammar, punctuation and syntax are error free.	Your academic writing is at a high level of with evidence of planning. Discussion is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner, with very few or minor errors of grammar, syntax or punctuation.	You communicated in academic writing by using coherent and cohesive planning. Discussion is mainly clear and fluent, some errors of grammar/ syntax/punctuation are present but do not affect clarity of meaning.	You communicated in academic writing by using coherent and partly cohesive expression. Discussion is mainly clear but errors of grammar / syntax / punctuation are present and may affect the flow of writing.	The clarity of your paper is hindered by poor structure, poor grammar, and structure (little evidence of planning). If references used: Inaccurate/poor referencing style or does not use the Harvard style.

 

If references used: Accurately referenced all sources using the Harvard style, without error in-text or in list.

If references used: Accurately referenced all sources using the Harvard style; minor errors in-text or in list.

If references used: Accurately referenced the majority of sources using the Harvard style both in-text and in list.

If references used: Accurately referenced most sources using the Harvard style guide OR more references needed in places.

 

• • Assignment status: Resolved by our Writing Team
  • Source@PrimeWritersBay.com

GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

• • • • NO PLAGIARISM