you are required to use the

Unit Name/Code	ISY3003 Information Systems Project 2
Assessment Type	Project
Assessment Number	Three
Assessment Name	Working Software and User Manual
Unit Learning	LO1 to LO7
Outcomes Assessed
Due Date and Time	Week 12, Friday 5th October 2018 by 5:00PM
Presentations done (In Class)
Weighting	40%
Assessment	Tasks
Description
Summary:
A. Working Software	20%
B. User Manual	10%
C. Presentation	10%

D. Peer Review Form
READ THE GROUP WORK GUIDELINES IN APPENDIX 1
A. Working Software
Building on Assignment 2, you are required to use the feedback to
improve your application. As well as the fully functional client side
GUI prototype, you will need to extend your working software to
be able to read and write data.
[I suggest that you use JS to access the browser API for client side
data storage – see Tutorial Week 9. Your choice to use either client
side storage or use Node.JS to connect to a document based DB
such as MongoDB.]
B. User Manual
The User Documentation should not exceed ten (10) A4 sides, and
should enable a moderately computer-literate user, initially
completely unfamiliar with the system, to understand and fully utilise
its functionality. Feel free to use screen shots in the user manual.
C. Presentation
The allocated time for the presentation is 20 minutes. Each student in
the group should participate. The presentation should include the
following:
1. Brief overview of the context for the project. What were the
key deliverables, in business terms for the project? What are
the major use cases?
2. Brief recap of the client side GUI and a discussion of bug
fixes and improvements made since the Assignment 2
submission.
Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au
3. Demonstration on how the app uses data – app needs to
be able to read and write data.
4. No need to mention the user manual.
5. The lecturer will require a STAPLED hard copy to assist
with review.
D. Peer Review Form
The attached Peer Review Form needs to be completed
and submitted by EACH team member.
Detailed Submission
Requirements
Before submission, you ensure the submitted work satisfies the
following requirements:
The working software is to be submitted as a zipped Intel XDK
project, through a Moodle assignment submission tool, by one
group member by the due date and time.
For the User Manual, this is a Turnitin Group Report. One team
member is to submit for the group by the due date and time, as a
PDF file. If more that one person submits then both submissions
will come up with 100% plagiarism!
Include a cover sheet with the User Manual (additional to the
maximum 10 pages) that has the name of all group members,
subject, date, assignment and word count.
The presentation is to be submitted as an MS PowerPoint file by
one group member by the due date and time.
The Peer Review Form is a Turnitin Report in PDF format.
The usual 5% penalty per day, or part thereof, will apply to late
submissions.
Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au
Marking Criteria
There are FIVE standards for this deliverable (and 6 marks available for each):
1. Correctness – whether deliverable functions according to what was presented in Assignment 1 and 2 in
ISY3002 Project I class.
2. Usability – whether deliverable is sufficiently usable for the target users, without the need for extensive training.
3. Sophistication – the standard to which deliverable demonstrates technological complexity and the application
of the technology taught in the workshops
4. Creativity – the standard to which deliverable demonstrates creativity in delivering the solution to the
problem proposed
5. Data Handling – the standard to which the deliverable can read and write data
The standards are as follows:

Very Good to Excellent Implementation	(32 to 40 marks)
– Exhibiting all the required functionality in a highly usable, sophisticated and creative manner. Few, if any, faults in
the code. Good Implementation	(20 to 31 marks)

– Exhibits most of the required functionality, reasonably usable, with a lack of sophistication and creativity. Some
minor faults in the code.
Incomplete Implementation (0 to 19 marks)
– Exhibits only a partial functionality, with poor usability and numerous faults.
Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au

Unit Name/Code	ISY3003 Information Systems Project 2
Assessment Type	Practical and Documentation
Assessment Number	Three
Assessment Name	Peer Review Form
Unit Learning	LO1 to LO6
Outcomes Assessed
Due Date and Time	Week 6, Friday, 26th January, 2018 by 5:00PM
Weighting	Mandatory
Assessment	Each student is to complete the Peer Review Form below and
Description	submit through the Moodle Assignment tool.
If there are problems with your group, don’t wait until the
week of submission. Email or talk to the lecturer.
There is an EMERGENCY PROCEDURE. If a team member
feels he or she does not want to be part of their group, or vice
versa, then I can provide for this individual to do the entire
Report as an individual assignment.
Detailed Submission	Submit the attached file as an MS Word of PDF file.
Requirements

Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au
Peer Evaluation Form
Use this form to rate the members of your assignment group. Your rating is meant to reflect the
overall contribution of the person to your group’s work. The BEST is 10 and the WORST is 1.
Each member of the group must complete a rating form.

YOUR NAME	YOUR STUDENT	YOUR RATING OF YOURSELF
NUMBER
What components did
you substantially
contribute to?
MEMBER’S NAME	YOUR RATING OF THEM
Comments:

Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au
APPENDIX 1
Equal Contribution of Group Members
It will be assumed that all group members contribute equally and hence will receive
the same mark for the group part of the assignment. You are required to complete the
Peer Review Form. This can be downloaded as a Word file and submitted individually by all
group members through the Moodle assignment submission tool.

If you consider that a group member has not contributed significantly, then you can
nominate that person in the form.



If you do not want to list the name of that student, you should contact your lecturer directly
and inform him.
 

Each member of the group should complete and submit a Peer Review Form.
A common problem encountered with students is that some members of groups do not contribute
sufficiently. This includes not attending the weekly workshop/laboratory sessions. If a member of
any group is not acting in a responsible manner, please attempt to resolve the problem with the
student in question in a mature, adult fashion.
If such a course of action fails, it is the duty of the group to email to the lecturer so that
alternative assessment arrangements can be made. If the problem is not outlined in writing to the
lecturer before the end of Week 10, the group will have to live with the problem. The final
decision about assessment will rest with the lecturer. In extreme cases this will involve the noncontributing student(s) undertaking all of the group assessment tasks individually.
Example of Team Ground Rules
Our attitude and culture
We treat each other with respect.
We aim to develop personal relationships to enhance trust and open communication.
We value constructive feedback. We avoid being defensive and give constructively
(positive and task-focused)
We treat all team members equally
We strive to recognize and celebrate individual and team accomplishments.
As team members, we will pitch in to help where necessary to help solve problems and catchup on behind schedule work.
Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au
Team meetings
We will hold a regular weekly meetings, either in person or on the course discussion board
(or other)
We will organise additional meetings if critical issues arise.
All team members are expected to attend team meetings unless they are out of town,
on holidays or sick.
The team leader can cancel or reschedule a team meeting if sufficient team members
are unavailable or there is insufficient subject matter to meet about.
The team leader will publish the meeting agenda 24 hours before the meeting.
Meetings will start promptly and all members are expected to be on time.
The recorder will keep an action list, and allocate each action to a team member.
Responsibilities for actions arising from meetings must be agreed to by the individual(s)
concerned.
Meeting minutes will be distributed within 24 hours after the meeting.
Communication and Decision-Making
One person talks at a time; there are no side discussions
Each person is given a chance to speak their mind while at the same time respecting the
group’s time and the meeting timetables. We will be brief and focus on facts, not opinions.
We will be open and honest about our interests and position.
We will address issues and will not accept attacks on team members as people.
We will listen, be non-judgmental and keep an open mind on issues until it is time to
decide. We accept that each team member deserves to be heard
We will seek group consensus for all important issues.
We will reach agreement and commit to explicit team objectives.
We will follow the team plan and schedule for completing tasks.
If a team member is asked to do something outside of their nominated tasks, they will inform
the team leader.
When we raise an issue or a problem, we will also try to present a solution.
Team commitments shouldn’t be made lightly, but we will keep those that we do.
Other
We will focus sufficient time on team process and conduct process checks when one
member believes we are deviating from our ground rules.
NB: This ground rules example was adapted from an NPD Solutions document, viewed 20 March
2009, <https://ift.tt/2oDz4u8
Australian Institute of Higher Education
CRICOS Provider Code: 03147A
Level 3 & 4 545 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
T: +612 9020 8050 W: www.aih.nsw.edu.au

The post you are required to use the appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.

• • Assignment status: Resolved by our Writing Team
  • Source@PrimeWritersBay.com

GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

• • • • NO PLAGIARISM