Skip to main content

This assessment is designed

1 | P a g e
ASSESSMENT 3
BUS707
Applied Business Research
T2 2018
ASSESSMENT 3: Structured Literature Review – 25%
This assessment is designed to allow students to identify relevant sources for their research and undertake
review on a theoretical concepts/constructs that has real world business implications. This assessment relates
to Learning Outcomes a, b and d
This article collections and structured review set a basis for literature review section of Research Proposal in
Assessment 4.
Following consultation with the lecturer or tutor, the students research the field to find four academic articles
relating to the research topic as proposed in Assessment 2. The articles
must be from 2010 onwards, and all
articles must be full papers (not research note or book reviews) sourced from refereed academic journals.
Note: Other than in exceptional circumstances, Assessment 3 will set the foundation for literature review
of Assessment 4. PRIOR to its inclusion in Assessment 4 Research Proposal, students will be expected
to make appropriate adjustments if recommended in feedback.
The structured literature review should addresses the following information:
1. Brief summary of the theory and progression in the field (i.e how has the theory developed)
2. Common themes/findings across the four articles
3. Different themes/findings across the four articles
4. Managerial implication of the four articles
5. Study limitations and future research direction proposed in the four articles.
Submission Details
Individual Assessment
Word limit: 1500 words (±10%) (excluding reference list)
You need to state the word count of the assessment on the cover page.
The review should be professionally presented using proper headings and sub-headings, in Arial 10pt
or Times New Roman 12pt, single space. Harvard (Anglia) style referencing.

2 | P a g e
Submission deadline Week 7 – Saturday 1 September 2018, by 11.59pm
Softcopy to be uploaded on Turnitin via Moddle links
Late penalties and extensions:
An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is
the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as inclass quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty. Penalty
for written assessment is
– 5% of the total available marks per calendar day unless an extension is
approved
Applying for extension:
If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they
must apply by completing the appropriate
Application for Extension form available from the Student
Information Centre
in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Market
St and Kent St), as soon as possible but no later than
three (3) working days of the assessment due
date. The completed form must be emailed
with supporting documentation to
academic@koi.edu.au.Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension
request as soon as practicable
. Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an
extension must be supplied.
Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted,
and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension
.
Marks out of 20 will be awarded based on how well the following criteria is addressed:

Criteria % Marks
Present brief summary of the theory and discussion of progression in the
field
20%
Identify and discuss common and different themes across the four articles 20%
Identify and discuss managerial implication of the four articles 20%
Discuss the limitation of each of articles and how the limitation differ across
the four articles, as well as identify future research direction suggested by
the articles.
20%
Apply relevant skills and knowledge of research, the wider context of the
problem and the inter-relationships between them;
10 %
Present the information in a professional manner with correct
referencing
10 %

A full Marking Rubric will be provided in Moodle.

The post This assessment is designed appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom