Skip to main content

Merger Madness weaves

Unit 6 [GB590: Ethics in Business and Society]
September 2017 Page 1 of 3
Assignment: Merger Madness
In this Assignment, you will be assessed by the following outcome:
GB590-4:
Critique ethical decision making within the context of corporate social responsibility.
GENERAL OVERVIEW: Merger Madness weaves together ethical dilemmas from six typical business
disciplines: Contracts (NDA agreements), governance (business model), management (workplace
conditions), marketing (paid placement), IT (privacy), and corporate citizenship (culture and
copyright).
You are the CEO of a start-up whose board has determined that you must accept one of two offers
for merger. After the acquisition dance, with whom will you be dancing the last dance?
To resolve each dilemma, you will answer a series of questions that will help you analyze the problem
and practice identifying and using different ethical perspectives. Then you can use all of the
viewpoints when making a final decision. The exercise has several elements:
1.
Introductory pages: Each exercise has between 1 and 4 introductory pages. These pages outline
the learning objectives, provide additional background on ethical decision making, and set the
stage for the task ahead.
2.
Multiple-choice questions: The overarching story line is presented through short conversations
among the different characters in the exercise. Each character has a particular ethical perspective
as well as a level of ethical maturity and perspective. These questions are designed to have one
right answer: Were you able to accurately determine which analytical or ethical perspective the
speaker was using in the conversation? The
Overview of the Four Ethical Lenses, in the menu of
the exercise, provides a quick reference guide demonstrating the differences among the ethical
lenses.
3.
Mastery bar: At the top of each page is a status bar that indicates correct and incorrect answers.
You cannot complete the exercise until all questions are answered correctly. At the bottom of the
mastery page is a feature that allows you to print out the questions and correct answers. For the
final exercise, the status bar serves to track which of the two companies you favor as you move
toward a final decision.
4.
Iterations: Merger Madness presents five exercises. Each exercise includes multiple questions.
You must complete every question, making notes of what you answered correctly or incorrectly.
When all the questions have been answered, you will have the opportunity to go through the
questions again, making corrections where appropriate. Your grade is based on how many times
you had to go through the questions to assure all the answers were right.
5.
Grading rubric: Upon completion, a grade will be assigned based on the number of iterations
required. This applies to Merger Madness one through four.
6.
Discussion: You will use the memo template provided in Course Resources, and transfer the
memo written in the Ethics Game to it. That memo in template form will be submitted to the
Discussion Board as your initial post in Unit 6.

Unit 6 [GB590: Ethics in Business and Society]
September 2017 Page 2 of 3
View the grading rubric below. In the first four exercises, full points will be awarded if at least three
answers in each section are correct. Half the points will be awarded if only two are correct, and no
points if fewer than two are correct.

GB590 Unit 6 Assignment: Stressful Strategy
Content and Analysis Possible
Points
Points
Earned
Dragged to the Dance
Identified the values in tension within a specific ethical dilemma.
(Questions 1-5)
6
Differentiated between an ethical issue and technical issues or
business decisions within the context of a specific ethical dilemma.
(Questions 6-8)
6
Distinguished facts, inferences, and assumptions within the context of
a specific ethical dilemma. (Questions 9-12)
6
Correlated the ethical perspectives of decision makers to statements
evaluating the context of a specific ethical dilemma. (Questions 13-
16)
6
Sizing Up the Partners
Identified the ethical task assigned to each ethical lens to help discern
a path of action. (Questions 1-4)
6
Identified the characteristics of the primary ethical theories within the
context of a specific ethical dilemma. (Questions 5-7)
6
Applied the foundational values of each ethical perspective to the
problem and course of action. (Questions 8-13)
6
Correctly analyzed the choices against the key phrase for each lens.
(Questions 14-16)
6
Mastering the Jive
Determined a path of action based on the secondary ethical values
assigned to each ethical lens. (Questions 1-3)
8
Considered definition of an ethical act from the perspective of each
lens. (Questions 10-13)
8
Identified ethical vices with each lens. (Questions 14-16) 8

Unit 6 [GB590: Ethics in Business and Society]
September 2017 Page 3 of 3

The Last Dance
Determined a path of action based on the checklist for action
assigned to each ethical lens. (Questions 1-6)
8
Chose an action that meets the definition of an ethical act. (Questions
7-10)
8
Analyzed the choices against the blind spots for each lens.
(Questions 11-16)
8
Memo
Formulated a final decision based on the use of the core questions for
the fourth step of the Baird Decision Model—Being Responsible—
together with the information gained from the previous four exercises.
2
Appropriately communicated to colleagues in a memo/content. 2
Provided the ethical problem. 2
Clearly presented the values in conflict in the problem. 2
Clearly and concisely stated the reason for the decision of choice. 2
Clearly provided the ethical framework or ethical principles used to
make the decision.
2
Clearly used intellectual empathy (ability to entertain opposing views). 2
Clearly used intellectual autonomy (ability and willingness to be an
independent thinker).
2
Correctly synthesized a forward-thinking conclusion. 2
Provided context in which to build relationships with other team
members and constituents.
2
Correctly summarized what the decision means to others. 2
Appropriate use of tone in the memo to communication to colleagues. 2
Total 120

 

The post Merger Madness weaves appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom