Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March, 2018
| Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
| Trimester | T1 – 2018 |
| Unit Code | MN504 |
| Unit Title | Networked Application Management |
| Assessment Type |
Individual Assignment |
| Assessment Title |
Critical Analysis and Problem Solving in Networked Application Management |
| Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) |
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills of analysing critically, and problem solving in regard to Networked Application Management (NAM). Students will be able to complete the following ULOs: b. Apply socio-technical contexts in modern network applications and management; c. Utilise common and emerging types of middleware to design and manage networked applications; |
| Weight | 10% |
| Total Marks | 50 |
| Word limit | 1500 – 2000 |
| Due Date | 04/05/2018 11:55PM (Friday Week 7) |
| Submission Guidelines |
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. |
| Extension | If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School’s Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment |
| Academic Misconduct |
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
MN504 Networked Application Management Assignment 1 Page 2 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March 2018
Assignment Description
A report containing a complete discussion and analysis of the given topic in the required context
needs to be submitted on Moodle. The report must have following parts:
Part 1: Blockchain
The students explore network application management of Blockchain by reviewing the literature on
the internet as papers, book chapters, and independent scholarly reports by experts, and research
based videos. Students participating in the PBL are taught how to do the critical thinking for review
of literature. At least three articles related to technology supporting Blockchain need to be analysed
in depth by discussing the overall contribution, scope and limitations of each research work.
Following aspects related to Blockchain must be discussed:
| | Architecture |
| | Features |
| | Challenges |
Part 2: Applications of Blockchain
Students need to discuss at least one application in EACH of the following domains supported by
Blockchain:
| | Currency |
| | Smart contracts |
Part 3: Socio-Technical aspects
The move of traditional computing and storage to decentralised Blockchain has a social bearing on
its users and how they perceive these new applications. The socio-technical aspects of the
applications mentioned in part 2 need to be discussed in detail.
Turnitin Submission
All assignments should be submitted via Turnitin and the similarity reports should be looked at
carefully before the due-date, as students should make sure that there is no plagiarism of any type.
MN504 Networked Application Management Assignment 1 Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March 2018
Marking Criteria
| Section to be included in the report |
Description of the section | Marks |
| Introduction | Introduction of Blockchain in terms of use and popularity. Also the structure of the assignment should be discussed. |
3 |
| Part 1 | Discussion of following aspects related to Blockchain: Architecture Features Challenges |
8+ 6+ 6 =20 |
| Part 2 | Analyse and discuss at least one application EACH supported by Blockchain in the following domains: Currency Internet of Things There has to be at least 2-3 references for each application. |
7.5 * 2 =15 |
| Part 3 | Socio-technical aspects of the applications are to be discussed and analysed |
5 |
| Conclusion | Draw a conclusion of the report with complete summary of all sections |
3 |
| Reference style | Follow IEEE reference style, in text citation and complete reference list. |
4 |
| Total | 50 |
MN504 Networked Application Management Assignment 1 Page 4 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March 2018
Marking Rubric for Assignment #1: Total Marks 50
| Grade Mark |
HD 40-50 |
DI 35-39 |
CR 30-34 |
P 25-29 |
Fail <25 |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Introduction /3 |
All salient features contributing to the popularity of Blockchain are discussed and ability to think critically is demonstrated |
Some relevant features are soundly analysed. |
General features are analysed. |
Some relevant features are briefly presented. |
This is not relevant to the assignment topic. |
| Part 1 /20 |
Demonstrated excellent ability to analyse critically and sourced reference material |
Demonstrated excellent ability to analyse critically but did not source reference material appropriately |
Demonstrated some ability to analyse critically and sourced reference material appropriately |
Demonstrated little ability to analyse critically and did not source reference material appropriately |
Did not demonstrate ability to analyse critically and did not source reference material appropriately |
| Part 2 /15 |
Findings are clearly linked and well justified. Scope and limitations are provided exceptionally well |
Findings are clearly linked and justified. Scope and limitations are provided |
Findings are linked and convincing. Some scope and limitations are provided |
Findings are not linked and unjustified |
Findings are not available |
| Part 3 /5 |
All socio-technical aspects are discussed exceptionally well |
Very good discussion of most socio technical aspects |
Good discussion of some socio technical aspects |
Discussion of few socio technical aspects |
Unsatisfactory discussion of few socio technical aspects. |
| Conclusion /3 |
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments |
Consistent, logical and convincing |
Mostly consistent logical and convincing |
Adequate cohesion and conviction |
Argument is confused and disjointed |
| Reference style /4 |
Clear styles with excellent source of references. |
Clear referencing style |
Generally good referencing style |
Sometimes clear referencing style |
Lacks consistency with many errors |
The post The purpose of this assignment appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.
-
- Assignment status: Resolved by our Writing Team
- Source@PrimeWritersBay.com
GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com
Comments
Post a Comment