Skip to main content

The purpose of this assignment

Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March, 2018

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester T1 – 2018
Unit Code MN504
Unit Title Networked Application Management
Assessment
Type
Individual Assignment
Assessment
Title
Critical Analysis and Problem Solving in Networked Application Management
Purpose of the
assessment
(with ULO
Mapping)
The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills of analysing critically, and
problem solving in regard to Networked Application Management (NAM).
Students will be able to complete the following ULOs:
b. Apply socio-technical contexts in modern network applications and
management;
c. Utilise common and emerging types of middleware to design and
manage networked applications;
Weight 10%
Total Marks 50
Word limit 1500 – 2000
Due Date 04/05/2018 11:55PM (Friday Week 7)
Submission
Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title
Page.
The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body)
font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate
section headings.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration
Application must be submitted directly to the School’s Administration Officer,
in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this
application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment.
Further information is available at:
https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM
procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of
the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion
from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves
familiar with the full policy and procedure available at:
https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM
procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy
Procedure
. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity
Section in your Unit Description.

MN504 Networked Application Management Assignment 1 Page 2 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March 2018
Assignment Description
A report containing a complete discussion and analysis of the given topic in the required context
needs to be submitted on Moodle. The report must have following parts:
Part 1: Blockchain
The students explore network application management of Blockchain by reviewing the literature on
the internet as papers, book chapters, and independent scholarly reports by experts, and research
based videos. Students participating in the PBL are taught how to do the critical thinking for review
of literature. At least three articles related to technology supporting Blockchain need to be analysed
in depth by discussing the overall contribution, scope and limitations of each research work.
Following aspects related to Blockchain must be discussed:

Architecture
Features
Challenges

Part 2: Applications of Blockchain
Students need to discuss at least one application in EACH of the following domains supported by
Blockchain:

Currency
Smart contracts

Part 3: Socio-Technical aspects
The move of traditional computing and storage to decentralised Blockchain has a social bearing on
its users and how they perceive these new applications. The socio-technical aspects of the
applications mentioned in part 2 need to be discussed in detail.
Turnitin Submission
All assignments should be submitted via Turnitin and the similarity reports should be looked at
carefully before the due-date, as students should make sure that there is no plagiarism of any type.

MN504 Networked Application Management Assignment 1 Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March 2018
Marking Criteria

Section to be
included in the
report
Description of the section Marks
Introduction Introduction of Blockchain in terms of use and
popularity. Also the structure of the assignment should
be discussed.
3
Part 1 Discussion of following aspects related to Blockchain:
Architecture
Features
Challenges
8+ 6+ 6 =20
Part 2 Analyse and discuss at least one application EACH
supported by Blockchain in the following domains:
Currency
Internet of Things
There has to be at least 2-3 references for each
application.
7.5 * 2 =15
Part 3 Socio-technical aspects of the applications are to be
discussed and analysed
5
Conclusion Draw a conclusion of the report with complete summary
of all sections
3
Reference style Follow IEEE reference style, in text citation and complete
reference list.
4
Total 50

MN504 Networked Application Management Assignment 1 Page 4 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Shaleeza Sohail Moderated by: Dr Nandini Sidnal March 2018
Marking Rubric for Assignment #1: Total Marks 50

Grade
Mark
HD
40-50
DI
35-39
CR
30-34
P
25-29
Fail
<25
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Introduction
/3
All salient features
contributing to the
popularity of
Blockchain are
discussed and
ability to think
critically is
demonstrated
Some relevant
features are
soundly
analysed.
General
features are
analysed.
Some relevant
features are
briefly
presented.
This is not
relevant to the
assignment
topic.
Part 1
/20
Demonstrated
excellent ability to
analyse critically
and sourced
reference material
Demonstrated
excellent ability
to analyse
critically but did
not source
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
some ability to
analyse
critically and
sourced
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
little ability to
analyse critically
and did not
source
reference
material
appropriately
Did not
demonstrate
ability to
analyse
critically and
did not source
reference
material
appropriately
Part 2
/15
Findings are clearly
linked and well
justified. Scope
and limitations are
provided
exceptionally well
Findings are
clearly linked
and justified.
Scope and
limitations are
provided
Findings are
linked and
convincing.
Some scope
and limitations
are provided
Findings are
not linked and
unjustified
Findings are not
available
Part 3
/5
All socio-technical
aspects are
discussed
exceptionally well
Very good
discussion of
most socio
technical
aspects
Good
discussion of
some socio
technical
aspects
Discussion of
few socio
technical
aspects
Unsatisfactory
discussion of
few socio
technical
aspects.
Conclusion
/3
Logic is clear and
easy to follow with
strong arguments
Consistent,
logical and
convincing
Mostly
consistent
logical and
convincing
Adequate
cohesion and
conviction
Argument is
confused and
disjointed
Reference
style
/4
Clear styles with
excellent source of
references.
Clear
referencing
style
Generally
good
referencing
style
Sometimes clear
referencing
style
Lacks
consistency
with many
errors

 

The post The purpose of this assignment appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom