The purpose of this assignment

Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: A/Prof Savitri Bevinakoppa April 2018 1 of 4

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Unit Code	MN601
Unit Title	Network Project Management
Term, Year	T2, 2018
Assessment Type	Assignment 1, Individual.
Assessment Title	Individual case study assignment
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)	The purpose of this assignment is to build a clear understanding of project management fundamentals and their application, specifically:  demonstrate project leadership skills; identify and assess risk in designing, executing a major project;  critically reflect on current project management ethics, research, and theory and practice;
Weight	15%
Total Marks	45
Word limit	800‐1000
Due Date	Week 7, Friday, 11.55 PM.
Submission Guidelines	 A draft of the report must be submitted on Moodle by the day before the Week‐6 class, to get feedback from the tutor in Week‐6. Updated version of the report must be submitted on Moodle the day before your Week‐7 class.  The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11‐pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.  Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
Extension	 If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about‐mit/institute‐publications/policies‐ procedures‐and‐guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic Misconduct	 Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about‐mit/institute‐publications/policies‐ procedures‐and‐guidelines/Plagiarism‐Academic‐Misconduct‐Policy‐ Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

MN601 Network Project Management 2018 T2 MN601 Assignment-1 MEL SYD V1.3 2 of 4
Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder July 2018
Purpose of the assessment:
In this assessment task, you are required examine a project case and write a 800‐1000 words
(excluding references) report on the project management and ethical issues.
A case study of a novice project manager
By Patricia E Lindsey, and Scott W Kramer.
Project: University Classroom Building
Location: Southeast United States
Budget: $34 Million
Project Delivery System: Competitive Bid
Party Involved: General Contractor
Case description:
1. Assistant Project Manager Jim Rains was 26 years old, when he newly hired at a large
commercial construction company, and assigned to work on a $34 million dollar university
classroom project in the southeast United States. Upon arriving on the job site, Jim was
introduced to the head superintendent Bob Moore who had been with the firm for 25 years.
Bob was an exceptionally proficient organizer and was often requested by clients for the
supervision of their construction projects. As the project began, things on a whole went
smoothly. In fact, Jim was learning and taking on more project management responsibilities
every day.
2. The winter and spring months brought many days of rain. Often, Bob would have to send
several carpenters home because there was nothing at the construction site for them to do
when it was raining. This did not sit well with the carpenters when they could only work 3
days per week (and were paid for 3 days work) because of rainouts. Other times, Bob would
not send the carpenters home, but would have them sweep up the floors that were already
under roof. This activity would normally take 2 hours with a crew of 4, but Bob would be
forced to pay them for a full 8‐hour day. Some days Bob, being one to hate inefficiency (and
the potential loss of workers not returning to the site after being sent home), sent some of
the carpenters (who would normally be just standing around and sweeping on rainy days) to
his home to work. There the carpenters would work on interior framing, finish carpentry, and
hang drywall in Bob’s new addition. Bob figured that as long as the carpenters were just
hanging around the site with little to do, they might as well earn their pay.
3. The third time Bob sent carpenters to his house on a rainy day; Jim decided to talk with Bob
about the issue of billing the carpenter’s hours to the job site construction cost. Bob was very
noncommittal about the whole issue leaving Jim with the dilemma of confronting one of the
company’s best superintendents. After three more days of watching, several carpenters go to
Bob’s house to work, Jim could no longer tolerate the practice and told Bob that it was
unethical to use company employees for personal work. Bob told Jim that if he did not send
the carpenters home on rainy days they would get paid for basically doing nothing. By sending
the carpenters to his house to use their skills, he was keeping his workers motivated and
satisfied instead of laying them off or having them do small, time‐filling jobs.
MN601 Network Project Management 2018 T2 MN601 Assignment-1 MEL SYD V1.3 3 of 4
Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder July 2018
4. Getting nowhere with the superintendent, Jim had some major decisions to make. Should he
go to the project manager or someone in the home office? What would the company think
about some new employee questioning the practices of a long‐term employee?
5. Because Jim was new to the organization, he decided to talk with Bob one more time and
asked that he discontinue billing employee hours to the construction project if they were in
fact working on Bob’s own house. Bob again refrained from doing anything, only commenting
that the workers would soon be able to work a normal 5‐day workweek because the rainy
season was about to end. Jim still could not let the issue go.
Assignment task
Write a report on the above case study that addresses the following issues; and carry out
research on project management practice and discuss the ethical implications in this case.
In your report, you must use the headings given in Table 1. We encourage you to use at
least 10 key peer reviewed sources for your analysis (a combination of journals, conference
papers, website or any other reliable source to support your analysis).
Table 1: Report headings, their description, and marks for each

Heading	Description	Marks
1. PM Leadership	Discuss, how well are leadership skills demonstrated? Justify your answer in relation to the incidents in the cases study.	5
2. PM Execution	Elaborate on how well is the execution of the project going. What could be the alternatives to the current processes being followed?	5
3. PM Risk Analysis	Which risk(s) should the project plan have identified, and what could be their risk mitigation plan(s)?	5
4. Ethics Assessment	Document facts about the ethical dilemma(s) arising in this case, and explore questions such as: • Does it abide by the law? • Does it align with the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct?	5
5. Ethics Alternatives	Consider the choices available to the concerned parties by documenting the following questions:  What are the possible alternative choices?  What are the pros and cons for each possible choice?	5
6. Ethics Analysis	Identify the candidate decision and test its validity using the factors suggested by PMI Ethical Decision‐Making Framework.	5
7. Ethics Application	Apply ethical principles to your candidate decision by asking questions such as:  Would the choice result in the greatest good?  Would the choice be fair and beneficial to all concerned?	5
8. Ethics Action	Make a decision after considering relevant questions, and justify your choice.	5
9. References	List references and give in‐text referencing using IEEE style.	5
TOTAL	45

MN601 Network Project Management 2018 T2 MN601 Assignment-1 MEL SYD V1.3 4 of 4
Prepared by: A/Prof Nalin Sharda Moderated by: Dr Sharly J Halder July 2018
Acknowledgement:
We thank the following source for making the case study available for educational purposes.
Source: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/ethical‐issues‐case‐study‐overview‐7787
Reference:
Lindsey, P. E. & Kramer, S. W. (2003). Ethical issues in project management: a case study of a
novice project manager. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2003—EMEA, The Hague,
South Holland, The Netherlands. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Marking Rubric:

Grade → Mark →	HD 80‐100%	DI 70‐79%	CR 60‐69%	P 50‐59%	Fail <50%
For ↓	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
All questions	All points discussed are pertinent and covered in depth. Demonstrated the ability to think critically and make good use of the source material.	Points presented are relevant and soundly analysed.	Points presented are generally relevant and analysed.	Points presented are somewhat relevance and briefly discussed.	Points presented are not relevant to the assignment topic.

 

The post The purpose of this assignment appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.

• • Assignment status: Resolved by our Writing Team
  • Source@PrimeWritersBay.com

GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

• • • • NO PLAGIARISM