Skip to main content

The purpose of this

Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: ASM Sajeev November, 2017

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester Term 2 2018
Unit Code MN612
Unit Title Enterprise Architecture
Assessment
Type
Assignment 1
Assessment
Title
Enterprise Architecture Concepts
Purpose of the
assessment
(with ULO
Mapping)
The purpose of this assignment is to assess skills in working with Enterprise
Architecture (EA) and understanding of EA model development.
The following ULOs will be assessed:
a. Analyse the value of EA for an organisation
b. Lead a discussion on the role of EA to support business strategic
goals through IT alignment, planning and governance
Weight 15%
Total Marks 50
Word limit 1200
Due Date Week 6
Submission
Guidelines
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a
completed Assignment Cover Page.
The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body)
font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section
headings.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration
Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this
application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment.
Further information is available at:
https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM
procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of
the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion
from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves
familiar with the full policy and procedure available at:
https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM
procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy
Procedure
. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity
Section in your Unit Description.

MN612 Enterprise Architecture Page 2 of 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: Dr. Sihui (Sue) Zhou July, 2018
Assignment Description
What you need to submit
Investigate the following case study and write a report of approximately 1200 words. Refer to the Marking
Criteria section below for the structure of the report. As the Marking Criteria section suggests, your report
must have the following sections:
Introduction, Identification, Analyse, Design, Evaluate/justification,
Conclusion and Reference style
.
Queen Victoria Market Precinct Renewal
Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne is going through a renewal process. Read the details at
https://ift.tt/2N0nIN1
Now consider this plan by City of Melbourne as an Enterprise level initiative. Study the details very well from
the above link and be aware that as part of renewal:


The heritage sheds will be carefully dismantled, restored and returned to where they stand today.
The much-loved Dairy Produce Hall and Meat and Fish Hall will remain just as they are, with only minor
restoration and renovation works.
The heritage-listed Elizabeth and Victoria Street terraces will be refurbished and the iconic food hall’s
facade will be restored.
Key market infrastructure and parking will be moved below ground, making way for more of what you
love best about the market. This will enable the creation of 1.5 hectares of new open space on the
existing car park, to be known as Market Square.
We’ll ensure there is never a supermarket or large franchise on the market site.
The intersection of Queen and Therry streets will be transformed into the ‘Market Cross,’ a pedestrian
friendly meeting place that can host markets, festivals as well as greener spaces for sitting, eating and
relaxing.
The market will be surrounded by great city streets and tree-lined spaces. There will be more room
for pedestrians and cyclists and improved access to public transport as well as improved customer car
parking.
A realigned and improved Franklin Street will better connect the city to the east and west parts of the

city during peak times. It will also provide an extension to the new Market Square during events and
festivals.

The market precinct will reduce its environmental footprint with a focus on maximising energy
efficiency, recycling and waste management, water saving initiatives and climate resilience.
The nearby Munro development will include community facilities, child care, affordable housing,
market car parking and residential apartments.
The market will continue to trade throughout the renewal, with all current traders guaranteed a spot.

As the link indicates, there are plenty of activities around Business and IT alignment, Data Management and
Modelling
that needs to take place for the successful delivery of the project.
Your report and your presentation should aim to convince City of Melbourne that they need to invest on
Enterprise Architecture. Include examples and information that are specific to this context. The audience will
be the CEO, the General Manager, and the Manager of IT Resources at City of Melbourne.
You may consider the following questions to design your report:

MN612 Enterprise Architecture Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: Dr. Sihui (Sue) Zhou July, 2018
What is EA? Why EA is important? How EA is similar to city planning? What are the benefits of EA? What are
the key challenges in EA? How could City of Melbourne utilize EA? Provide concrete examples.
Marking criteria:
Marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows:

Section to be included in
the report
Description of the section Marks
Introduction Outline of the report ( in 3-4 sentences) 5
Identification Identify 2 important issues 10
Analyse Analyse above identified issues 10
Design Write design part of the proposed solution 10
Evaluate/justification Evaluate your proposed solutions and write justification
of your evaluation
10
Conclusion Write summary of the report 3
Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 2
Total 50

Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 50
Note: The marking rubrics varies for each assignment

Grade
Mark
HD
40-50
DI
35-44
CR
30-34
P
25-29
Fail
<25
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Introduction
/5
All topics are
pertinent and
covered in depth.
Ability to think
critically and
source material is
demonstrated
Topics are
relevant and
soundly
analysed.
Generally
relevant and
analysed.
Some relevance
and briefly
presented.
This is not
relevant to the
assignment
topic.
Identification
/10
Demonstrated
excellent ability to
think critically and
sourced reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrat
ed excellent
ability to
think
critically but
did not
source
reference
material
appropriatel
y
Demonstrated
ability to think
critically and
sourced
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
ability to think
critically and did
not source
reference
material
appropriately
Did not
demonstrate
ability to think
critically and
did not source
reference
material
appropriately
Analyse
/10
Logic is clear and
easy to follow with
strong arguments
Consistency
logical and
convincing
Mostly
consistent
logical and
convincing
Adequate
cohesion and
conviction
Argument is
confused and
disjointed

MN612 Enterprise Architecture Page 4 of 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: Dr. Sihui (Sue) Zhou July, 2018

Design
/10
All elements are
present and very
well integrated.
Components
present with
good
cohesive
Components
present and
mostly well
integrated
Most
components
present
Proposal lacks
structure.
Evaluate/justific
ation
/5
Excellent use of
creditable sources.
Accurate
referencing.
Obvious that
outstanding effort
made
Extremely
good effort
Good effort
made but not
outstanding
Made some
effort. For
example, Web
searches only
Very little
attempt to
reference. Lazy
effort with
inaccuracies
Conclusion
/5
Logic is clear and
easy to follow with
strong arguments
Consistency
logical and
convincing
Mostly
consistent
logical and
convincing
Adequate
cohesion and
conviction
Argument is
confused and
disjointed
Reference style
/5
Clear styles with
excellent source of
references.
Clear
referencing
style
Generally good
referencing
style
Sometimes
clear
referencing
style
Lacks
consistency
with many
errors

 

The post The purpose of this appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom