Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: ASM Sajeev November, 2017
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | Term 2 2018 |
Unit Code | MN612 |
Unit Title | Enterprise Architecture |
Assessment Type |
Assignment 1 |
Assessment Title |
Enterprise Architecture Concepts |
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) |
The purpose of this assignment is to assess skills in working with Enterprise Architecture (EA) and understanding of EA model development. The following ULOs will be assessed: a. Analyse the value of EA for an organisation b. Lead a discussion on the role of EA to support business strategic goals through IT alignment, planning and governance |
Weight | 15% |
Total Marks | 50 |
Word limit | 1200 |
Due Date | Week 6 |
Submission Guidelines |
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. |
Extension | If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment |
Academic Misconduct |
Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: https://ift.tt/2JPj4MM procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
MN612 Enterprise Architecture Page 2 of 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: Dr. Sihui (Sue) Zhou July, 2018
Assignment Description
What you need to submit
Investigate the following case study and write a report of approximately 1200 words. Refer to the Marking
Criteria section below for the structure of the report. As the Marking Criteria section suggests, your report
must have the following sections: Introduction, Identification, Analyse, Design, Evaluate/justification,
Conclusion and Reference style.
Queen Victoria Market Precinct Renewal
Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne is going through a renewal process. Read the details at
https://ift.tt/2N0nIN1
Now consider this plan by City of Melbourne as an Enterprise level initiative. Study the details very well from
the above link and be aware that as part of renewal:
|
The heritage sheds will be carefully dismantled, restored and returned to where they stand today. The much-loved Dairy Produce Hall and Meat and Fish Hall will remain just as they are, with only minor restoration and renovation works. The heritage-listed Elizabeth and Victoria Street terraces will be refurbished and the iconic food hall’s facade will be restored. Key market infrastructure and parking will be moved below ground, making way for more of what you love best about the market. This will enable the creation of 1.5 hectares of new open space on the existing car park, to be known as Market Square. We’ll ensure there is never a supermarket or large franchise on the market site. The intersection of Queen and Therry streets will be transformed into the ‘Market Cross,’ a pedestrian friendly meeting place that can host markets, festivals as well as greener spaces for sitting, eating and relaxing. The market will be surrounded by great city streets and tree-lined spaces. There will be more room for pedestrians and cyclists and improved access to public transport as well as improved customer car parking. A realigned and improved Franklin Street will better connect the city to the east and west parts of the |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
city during peak times. It will also provide an extension to the new Market Square during events and
festivals.
| The market precinct will reduce its environmental footprint with a focus on maximising energy efficiency, recycling and waste management, water saving initiatives and climate resilience. The nearby Munro development will include community facilities, child care, affordable housing, market car parking and residential apartments. The market will continue to trade throughout the renewal, with all current traders guaranteed a spot. |
| |
|
As the link indicates, there are plenty of activities around Business and IT alignment, Data Management and
Modelling that needs to take place for the successful delivery of the project.
Your report and your presentation should aim to convince City of Melbourne that they need to invest on
Enterprise Architecture. Include examples and information that are specific to this context. The audience will
be the CEO, the General Manager, and the Manager of IT Resources at City of Melbourne.
You may consider the following questions to design your report:
MN612 Enterprise Architecture Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: Dr. Sihui (Sue) Zhou July, 2018
What is EA? Why EA is important? How EA is similar to city planning? What are the benefits of EA? What are
the key challenges in EA? How could City of Melbourne utilize EA? Provide concrete examples.
Marking criteria:
Marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows:
Section to be included in the report |
Description of the section | Marks |
Introduction | Outline of the report ( in 3-4 sentences) | 5 |
Identification | Identify 2 important issues | 10 |
Analyse | Analyse above identified issues | 10 |
Design | Write design part of the proposed solution | 10 |
Evaluate/justification | Evaluate your proposed solutions and write justification of your evaluation |
10 |
Conclusion | Write summary of the report | 3 |
Reference style | Follow IEEE reference style | 2 |
Total | 50 |
Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 50
Note: The marking rubrics varies for each assignment
Grade Mark |
HD 40-50 |
DI 35-44 |
CR 30-34 |
P 25-29 |
Fail <25 |
Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Introduction /5 |
All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated |
Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. |
Generally relevant and analysed. |
Some relevance and briefly presented. |
This is not relevant to the assignment topic. |
Identification /10 |
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately |
Demonstrat ed excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriatel y |
Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately |
Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately |
Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately |
Analyse /10 |
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments |
Consistency logical and convincing |
Mostly consistent logical and convincing |
Adequate cohesion and conviction |
Argument is confused and disjointed |
MN612 Enterprise Architecture Page 4 of 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arif Jubaer Moderated by: Dr. Sihui (Sue) Zhou July, 2018
Design /10 |
All elements are present and very well integrated. |
Components present with good cohesive |
Components present and mostly well integrated |
Most components present |
Proposal lacks structure. |
Evaluate/justific ation /5 |
Excellent use of creditable sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious that outstanding effort made |
Extremely good effort |
Good effort made but not outstanding |
Made some effort. For example, Web searches only |
Very little attempt to reference. Lazy effort with inaccuracies |
Conclusion /5 |
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments |
Consistency logical and convincing |
Mostly consistent logical and convincing |
Adequate cohesion and conviction |
Argument is confused and disjointed |
Reference style /5 |
Clear styles with excellent source of references. |
Clear referencing style |
Generally good referencing style |
Sometimes clear referencing style |
Lacks consistency with many errors |
The post The purpose of this appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.
-
- Assignment status: Resolved by our Writing Team
- Source@PrimeWritersBay.com
Comments
Post a Comment