Skip to main content

This unit takes an executive

Unit of Study Guide

Unit Code:
Unit Name:
SBM4202
IS Strategy, Management and
Acquisition

Approved by: Choose an item.
Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
This publication is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be
reproduced by any process without the written permission of Asia Pacific International College.

i
Table of Contents
1. Unit Overview …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
1.1 Unit Description …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2
1.2 Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs)……………………………………………………………………………… 2
1.3 Teaching Methods and Strategies…………………………………………………………………………… 2
1.4 Development of Course Learning Outcomes and Graduate Attributes………………………… 3
1.5 Schedule of Teaching and Learning Activities …………………………………………………………… 3
1.6 Key dates …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
1.7 Student Feedback and Continuous Improvement …………………………………………………….. 4
2. Learning Resources…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
2.1 Prescribed and Recommended Readings…………………………………………………………………. 5
2.1.1 Prescribed…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
2.1.2 Recommended ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
2.1.3 Access to Library Resources ……………………………………………………………………………. 6
2.2 Additional Resources Required ………………………………………………………………………………. 6
3. Assessment Information……………………………………………………………………………………… 7
3.1 Assessment Overview …………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
3.2 Assessment Principles and Practice ………………………………………………………………………… 7
3.3 Submitting assessments………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
3.4 Late submission of assessments……………………………………………………………………………… 8
3.5 Receiving marks for assessments……………………………………………………………………………. 8
3.6 Changes to assessments………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
3.7 Assessment moderation………………………………………………………………………………………… 9
3.8 Appeals against assignment marks …………………………………………………………………………. 9
4. Policies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….10
4.1 Academic Integrity and Professional Standards………………………………………………………. 10
4.2 Other Relevant Policies, Procedures and Forms ……………………………………………………… 10
5. Student Support ………………………………………………………………………………………………..11
5.1 Academic and Learning Support …………………………………………………………………………… 11
5.2 Technical Support……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

ii
5.3 Student Services Support …………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
APPENDIX A – Assessment Information …………………………………………………………………………12
Assignment 1: Debate……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12
Assignment 2: Unit project – Part A …………………………………………………………………………………. 14
Assignment 3: Portfolio………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17
Assignment 4: Poster …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20
APPENDIX B: Unit Moderation Status……………………………………………………………………………22
Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 1
1. Unit Overview

Unit Title IS Strategy, Management and Acquisition
Unit Code SBM4202
Credit Points 6
Pre-Requisites Click or tap here to enter text.
Co-Requisites Click or tap here to enter text.
Equivalent Units Click or tap here to enter text.
Other Requirements Click or tap here to enter text.
AQF Level 7
COURSE(S) BBIS

 

Academic Team – Melbourne
Director of Studies: Dr Viral Pandya Phone: (03) 9603 5323
Email: viral.pandya@apicollege.edu.au
Office: Room 6.05A, Level 6, 399 Lonsdale
Street, Melbourne 3000, Australia
Lecturer: Dr. Sommala Sisombat Phone: (03) 9603 5333
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.
Office: Level 6, 399 Lonsdale Street,
Melbourne 3000, Australia
Academic Team – Sydney
Director of Studies: Dr Rakesh Khanal Phone: (02) 9318 8111
Email: Rakesh.Khanal@apicollege.edu.au
Office: Level 1, 55 Regent Street,
Chippendale, NSW 2008, Australia
Lecturer: Dr. Md M Rehman Phone: (02) 9318 8111
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.
Office: Level 1, 55 Regent Street,
Chippendale, NSW 2008, Australia

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 2
1.1 Unit Description
This unit takes an executive and operational management perspective in exploring the acquisition,
development and implementation of increasingly globalized Information System (IS) projects,
initiatives and implementations. In this context, it details the technological and non-technological
issues relating high-level IS infrastructure and the strategic planning tools and techniques that
support the operational, administrative and strategic organisational needs. The emphasis of the
unit will be on developing an intellectual framework that will allow organisational leaders to
critically assess the plans, policies and procedures and investigate their impact whilst tackling the
effective and successful IS. Students will be provided with a balanced view and deeper
understanding of developing IS strategy and managing IS from organisational and technical
perspectives so that they have a theoretically sound, but nevertheless practically oriented
foundation, to successfully invest, deploy, acquire, use, and manage IS. Students will be able to
reconceptualise and operationalize IS strategy, management and acquisition to justify the
competitive use of IS.
This unit is a core unit in the BBIS program.
1.2 Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs)
On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:
[ULO1] Define IS strategy from an executive and operational management perspective.
[ULO2] Develop, implement and coordinate high-level IS infrastructure that supports the
operational, administrative and strategic organizational needs.
[ULO3] Demonstrate an understanding of technological and organizational issues relating to the
acquisition and management of high-level IS infrastructure.
[ULO4] Develop, implement and coordinate high-level strategic tools and techniques that support
the operational, administrative and strategic organizational needs.
[ULO5] Develop an intellectual framework that will allow organizational leaders to critically assess
the plans, policies and procedures in relation to IS strategy, management and acquisition.
[ULO6] Reconceptualise and operationalize IS strategy for organisations.
1.3 Teaching Methods and Strategies
This unit is delivered over 14 weeks, comprised of 12 weeks of classes and a one-week final
examination period. Unit content is delivered to students via lectures and tutorials, and totals 4
student contact hours per week.
Students will participate in teaching and learning activities including ‘activity-based learning’ under
academic supervision, with frequent interaction with fellow students and the faculty, who will also
provide frequent feedbacks to individuals and the class as a whole.
In addition to timetabled contact hours, students are expected to do at least 4 hours of personal
study each week to review lectures and read prescribed and recommended materials for this unit.
The expected total individual workload for this unit is 140 hours (including in-class activities and
individual self-study).
This unit does not include a Work Integrated Learning (WIL) component.

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 3
1.4 Development of Course Learning Outcomes and Graduate Attributes
This unit introduces the learning required to deliver the following Course Learning Outcomes:

[CLO1] A broad and coherent knowledge of business and management, and an
understanding of how to design, create and deploy information systems as an enabler of
business innovation and competitiveness (particularly technology-enabled businesses).
[CLO4] Knowledge and awareness of the information environment in enterprise
architecture, and how it relates to individual business functions and processes.
[CLO5] Knowledge of enterprise-level business management including risks and statutory
requirements.
[CLO7] Cognitive skills to analyse and evaluate organisational processes, information
requirements, reasoned solutions and source alternatives.
[CLO12] Through effective planning and decision making within a business environment.

Successful completion of this unit also contributes specifically to development of the following
APIC Graduate Attributes:

GA2: Excellent Communicator. Expresses complex ideas orally, in writing, and by various
digital means.
GA9: Inquirer, Innovative and Creative. Seeks information by questioning, and combines
their discoveries with novel thinking to inform the development of new ideas or products.
GA10: Resilient and Adaptable. Adjusts quickly and positively to new conditions and/or
circumstances.
GA11: Culturally Aware. Is sensitive to and respectful of the similarities and differences
between cultural groups.
GA12: Researcher. Evaluates questions, ideas or processes and forms conclusions based on
qualitative and/or quantitative evidence.

1.5 Schedule of Teaching and Learning Activities

Week Topic Scheduled Teaching and Learning Activities
1 Business Strategy
for the Digital World
Introduction to course aims, objectives, target competencies,
learning strategies, resources available, timetable and
deliverables, assessment methods and related briefings
Tutorial 1: Chapter 1 Questions
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 1
2 Business Exploitation
of Information and
Communication
Technology Systems
Tutorial 2: Chapter 2 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 1
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 2
ASSIGNMENT 1 (10%): DEBATE (individual)
3 Information Systems
Development
Approaches
Tutorial 3: Chapter 3 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 2
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 3
ASSIGNMENT 2 (40%): PORTFOLIO (group) – Ongoing
coursework until the last week

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 4

Week Topic Scheduled Teaching and Learning Activities
4 Disruptive
Technologies and
Applications
Tutorial 4: Chapter 4 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 3
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 4
5 Business IT/IS
Alignment
Tutorial 5: Chapter 5 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 4
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 5
6 Strategic IS/IM in
Context
Tutorial 6: Chapter 6 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 5
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 6
7 Global Issues in
Information
Management
Tutorial 7: Chapter 7 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 6
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 7
8 Strategic Knowledge
Management
Tutorial 8: Chapter 8 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 7
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 8
9 Organizational Change,
Culture and Strategic
IS/IT-led Change
Tutorial 9: Chapter 9 questions and discussion of solutions to
Tutorial 8
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 9
10 IS/IT Benefits
Management and
Realization
Tutorial 10: Chapter 10 questions and discussion of solutions
to Tutorial 9
ASSESSMENT 3 (35%): UNIT PROJECT PART A (individual)
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter
11 Strategic IT/IS
Leadership and IT
Governance
Tutorial 11: Chapter 11 questions and discussion of solutions
to Tutorial 10
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 11
12 IT/IS Professionalism,
Ethics and Security
Review and revision
Tutorial 12: Chapter 12 questions and discussion of solutions
to Tutorial 11
Reading: Prescribed Textbook: Chapter 12
Feedback of Group Exercise and Presentation
13 Poster Poster Presentation and Feedback

1.6 Key dates
The Semester Key dates can be assessed at https://ift.tt/2MKbMew
1.7 Student Feedback and Continuous Improvement
APIC is committed to the principle of continuous improvement, and seeks feedback from students
to assist APIC in providing the best possible teaching and learning experience.
As a result of feedback received from students via APIC’s Student Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ),
implemented at the end of each teaching period, the following changes have been made to this unit:
N/A

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 5
2. Learning Resources
2.1 Prescribed and Recommended Readings
2.1.1 Prescribed
Grant, K., Hackney R., Edgar D. (2010), Strategic Information Systems Management, 1st Edition,
Cengage Learning.
2.1.2 Recommended
Textbook(s)
Ward, John, MInstM & Peppard, Joe (2002). Strategic planning for information systems 3rd edn.
John Wiley: England
Websites
Association for Information Systems (AIS)
http://ais.site-ym.com/?
Allens: Service – Corporate Governance
https://ift.tt/2PMLRFq
Australian Institute of Company Directors
https://ift.tt/2PdBwRS
Australian Institute of Management
http://www.aim.com.au/
Computing & Information Sciences
http://cisjournal.org/
Australian Computer Society (ACS)
https://www.acs.org.au/
Computer and Information Systems Managers
https://ift.tt/WML4kJ
MIS Research Group
https://ift.tt/2PdBxoU
Sociosite
https://ift.tt/2N14KpM
Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 6
2.1.3 Access to Library Resources
Library opening hours are as follows:

Melbourne Sydney
Monday – Friday: 9:00am to 9:00pm
Saturday: Closed
Sunday: Closed
Public holidays: Closed
Monday – Friday: 9:00am to 5:00pm
Saturday: Closed
Sunday: Closed
Public holidays: Closed

E-library (ProQUEST) resources are accessible 24/7 via the OLS.
2.2 Additional Resources Required
N/A
Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 7
3. Assessment Information
3.1 Assessment Overview
The assessment in this Unit has 4 components as listed below:

Task Assessment Tasks and Description ULO Weighting
Due Week 2 Debate Individual coursework 10%
Due Week 10 Unit project –
Part A
Group coursework [ULO2],
[ULO3],
[ULO4],
[ULO5]
35%
Due Week 12 Portfolio It is a continuous and ongoing
course work – Individual
assignment
[ULO1],
[ULO2],
[ULO3],
[ULO4],
[ULO5],
[ULO6]
40%
Due Week 13 Poster Individual coursework [ULO1],
[ULO2],
[ULO3],
[ULO4],
[ULO5],
[ULO6]
15%

Full details of all assessment tasks for this unit of study (including detailed marking criteria) can
be found in
Appendix A of this document.
3.2 Assessment Principles and Practice
The following principles and practice inform the design, development and implementation of
assessment at APIC:



Assessment is fair and valid;
Assessment is marked against clearly-defined criteria;
Assessment processes provide timely feedback to students to improve their understanding
and subsequent performance;
Assessment is designed to the appropriate level for the course;
Assessment provides opportunities for students to apply and demonstrate their learning in
a variety of ways, including both individually and working in groups.

Group assignments provide a platform of authentic assessment that highlights best practice and
enhances the development of collaborative skills. The assessment focus is around the process of
working in groups for purposes including:

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 8




Collaboration and cooperation;
Analysis of the task for the purpose of assigning responsibility for its components;
Incorporating elements of leadership, teamwork, delegation and coordination;
Preparation and presentation of group reports, which may be supplemented by individual
component reports;
Understanding and evaluating the challenges that arise in collaborative work, and
formulating techniques to manage them.

Students are expected to undertake all assessment with due regard to the APIC Academic Integrity
Policy (see
Section 4, Policies).
3.3 Submitting assessments
All written assessments are to be submitted via the Unit site on the Online Learning System (OLS)
by the due date and time given in the Assessment Overview. Unit lecturers will provide instructions
and in-class demonstration of the submission process prior to the due date for the first assessment
in the Unit. Students who experience technical issues when attempting to submit their assignment
via the OLS should immediately contact technical support or the website for assistance (see
Section
5.2, Technical Support
).
Vivas, examinations and presentations must be attended as scheduled, unless by prior arrangement
due to exceptional circumstances (see
Section 4, Policies). Non-attendance at a scheduled
assessment may result in a Fail grade for the assessment piece, and may impact students’ overall
grade in the Unit.
3.4 Late submission of assessments
Written assessments that are submitted after the due date and time published in this Unit of Study
Guide will receive a penalty of 10% of the maximum available mark per working day. Exceptions to
this will only be granted where a student has requested and been granted an extension to the
assignment due date in advance, or where an application for Special Consideration has been granted
(see
Section 4, Policies).
3.5 Receiving marks for assessments
Students will normally be notified of marks for individual assignments via the OLS. All student results
for an individual assessment item will be released concurrently.
Marks will normally be returned within two weeks of the assessment being submitted. Students will
be notified if there is to be a delay to the release of marks for an assignment.
3.6 Changes to assessments
Other than in exceptional circumstances, no changes should be made to the assessment profile
published in this Unit of Study Guide after the end of Week 1 in any teaching period. If after this
time it becomes necessary to make changes to an assessment, any modifications must be:
made in consultation with students;
Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 9
communicated to all students in writing by the Unit Coordinator; and
approved by the Dean.
3.7 Assessment moderation
Pre- and post-assessment moderation is a quality assurance process for ensuring appropriate
assessment and the consistent marking and grading of student work. APIC does not define the
proportion of marks and/ or grades that lie within pre-determined bands.
Moderation may occur:

before marking individual assessment tasks (pre-assessment) to ensure markers have a
shared understanding of the relevant criteria and standards; and
after marking individual assessment tasks and before the release of marks to students (post
assessment) to ensure markers have applied the relevant criteria and standards

consistently.
3.8 Appeals against assignment marks
Appeals against the mark(s) awarded for an assessment task will only be considered on the grounds
that:


a Unit of Study Guide was not provided for the unit;
the assessment requirements as specified in the Unit of Study Guide were varied without
the approval of the Dean and without written notification to students;
assessment requirements specified in the Unit of Study Guide were unreasonably or
prejudicially applied to the student;
the student believes that a clerical error has occurred in the computation of the mark; or
due regard has not been paid to an approved application for Special Consideration.

Requests for re-marking must be made in writing to the Unit Coordinator within 2 weeks of the
results for the assignment being released.
The assignment will be re-marked by an academic staff member other than the person who did the
original marking. Re-marking may result in the original mark being confirmed, or the student being
awarded a higher or lower mark than originally awarded.
Results of re-marking are final and may not be appealed (see
Section 4, Policies).
Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 10
4. Policies
4.1 Academic Integrity and Professional Standards
Plagiarism is the inclusion of another person’s work within your submission without
acknowledgment or permission. While limited amounts of information and concepts expressed by
others may be included as part of your work, each inclusion must be identified by appropriate
referencing and acknowledgement to the original author. Plagiarism is regarded as a form of
cheating. The penalties associated with misconduct are severe, and plagiarism may result in failure
or variation of grade in the Unit.
All APIC students must familiarise themselves with the APIC Academic Integrity Policy, which can be
accessed here:
https://ift.tt/2C5X4OS.
4.2 Other Relevant Policies, Procedures and Forms
The following documents contain important information relevant to all aspects of studying at APIC:
Policies:

Assessment Policy
Academic Progress Policy
Attendance Policy
Examination Policy
Recognition of Prior Learning Policy
Student Code of Conduct
Student Grievance and Appeals Policy

Forms:
APIC General Regulations
Application for Special Consideration
Application to Reduce Study Load or Overload

All APIC students are expected to familiarise themselves with these documents as part of their
rights and responsibilities as an APIC student.

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 11
5. Student Support
5.1 Academic and Learning Support
Students’ first point of contact for academic support is their tutor or lecturer. Contact details for
relevant staff are provided in the
Unit Overview, Section 1 of this Unit of Study Guide.
Students will be advised in class of the consultation hours for this Unit and the best means for
contacting individual teaching staff.
APIC also provides a range of workshops and tutorials to support students with study skills, academic
writing and English language learning. These services are open to all APIC students free of charge.
Students may access these services either by referral from a lecturer or tutor, or by speaking directly
to a member of staff at their campus reception desk.
5.2 Technical Support
APIC provides a 24/7/365 OLS technical support service to its staff and students. To access this
service please call 1800 092 652 and select option 1 for students.
The technical team will take a step-by-step approach to resolve queries, and will automatically
escalate unresolved tickets to a local APIC OLS administrator.
We aim to resolve any technical issue within 48 hours of the issue being reported.
5.3 Student Services Support
Students who feel overwhelmed by their studies or living in a new country are strongly encouraged
to make an appointment to see the Welfare and Engagement Officer at their campus. APIC’s Welfare
and Engagement Service provides free confidential support and personalised assistance to help
students to manage their personal issues and help develop strategies to concentrate on their studies
and get more out of their APIC experience.
APIC’s Student Services team can be contacted at
studentservices@apicollege.edu.au, or by
speaking to a member of staff at the campus reception desk.
All student application forms can be accessed from
https://ift.tt/2PNAahR.
Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 12
APPENDIX A – Assessment Information
Assignment 1: Debate

Due date: Week 2
Group/individual: Individual assignment
Word count: N/A
Weighting: 10%
Unit learning outcomes: N/A
Course Learning Outcomes:
Graduate Attributes:

Assignment Details:
An argument for and against a specific topic, often in teams and according to certain rules
Marking Criteria:

Assessment Criteria HD
Excellent
D
Very
Good
C
Good
P
Satisfactory
F
Poor
Marks
Obtained
Criteria 1 (10%)
Effective communication and
coordination among the
group
Criteria 2 (10%)
Communicated clearly,
understandably and
creatively
Criteria 3 (20%)
Presented ideas, findings and
recommendations credibly
to convince the audience
Criteria 4 (15%)
Satisfactorily answered
questions and objections

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 13

Criteria 5 (15%)
Adapted to the cultural
requirements of the
stakeholders as they are from
diverse backgrounds with
diverse abilities.
Criteria 6 (10%)
Got feedback on the ideas
from the audience
Criteria 7 (10%)
Satisfied the time
requirements.
Criteria 8 (10%)
Debated respectfully and
enthusiastically.
TOTAL MARKS: 100% Total Marks Obtained:
Comments:
Lecturer: Location: Date:

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 14
Assignment 2: Unit project – Part A

Due date: Week 10
Group/individual: Group assignment
Word count: 3,000
Weighting: 35%
Unit learning outcomes: [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4], [ULO5]
Course Learning Outcomes:
Graduate Attributes: Click or tap here to enter text.

Assignment Details:
Major assessment Part A (e.g. proposal and literature review)
Marking Criteria:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Assessment
criteria
Higher
Distinction
Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Knowledge
&
Understanding
(30%)
demonstrates
exceptional
comprehension
of
topic
Shows
thorough
knowledge
and
understanding
of
the
topic,
with
evidence
of
reading
beyond
the
key
texts
Shows
evidence
of
relevant
and
sound
knowledge
and
understanding
of
the
topic
Shows
basic
knowledge
of
the
topic
Shows
insufficient
knowledge
of
the
topic

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 15

Critical
Analysis
(25%)
Demonstrates
sophisticated
analysis
using
ideas
and
principles
beyond
those
introduced
in
the
module
Essay
shows
a
resourceful
and
imaginative
analysis
using
ideas
and
principles
beyond
those
introduced
in
the
module
Shows
evidence
of
analysis
using
ideas
and
principles
introduced
in
the
module
The
essay
is
largely
descriptive
with
some
discussion
using
ideas
and
principles
introduced
in
the
module
Essay
is
generally
descriptive
and
uncritical.
Some
inaccuracy
in
the
material
Logical
argument
(20%)
The student
provides a
well
articulated and
detailed
argument
containing no
errors in logic.
The student
provides a
well
articulated
but not
detailed
argument
containing no
errors in
logic.
The student
presents an
argument that
makes a point
but is not
well
articulated or
contains
some
significant
errors in logic
The
student’s
argument
makes no
clear point
or has so
many errors
in logic that
it is invalid.
No
judgment
can be
made.

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 16

Use
of
language and
grammar
(15%)
Essay
displays
an
excellent
use
of
standard
written
English
Essay
displays
a
very
good
standard
written
English
with
all
statements
clearly
expressed
Essay
displays
a
very
standard
written
English
with
few,
if
any,
grammatical
or
spelling
errors.
Written
in
an
appropriately
academic
style.
The
work
is
written
to
an
acceptable
standard
of
English.
There
may
be
some
grammatical
errors
and
the
work
ma
need
more
careful
editing.
Poor
standard
of
written
English.
Care
needs
to
be
taken
with
elements
of
grammar,
spelling
and
sentence
construction
Reading
&
Referencing
(10%)
Essay
fully
supported
by
reference
to
relevant
up
to
date
material.
Accurate
use
of
Harvard
referencing
technique.
Clear
evidence
of
wide
and
relevant
reading.
Accurate
use
of
Harvard
referencing
technique
Effective
use
of
key
reading.
Accurate
use
of
Harvard
referencing
system
Appropriate
use
made
of
a
limited
range
of
reading.
Largely
accurate
use
of
Harvard
system
Poor
use
of
reading.
Poor
or
incorrect
using
of
Harvard
system

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 17
Assignment 3: Portfolio

Due date: Week 12
Group/individual: Group assignment
Word count: 4,000
Weighting: 40%
Unit learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4], [ULO5], [ULO6]
Course Learning Outcomes:
Graduate Attributes:

Assignment Details:
Students’ compilation of work with a coherent structure and common theme, collected over a
period of time
Marking Criteria:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Assessment
criteria
Higher Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Knowledge
&
Understanding
(30%)
demonstrates
exceptional
comprehension
of
topic
Shows
thorough
knowledge
and
understanding
of
the
topic,
with
evidence
of
reading
beyond
the
key
texts
Shows
evidence
of
relevant
and
sound
knowledge
and
understanding
of
the
topic
Shows
basic
knowledge
of
the
topic
Shows
insufficient
knowledge
of
the
topic

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 18

Critical Analysis
(25%)
Demonstrates
sophisticated
analysis
using
ideas
and
principles
beyond
those
introduced
in
the
module
Essay
shows
a
resourceful
and
imaginative
analysis
using
ideas
and
principles
beyond
those
introduced
in
the
module
Shows
evidence
of
analysis
using
ideas
and
principles
introduced
in
the
module
The
essay
is
largely
descriptive
with
some
discussion
using
ideas
and
principles
introduced
in
the
module
Essay
is
generally
descriptive
and
uncritical.
Some
inaccuracy
in
the
material
Logical
argument
(20%)
The student
provides a well
articulated and
detailed argument
containing no
errors in logic.
The student
provides a
well
articulated
but not
detailed
argument
containing no
errors in logic.
The student
presents an
argument that
makes a point
but is not well
articulated or
contains some
significant
errors in logic
The
student’s
argument
makes no
clear point
or has so
many errors
in logic that
it is invalid.
No
judgment
can be
made.

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 19

Use
of
language and
grammar (15%)
Essay
displays
an
excellent
use
of
standard
written
English
Essay
displays
a
very
good
standard
written
English
with
all
statements
clearly
expressed
Essay
displays
a
very
standard
written
English
with
few,
if
any,
grammatical
or
spelling
errors.
Written
in
an
appropriately
academic
style.
The
work
is
written
to
an
acceptable
standard
of
English.
There
may
be
some
grammatical
errors
and
the
work
ma
need
more
careful
editing.
Poor
standard
of
written
English.
Care
needs
to
be
taken
with
elements
of
grammar,
spelling
and
sentence
construction
Reading
&
Referencing
(10%)
Essay
fully
supported
by
reference
to
relevant
up
to
date
material.
Accurate
use
of
Harvard
referencing
technique.
Clear
evidence
of
wide
and
relevant
reading.
Accurate
use
of
Harvard
referencing
technique
Effective
use
of
key
reading.
Accurate
use
of
Harvard
referencing
system
Appropriate
use
made
of
a
limited
range
of
reading.
Largely
accurate
use
of
Harvard
system
Poor
use
of
reading.
Poor
or
incorrect
using
of
Harvard
system

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 20
Assignment 4: Poster

Due date: Week 13
Group/individual: Individual assignment
Word count: N/A
Weighting: 15%
Unit learning outcomes: [ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4], [ULO5], [ULO6]
Course Learning Outcomes:
Graduate Attributes:

Assignment Details:
A representational work printed on card, canvas or similar medium for designed public display
containing text and graphic elements.
Marking Criteria:

Assessment Criteria HD
Excellent
D
Very
Good
C
Good
P
Satisfactory
F
Poor
Marks
Obtained
Poster content (50%)
Introduction &
background with
pertinent literature
review cited (10%)
Objectives clearly
stated and concise
(10%)
Methodology & Data
collected are clearly
described with
literature support
(10%)
Results & discussion
clear, and concise
(10%)
Significance of study
and implications
(10%)

Unit of Study Guide: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 21

Poster Organisation
(20%)
Logical order (10%)
Effective use of space,
smooth transition
between sections
(10%)
Poster Presentation
(30%)
Legible
consistent/balance
font, colour, contrast
and no conflicting
background (10%)
Text no grammatical
errors, not wordy and
excessive (10%)
Effective use of
figures, diagram,
pictures and tables –
well coordinated with
text (10%)
TOTAL MARKS: 100% Total Marks Obtained:
Comments:
Lecturer: Location: Date:

Unit Moderation: SBM4202, 22/06/2018 3:48:00 PM Page 22
APPENDIX B: Unit Moderation Status

UNIT: IS Strategy, Management and Acquisition
UNIT CODE: SBM4202
UNIT COORDINATOR:
UNIT MODERATOR:

I have read the Unit of Study Guide for the above-named Unit and consulted with the Unit
Coordinator on amendment, and in my opinion:
a) information presented in the Schedule of Teaching and Learning Activities
is consistent
with the current version of the Unit of Study Guide;
b) the chosen educational strategies
are appropriate for the aims and objectives of the
Unit;
c) the assessment tasks
are consistent with the Unit of Study Guide;
d) the assessment tasks
are for the aims & objectives of the Unit.

Signed: Date:
Moderator

 

The post This unit takes an executive appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom