Skip to main content

To develop skills in formulating research questions and research objectives; to conduct a systematic literature

Assessment task 1: Literature review for a research question

Due date:                                           Friday 30th March 2018 3pm AEST

Weighting:                                        40%  

Length and/or format:                     2000 words

Purpose:                                           To develop skills in formulating research questions and research objectives; to conduct a systematic literature search using different data search engines; and to successfully learn how to use EndNote.

Learning outcomes assessed:       2, 4, 5

2. Demonstrate an understanding of a range of research methodologies used in health settings

4. Develop health-related research questions, selecting appropriate research methods for those questions

5. Undertake critical analyses of research paradigms and methods as applied to specific health settings and problems and use critical appraisal tools to appraise methodological flaws in published research.

Criteria 1

Search Question and Plan

  • Clear question/objective formulated to guide search
  • PICO / SMART

Specific (What is the specific task?):

Who is involved?

What do you want to accomplish?

Measurable (What are the concrete criteria for measuring change?):

How will we know that change has occurred?

How much change is expected?

Achievable (Is the task feasible?):

Are the limitations and constraints understood?

Can you meet this objective with the resources available, and within the proposed timeframe? Relevant and/or Realistic (Does this relate directly to the goal?):

Does the objective accurately address the scope of the problem?

Are there other factors that need to be considered to ensure the plan works?

Time-specific (Within what timeframe are you working?):

When will this objective be met?

When can short term outcomes be expected?

PICO

Patient, population, or problem

Intervention

Comparison/Control

Outcome

https://youtu.be/ypYkaKnn8_4

  • Comprehensive use of synonyms, clear distinction between concepts (this is the distinction between PICO).

Note:

These are just guides – although it does help you think through your design.

 

 

Criteria 2 – Search History:


  • Thorough use of Thesaurus index terms; Key words; MESH terms; Limit fields

  • Key word searches conducted in title and abstract fields

  • Truncation used appropriately

  • Terms clearly developed

  • Boolean operators OR, AND used appropriately

  • Limit fields included such as age or diagnosis

Criteria – 3 Integrity in research conduct and ethical concerns briefly outlined

https://cirt.gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/quantresearch/keyissues

https://cirt.gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/quantresearch/ethics

Criteria – 4 Selection of relevant references and rationale provided

Extract from the matrix for top marks All selected references are highly relevant to search question and rationale demonstrates high level understanding of measurement issues.

Criteria – 5 References, appendices & format:
References used with correct APA 6th style
Clear use of language with minimal spelling and grammatical errors

  1. PICO or SMART or a well thought out research question with sound rational
  2. Develop you search terms (this could be MESH terms) and pick the most appropriate databases
  3. Conduct search and collect information form searches in a PRISMA format
  4. Encompass a CASP rating on your filtered articles.
  5. Answer question you developed in step 1 via your systematic search.

 

Appendix 1: Marking guidelines Assessment 1: Literature review for a research question Criteria Fail (N) Pass (PA) Credit (CR) Distinction (D) High Distinction (HD)
Search Question and Plan

Clear question/objective formulated to guide search

PICO / SMART Comprehensive use of synonyms, clear distinction between concepts

LO: 1, 4

Search question is missing key elements.

Search Plan is missing or has been done incorrectly or inadequately.

Search question adequate.

Search Plan is present but lacks detail.

Search question includes all key elements.

Search Plan is clear and logical.

Search question includes all elements and is clearly expressed.

Search Plan is clear, logical and includes an appropriate variety of terms.

Search question is clearly focused and follows format.

Search Plan is clear, logical, and comprehensive.

Grades 0-5 6-7 8 9 10
Search History:

Thorough use of Thesaurus index terms; Key words; MESH terms; Limit fields.

Key word searches conducted in title and abstract fields

Truncation used appropriately. Terms clearly developed

Boolean operators OR, AND used appropriately

Limit fields included such as age or diagnosis

LO: 2

Components of the search history are missing or there are numerous errors or confusion. Search strategy is difficult to follow or lacks logic. Most components of the search history are present. Some components may be difficult to follow or poorly structured. All components of the search history are present and are logical in their progression. Some components may lack sufficient detail or there may be some confusion of ideas or process. All components of the search history are present and the search is constructed in a logical progressive manner. No confusion or errors. All components of the search history are present and the search is thorough and well –targeted. No errors, confusion or omissions.
Grades 0-5 6-7 8 9 10
Integrity in research conduct and ethical concerns briefly outlined

LEARNING OUTCOME: 1

Ethical concerns not outlined Ethical concerns partly outlined but argument weak Ethical concerns fully outlined but argument weak Ethical concerns fully outlined with moderate argument Ethical concerns fully outlined with strong argument
Grades 0-2.5 3-3.5 4 4.5 5

 

The post To develop skills in formulating research questions and research objectives; to conduct a systematic literature appeared first on My Assignment Tutor.



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Identify and discuss a key milestone in the history of computers that interests you and why.

  Part 1Title: Lab ResponseDiscuss one feature of MS Word and one feature of MS Excel that you found challenging within the lab and why. Examples are WordArt, inserting shapes, adding borders, cell styles, etc. This response should be at least one paragraph in length. Part 2Title: History of Computers Identify and discuss a key milestone in the history of computers that interests you and why. This section should be at least one paragraph. Part 3Title: System Software vs. Application Software In your words, explain the difference between application software and system software as if to another coworker who has limited technical knowledge. Use examples to support your rationalization. This section should be at least two paragraphs. Part 4Title: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency In a minimum of one paragraph each: 1. Conduct some research on the internet and discuss one underlying technology of cryptocurrencies like blockchain, cryptography, distributed ledger technol...

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security (CISA)

 Develop a research paper that identifies a specific Department of Homeland Security (DHS) operating agency. Fully describe 1 DHS operating agency from the following list: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security (CISA) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) U.S. Secret Service (USSS) Transportation Security Administration (TSA) The information must include a discussion of the selected DHS agency. Identify the agency’s mission, goals, objectives, and metrics. Conduct an analysis of how these mission areas address the threats or challenges. Recommend agency program priorities among the current set of goals, objectives, metrics, or budget items. Justification of all choices is an essential element of this assignment. Reference all source material and citations using APA format. WE OFF...

Discuss how the project

ord count : no idea 1. You are required to write a report on all project activities involved in all the 10 knowledge areas of project management for the entire project life cycle. You should also include a list of the respective PM documents, for example PM Plan, PM Quality Management Plan, Risk management, Procurement, etc. The report must include the activities that are considered before the project is closed out. 2. Discuss how the project quality management plan can provide adequate standards and controls in managing global teams in projects. Your discussion must provide adequate arguments for the need of cultural awareness and legal issues. Regards, The post Discuss how the project appeared first on My Assignment Tutor . Assignment status :  Resolved by our Writing Team Source@ PrimeWritersBay.com GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS   CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com NO PLAGIARISM