Skip to main content

What did you do to consider your audience? How did your audience impact your writing? How did you get started on your project?

For your Module 4 Journal, you are being asked to reflect on your writing process for your narrative essay assignment. In this journal, you should describe the steps you took to develop your narrative assignment with a focus on the following questions:
What did you do to consider your audience? How did your audience impact your writing? How did you get started on your project? Did you encounter any struggles? If so, what were they and how did you address them? What kind of feedback did you receive from the peer review? What changes did you make based on that feedback? What additional revisions and edits did you make to your essay? How do you feel about your narrative overall? Is there anything you would do differently if you had more time? Your journal entry should be at least 200 words in length. Please remember that only you and your professor will have access to your journal.
See the Course Calendar for due dates for posts and responses.
Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc.) and save it frequently to your computer. For those assignments that are not written essays and require uploading images or PowerPoint slides, please follow uploading guidelines provided by your instructor.
Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Submit Assignment” in the upper right corner. Click on “Browse,” browse your computer, and select your file. Click “Open” and verify the correct file name has appeared next to the Browse button. Enter your comments, if any, in the Comments area. Click on “Submit Assignment.”
Evaluation
This assignment will be graded using the rubric displayed below. Please review this rubric prior to beginning your work. You can also access the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. All journal entries together make up 10% of the total course grade.
Rubric SLA Default Grading Rubric for Journal Assignments SLA Default Grading Rubric for Journal Assignments Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome The treatment of the topic assigned is of sufficient depth and breadth showing significant comprehension of the issues involved. 20.0 pts The treatment of the topic meets expectations in both depth and breadth of all the important issues involved. Demonstrates a thorough comprehension of the complexity of the topic. 17.0 pts The treatment of the topic is adequate in the depth and breadth of the important issues involved. Demonstrates an acceptable comprehension of the complexity of the topic. 15.0 pts The treatment of the topic is appropriate in both depth and breadth for most of the important issues involved. Demonstrates a minimal comprehension of the complexity of the topic. 13.0 pts The treatment of the topic is marginally appropriate in depth or breadth for the issues involved. Does not demonstrate an adequate comprehension of the complexity of the topic. 11.0 pts The treatment of the topic is NOT appropriate in either: its depth and/or breadth for the issues involved. Does not demonstrate an adequate comprehension of the complexity of the topic. 0.0 pts No submission 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome The quantity and quality of information and its relatedness to the topic are appropriate for college level work. 20.0 pts The information exceeds expectations for both quantity and quality for college level work. This information shows insight about the topic. 17.0 pts The quantity and quality of all the information provided is adequate for college level work. All the information is directly related to the topic. 15.0 pts The quantity and quality of most of the information provided is acceptable for college level work. Most of the information is directly related to the topic. 13.0 pts Some of the information is of sufficient quantity and/or quality for college level work. Rarely is it directly related to the topic. 11.0 pts The quantity and/or quality of information is unacceptable for college level work. The information is not related to the topic. 0.0 pts No submission 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome The authenticity of the journal draws from personal experience, including observation, reflection, and analysis. 20.0 pts The authenticity of the journal is apparent, throughout; it explores personal experiences and includes insightful observations, reflections, and analyses. 17.0 pts The authenticity of the journal is apparent; it draws from personal experience at an acceptable level, and it includes sufficient observation, reflection, and analysis. 15.0 pts The authenticity of the journal is rarely apparent; it draws from personal experience at an elementary level, it includes some efforts at observation, reflection, and analysis. 13.0 pts The authenticity of the journal is not apparent; it struggles to draws from personal experience and it includes at only a basic level some efforts at observation, reflection, and/or analysis. 11.0 pts The journal does not draw from personal experience; it does not include any observation, reflection, and/or analysis. 0.0 pts No submission 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing mechanics: Punctuation, spelling, and grammar are appropriate for college level work. 20.0 pts The work demonstrates writing mechanics: the spelling, grammar and punctuation are always correct and demonstrate command of college level skills in writing. 17.0 pts The work demonstrates writing mechanics: the spelling, grammar and punctuation are consistently correct and appropriate for college level work. 15.0 pts The work demonstrates writing mechanics: the spelling, grammar and punctuation are mostly correct but minimally acceptable for college level work. 13.0 pts The work overall demonstrates minimally acceptable writing mechanics: the spelling, grammar and punctuation are sometimes correct but below standards for college level work. 11.0 pts The work demonstrates poor writing mechanics: the spelling, grammar and punctuation are NOT acceptable for college level work. 0.0 pts No submission 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome The work demonstrates an appropriate level of skill with syntax and sentence structure to bring clarity and conciseness to the journal. 20.0 pts The writing quality demonstrates excellent use of syntax and sentence structure to bring all the necessary clarity and conciseness to the journal. 17.0 pts The writing quality demonstrates adequate skills at using syntax and sentence structure to bring an acceptable level of clarity and conciseness to the journal. 15.0 pts The writing quality demonstrates basic skills at using syntax and sentence structure to bring some clarity and conciseness to the journal. 13.0 pts The writing quality demonstrates minimally acceptable use of syntax and sentence structure to bring marginal clarity and conciseness to the journal. 11.0 pts The writing quality does not show appropriate use of syntax and/or sentence structure to bring ANY clarity and conciseness to the journal. 0.0 pts No submission 20.0 pts Total Points: 100.0
 GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning
Post a Comment
Read more

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom
Post a Comment
Read more