Skip to main content

Giltinane, Charlotte Louise Affiliation: District nursing sister, Cambridgeshire Community Services, Cambridge Source: Nursing Standard

Use/write the job on the Template that i downloaded. Here the link for the paper: Leadership styles and theories. Authors: Giltinane, Charlotte Louise Affiliation: District nursing sister, Cambridgeshire Community Services, Cambridge Source: Nursing Standard (NURS STAND), 6/12/2013; 27(41): 35-39. (5p) Publication Type: Journal Article - review Language: English Major Subjects: Management Styles -- Evaluation Nursing Administration Nurse Attitudes Minor Subjects: Interpersonal Relations; Personnel Management; National Health Programs -- United Kingdom; Motivation; United Kingdom Abstract: It is useful for healthcare professionals to be able to identify the leadership styles and theories relevant to their nursing practice. Being adept in recognising these styles enables nurses to develop their skills to become better leaders, as well as improving relationships with colleagues and other leaders, who have previously been challenging to work with. This article explores different leadership styles and theories, and explains how they relate to nursing practice. Journal Subset: Double Blind Peer Reviewed; Europe; Expert Peer Reviewed; Nursing; Peer Reviewed; UK & Ireland Special Interest: Nursing Administration ISSN: 0029-6570 MEDLINE Info: PMID: 23905259 NLM UID: 9012906 Entry Date: 20130618 Revision Date: 20150819 Accession Number: 104179691 Database: CINAHL Complete THE FOLLOWING ARE THE STEPS TO FOLLOW AND ALSO THE RUBIC.: PREPARING THE SCHOLARLY PAPER PHASE 2 Carefully read these instructions and the Rubric. Download the Week 6 Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Use of the assigned template is required. Rename that document as Your Last Name Scholarly Paper Phase 1.docx, for example Smith Scholarly Paper Phase 2. Save it to your own computer or drive in a location where you will be able to retrieve it later. Type your assignment directly on the saved template using Microsoft Word. The document must be saved as a .docx. Save frequently to prevent loss of your work. The only resource for your paper is the following assigned article: Article link (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Note: Logging in to the Chamberlain Library is needed to access this article. Use of the assigned article is required. Follow the instructions and specifics on the assigned required template and the rubric. You will demonstrate your scholarly writing abilities as well as APA abilities in references, citations, quotations, and paraphrasing. See rubric for length limitations for each section and other criteria. For the Introduction section (see rubric for details), introduce the assigned paper topic; explain that the purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the assigned article; explain that that the impact of the article contents on your own future practice will be included; and length must be 50–75 words. For the Article Summary section (see rubric for details), clearly summarize the major content of the assigned article using 175–200 words; content must include main ideas from across the entire article; specifics should be excellent; content must be attributed to the correct source; and instructor feedback from Week 4 Scholarly Paper Phase 1 must be used to revise and improve this section. For the Impact section, clearly state how learning from the assigned article will impact your future practice; length must be 125–150 words; writing must be concise and clearly relate the assigned article contents to practice; use first person in this section; and instructor feedback from Week 4 Scholarly Paper Phase 1 must be used to revise and improve this section. For the Conclusion, write a concise summary of main points of the paper; provide a concluding statement; and length must be 75–100 words. Double check your work with the rubric prior to submission. Note: Assigned Template must be used for this assignment. The Assigned Template has been specially prepared to help you do well on this assignment. See #2 above. Note: Assigned Article must be used for this assignment. Failure to do so may result in loss of points and/or Academic Integrity violation investigation. FOLLOW THE RUBRIC BELOW: Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Title Page 5.0 pts Title page adheres very well to the format of the assigned required template (0-1 errors). 4.0 pts Title page adheres mostly well to the format of the assigned required template (2 errors). 3.0 pts Title page somewhat adheres to the format of the assigned required template (3 errors). 2.0 pts Title page does not adhere well to the format of the assigned required template (4 errors). 0.0 pts No title page OR more than 5 errors. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Margins, Headings, Headers, Font, Spacing 5.0 pts Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere well to APA format and the assigned required template. 4.0 pts Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere fairly well to APA format and the assigned required template. 3.0 pts Adherence of margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing to APA format and the assigned required template is only fair. 2.0 pts Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere poorly to APA format and the assigned required template. 0.0 pts Headings not used and paper is single spaced with incorrect font and margins. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction 20.0 pts Clearly states the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. 18.0 pts States the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. 16.0 pts Vaguely states the paper topic, explains that paper is summary of the assigned article, and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. OR uses slightly fewer than 50 words or slightly more than 75 words. 8.0 pts May not sufficiently explain all required items in previous columns of this criterion. OR uses significantly fewer than 50 words or significantly more than 75 words. 0.0 pts Did not sufficiently explain any required items in previous columns of this criterion. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assigned Article Summary Clearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source.Summarizes the paper and makes a concluding statement. 65.0 pts Clearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 57.0 pts Summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are good. Content is attributed to the correct source. Good revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 52.0 pts Vaguely summarizes the content of the assigned article. OR uses slightly fewer than 175 words or slightly more than 200 words. OR Content may or may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are fair. OR All content may not be attributed to the correct source. Fair revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 25.0 pts May not sufficiently summarize content of the assigned article. OR uses significantly fewer than 175 words or significantly more than 200 words. OR Content may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are poor. OR Content is not be attributed to the correct source. Poor revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 0.0 pts Did not use the assigned article. 65.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Impact on Your Future Practice Clearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person. 65.0 pts Clearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 57.0 pts States how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, relates article contents to practice in a mostly clear manner. Uses first person. Good revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 52.0 pts Vaguely states how learning from the article will impact your future practice OR uses slightly fewer than 125 words or slightly more than 150 words OR article contents related to practice in a fair manner. May or may not first person. Fair revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 25.0 pts May not sufficiently state how content of the article impacts your future practice OR uses significantly fewer than 125 words or significantly more than 150 words. OR article contents related to practice in a poor manner. Specifics are poor. OR does not use first person. Poor revisions from Week 4 Phase 1 based on Week 4 Phase 1 instructor feedback. 0.0 pts Did not provide statements required in this section. 65.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion Clearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes strong a concluding statement. 25.0 pts Clearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes strong a concluding statement. 22.0 pts Writes a concise summary of this paper. Writes a good concluding statement. 20.0 pts Writes a vague summary of this paper. Writes a fair concluding statement. 10.0 pts Writes a poor summary of this paper. Writes a poor concluding statement. 0.0 pts Did not sufficiently provide any required items in previous columns of this criterion. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reference for Assigned Journal Article See page 198 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers 10.0 pts Reference for the assigned article is typed using correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available. Minimal or no errors (0–1 error). 9.0 pts Reference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 2–3 errors. 8.0 pts Reference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 4-5 errors. 4.0 pts Reference typed with 6-8 errors in APA format from the items at left 0.0 pts Reference is not for the assigned article OR APA format includes more than 8 errors. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quotation(s) and Citation See pages 170-171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers 10.0 pts Types 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using correct APA citation including quotation marks, authors’ names, year, page numbers, and parentheses with no errors or one minor error. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. 9.0 pts Types 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation including items at left with 2–3 minor errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. 8.0 pts Quotation slightly too long or too short. OR Types a quotation (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation with 4-5 errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. 4.0 pts Quotation excessively too long or too short, or quoted selected words or ideas the author(s) of the assigned article cited from another source, or 6-7 errors in APA format. 0.0 pts More than 7 errors in APA quotation format. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paraphrased Areas and Citations See pages 171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers 10.0 pts Types appropriately paraphrased version of specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citation including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 0-1 error. 9.0 pts Types mostly appropriately paraphrased version of the specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citation including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 2–3 errors in paraphrasing or citation. 8.0 pts Types minimally appropriately paraphrased version of the specific ideas from assigned article using APA citation including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 4-5 errors. 4.0 pts Poorly paraphrased version and/or APA citation with 6 or more errors OR citation missing for paraphrased ideas. 0.0 pts Copied several sequential words from article. May or may not include quotation marks and/or citation. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics and Organization Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors 10.0 pts Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: - well organized and logical, - correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, - professional wording is used, - uses complete sentences, - paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed 9.0 pts Good mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. A few minor errors noted. 8.0 pts Fair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Some errors noted. 4.0 pts Poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Many errors noted. 0.0 pts Very poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column such that writing is difficult to follow or understand. 10.0 pts Total Points: 225.0
 GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom