Skip to main content

a potential, and arguably realistic, disaster scenario

Critical Thinking for the IT Professional Major Assignment Instructions
Aim of the Assignment
The aim of this assignment is to give you a chance to research the dynamic relationships in large systems.
You will be assigned a topic containing three things:
1 a potential, and arguably realistic, disaster scenario
2 a linked and plausible cause for this scenario 3 a wildcard element.
This assignment gives you the opportunity to do the following things:
• research a genuine existing or possible future systems problem
• examine possible elements of the systems contributing to the problem
• separate fallacies and conspiracy theories from factual information
• organise and present the information in a way that engages others
• inform others.
The three element that are assigned to you have been chosen randomly from three lists. This ensures that your assignment is unique to you. While others might have some of the same elements, no-one else will have exactly the same combination.
Your individual combination has been posted in the form:
[ Disaster ] caused by [ cause ] and triggered by [ wildcard ].
For example: Global Food Shortage caused by Excessive immigration and triggered by Ecstasy.
The wildcard element has been included to give you a chance to be creative and have some fun with the disaster movie trailer part of your submission (see page 2). The wildcard needs to be an integral part of the “story” you put together and also of the systems analysis; however, in the systems analysis, we do need facts and/or plausible system dynamics.
In some cases, the link with your “disaster” and its “cause” will seem obvious. However, your job will be to ensure that you are not trapped by confirmation bias or by focusing too much on the one “cause”. The whole point of systems thinking is to identify other interrelated elements of the systems and note the dynamics between them. Therefore you will need to consider questions such as:
• Is the linked “cause” directly connected to the main element, or elements, of the “disaster”, or are there other factors between them?
• What other elements of the system are connected to the cause and are either affected by it or affect it?
• How many causal loop arrows come to and go from the cause?
• Is the cause really as significant as it seems?
In other cases, you might at first wonder if there is any connection between your allocated “cause” and “disaster” at all. One of the keys of systems thinking is often referred to as the 10,000-metre view. If you are high enough (as in a plane at 10,000 m) you get a very different perspective of the scene below you. So it is with systems thinking, you might need to expand the size of your system and what it contains in order to determine where your allocated cause fits and what effects it has and what effects it causes.
Instructions
What do you have to produce?
A video
A slideshow (which looks like video – so it is a video really) or video comprising three parts:
1 An introductory section in the style of a dramatic trailer for a disaster movie. This should be standard trailer length: i.e. between 90 seconds and 3 minutes.
2 A systems analysis of a real or potentially real system dynamics whereby your assigned disaster could actually happen (or may be actually happening) and how the dynamics are creating that. Where possible, you should use verifiable facts. At the very least, your arguments for the cause–effect dynamics in your systems analysis should be strong inductive arguments (but cogent arguments would be better).
3 Final slides which list your sources, properly referenced, and any credits.
Dramatic Trailer of the Disaster Movie Systems Analysis References & Credits
The minimum output is a self-playing slideshow with voiceover. This can be achieved using any standard slide application (e.g. PowerPoint, Keynote, Google Slides and various open source applications).
You can, of course, go all out and use something like Adobe Premier, Final Cut Pro, iMovie or similar to produce a full movie-quality video. While you might gain some bonus marks from doing this, you will not lose any marks if you don’t.
The minimum duration of your slideshow/video is 6 minutes.
The maximum duration of your slideshow/video is 10 minutes.
Notes on quality
Required features of the slideshow/video:
• It must have a high quality script.
• The narration voice needs to be audible, clear, articulate.
• The sound quality should be high quality.
• Video must be high quality: i.e. no blurry, shaky stuff.
Page 2
What do you have to submit?
• You will upload your video to a suitable place (YouTube, Vimeo, Google Drive, Dropbox, etc.).
• In Moodle you will post a link to your video.
How will you be marked?
Each video will be marked by six or seven other students.
Note: that means you will have to mark six or seven other videos.
You will be provided with a rubric to guide your marking.
When is this due?
Your submission must be made by 2355h on 22 October.
You must complete marking of the assignments assigned to you by 2355h on 5 November.
Page 3
  •  GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

     Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

    Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

     Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

    CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

     Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom