Skip to main content

Frauds are reported in local and national newspapers on an almost daily basis

Your objective is to apply the fraud examination concepts and objectives learned in this course to a real-life fraud case.
Guidelines Frauds are reported in local and national newspapers on an almost daily basis. Please consider several resources, and research any notable fraud case to address the topics noted below.
Then, please write an analysis (2,000–3,500 words) that analyzes this fraud in relation to the course material. Your paper should be submitted as an APA-formatted Word document (and the cover and reference pages are not included in the word count).
In your paper, you should
describe and analyze how the fraud was executed; identify and briefly discuss the role of the parties that were involved as perpetrators, accomplices, victims, tipsters, observers, and so forth (preferably in a chart or illustration) [include Jeffry Picower]; assess the motives (or possible motives, if not reported) of each perpetrator; identify controls that might have deterred or prevented the fraud from occurring; discuss any involvement of the SEC; document how the fraud was discovered and investigated, including what should have been identified as red flags; discuss the resolution of this case; and cite and reference any articles, other texts, journals, websites, or so forth that you used as a source for the facts in your paper. NOTE: Avoid Wikipedia, because it is not recognized as a credible, authoritative source. Be sure to review the grading rubric below so you can earn the maximum number of points (including proper APA citations and a references page).
Milestones In Week 2, you will provide a two-paragraph description of the fraud you choose as the subject of your Research Project. This will be worth 25 points. In Week 7, you will complete the requirements as noted on the document in the Files section concerning the Research Project. This will be worth 145 points. Grading Rubrics Category Points % Description First Draft or First Deliverable 25 15% This consists of two paragraphs providing a short description of the fraud you choose as the subject of your Research Project. Documentation and Formatting 10 6% Paper should follow designated guidelines. Citations and references are used appropriately. Organization and Cohesiveness 10 6% Structure of the answers is clear and easy to follow. Editing 10 6% Grammar and spelling is correct. Sentence structure is appropriate. Content 115 67% Content is comprehensive and accurate. Major points are adequately stated and address course concepts. Content and purpose of the answers is clear. Total 170 100 A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
  •  GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

     Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

    Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

     Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

    CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

     Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom