Skip to main content

Using the findings from Assignment 3, use charts/graphs or statistical measures to interpret and analyse the data (ACs 3.1, 3.2). Critical reflection has been used to evaluate own work and justify valid conclusions: conclusions have been arrived at though synthesis of ideas and have been justified (D1, AC 3.2)

Research methods
Paper details 

Assignment Tasks (Lecturers must link assessment criteria to questions as below)


Using the findings from Assignment 3, use charts/graphs or statistical measures to interpret and analyse the data (ACs 3.1, 3.2). Critical reflection has been used to evaluate own work and justify valid conclusions: conclusions have been arrived at though synthesis of ideas and have been justified (D1, AC 3.2)

Then, you should make conclusions and recommendations of your findings (AC 3.3). In making recommendations and justifying areas for further consideration, convergent or lateral or creative thinking have been demonstrated: innovation and creative thought have been applied (D3) 

You must follow the agreed format to present the outcome of your Research findings (AC 4.1). In presenting the research outcomes, the appropriate structure and approach has been used in presenting and communicating the research report findings (M3).

Guidance to Students

Your data analysis could include charts, graphs or statistical measures. Here you could use pie charts, line graphs, histograms, bar graphs as means to display data. You can also use tabulate data. You can use one or two of them or a combination to make recommendations and conclusions related to your research topic. When you come to conclusions, you should justify the synthesis of ideas.

You need to also discuss the implications of the results for practice or for future research on the topic. This will require drawing inferences and conclusions from the results. It may involve discussing theoretical and practical consequences of the results. There should also be some focus on whether or not questions/hypotheses were supported.

When interpreting the findings, you should address if the questions/hypotheses were supported or refuted. You could also address here if the results might have occurred because of inadequate experimental procedures, such as threats to internal validity, and indicate how the results might be generalised to certain people, settings and times. Finally, you should indicate the implications of the results for the population studied for future research.

When you make your justifications for your findings, you should provide convincing evidence (could be based on your primary data) that supports your ideas/arguments or provide adequate grounds for decisions and conclusions and answer the main objections likely to be made.

You must cover M3 (see above in the assignment task) of the Merit criteria.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom