Skip to main content

Study design -Is it a questionnaire study or a laboratory experiment? What kind of design do you choose (descriptive, cross-sectional, case-control)?

1
How to write a good postgraduate research proposal
General Rules
Contents:
 Be clear, objective and realistic in your objectives
 Ask yourself why this research is important
 State and justify your objectives clearly
 Make sure you answer the questions: how will the research benefit the wider society
or contribute to the research community?
Styles:
 Provide a ‘catchy’ title
 Structure your text
 Present the information in short paragraphs rather than a solid block of text
 Write short sentences
 If allowed, provide images/charts/diagrams which may help break up the text
Structure for a Research Proposal
1. Title
2. Abstract (summary of the proposed researched 100-200 words)
3. Introduction (background information/brief summary of existing literature)
4. Hypothesis and main objectives
5. Methodology, research design, participants, procedure, material, analysis
6. Summary and conclusion
7. References
8. Appendices
2
Writing the Proposal
Important Components
Title:
Well-presented and clearly written proposals are more likely to stick in people’s mind. Avoid
long and convoluted titles. You will get an opportunity to give more detail in your
introduction
Plagiarism:
Make sure that you acknowledge the authors of ALL publications you use to write your
proposal. Failure to do so will be considered as plagiarism. Do not copy word to word what
an author has said. It is best to analyse and re-write all borrowed information in your own
words. If you absolutely have to quote an author, and then make sure that you use quotations
marks.
Abstract:
An abstract is a brief summary written in the same style as the rest of our proposal. It will
provide your reader with the main points and conclusions of your proposal.
Introduction and Literature Review:
A well-written introduction is the most efficient way to ‘hook’ your reader and set the context
of your proposed research. Get the reader’s attention early on and do no waste space with
obvious and general statements. The introduction is your opportunity to demonstrate that
your research has not been done before and that the proposed project will really add
something new to the existing body of literature. Your proposal does not have to
extraordinary, but it has to be based on sound hypotheses and reasoning.
You will have to provide background information in the form of a literature review which
helps you set the context for your research, to help the reader understand the questions and
objectives. You will also be expected to show that you have a good knowledge of the body of
literature, the wider context in which your research belongs and that you have awareness of
methodologies, theories and conflicting evidence in your chosen field.
Choose key research papers or public documents and explain clearly how your research will
either fill a gap, complete or follow on from previous research even if it is a relatively new
field.
Methodology:
The methodology identifies the data collection and analytical techniques that you intend to
use. You should propose a quantitative study.
3
For quantitative studies, the method section typically consists of the following sections:
 Study design -Is it a questionnaire study or a laboratory experiment? What kind of
design do you choose (descriptive, cross-sectional, case-control)?
 Selection of research location
 Subjects or participants - Who will take part in your study? What kind of sampling
method / procedure do you use? You will need to decide on the inclusion and
exclusion criteria
 Sample size – you need to calculate your sample size based on the type of study you
are conducting. There are several formulas for sample size calculation.
 Study instruments - What kind of measuring instruments or questionnaires do you
use? Why do you choose them? Are they valid and reliable?
 Data collection - How do you plan to carry out your study? What activities are
involved? How long does it take?
 Data analysis and interpretation – this includes plans for processing and coding data,
computer software to be used (eg Statistical Package for Social Sciences / SPSS, EPI-
INFO, etc), choice of statistical methods, significance levels etc.
 Ethical considerations – It is necessary to identify any ethical components especially
if you are using invasive procedures for human subjects. For instance:
o Consent forms (which state overall purpose and any risks or benefits of
participating).
o Potential risks that could be involved in any questioning (emotional distress,
dignity).
o Confidentiality of participants (anonymity).
o Feedback of results to participants.
Important Note:
o Make sure the research design or approach is appropriate for the stated
objectives
o Do not assume the reviewers are familiar with techniques to be used in your
study
o Provide a brief description of the study location, study design and flow of
activities
Summary and Conclusions:
Present an indication on how you envisage your research will contribute to debates and
discussions in your particular subject area. Will it make an original contribution? How might
it fill gaps in existing work or extend understanding of particular topics? Which are the
expected results? Summarize the research proposal’s main points.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom