The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of
the professional nurse as an educator. You are to prepare a patient
scenario based on the required assigned topic. You will choose an
already developed and reliable mHealth app to use in the education of
your patient.
Based on your accepted Milestone 1 assignment, use the information to
identify three teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. You will also
determine three ways to evaluate the success of the patient's use of
the mHealth app. You will include both the mHealth application and a
scholarly journal reference in APA format.
Course Outcomes
The Course Project enables the student to meet the following course
outcomes:
CO1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the
needs of a diverse patient population. (PO1)
CO5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and
communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO5)
Points
The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 2 is worth 225 points
of this total.
Due Date
Submit your completed NR361 Milestone 2 by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, at the
end of Week 4. You may consult the Policies section in the Introduction
& Resources module for details regarding late assignments. Post
questions about this assignment in the Course Q & A Forum.
Required Assigned Topic
Required Assigned Topic for the focus of your paper.
• Stress Management
Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app
you identified in Week 2.
Requirements and Guidelines
Download the required Milestone 2 Template. (Links to an external site.)
Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361
Milestone 2.docx.
Briefly state the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment.
Include revisions, if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes.
Information to be taught to patient should include information about the
mHealth app, safety, guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the
information that is provided.
Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the
patient’s use of the mHealth app.
Remember to cite when appropriate
You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools
required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013
(or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for
MAC. You must save the file in the ".docx" format. Do NOT save as Word
Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which
is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the
student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.)
Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 2 and type
directly on your saved Milestone 2 Template.
Complete all rubric areas for a superior Milestone 2.
Use instructor feedback from Milestone 1 to improve your statements
regarding the patient scenario in Milestone 2.
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All
students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it
in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content
contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited
appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this
assignment.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
NOTE: Please use your browser's File setting to save or print this page.
Rubric
NR361 Milestone 2
NR361 Milestone 2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefine: Approved Patient
Scenario from Milestone 1
Brief statement of the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment,
including revisions if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
30.0 pts
Defines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1
including excellent details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1
instructor feedback).
26.0 pts
Defines (states) the brief patient scenario from Milestone 1 including
good details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor
feedback).
24.0 pts
Defines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1
including fair details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1
instructor feedback).
12.0 pts
Definition of brief patient scenario is poorly done and/or revisions did
not adhere to feedback from instructor on Milestone 1
0.0 pts
Does not define (state) the nursing issue.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeach:
Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Information to
be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app,
safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that
is provided. Remember to use bullet points.
75.0 pts
Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Excellent
details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines
for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information
of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.
66.0 pts
Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Good details
includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for
mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of
the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.
60.0 pts
Identifies 2 or 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Fair data
includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for
mHealth application, and/or how to interpret and act on the information
of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points or information is
not clear.
29.0 pts
Identifies 1-2 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Poor data
includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for
mHealth application, OR how to interpret and act on the information of
the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points AND information is
not clear.
0.0 pts
Did not identify teaching measures to improve patient outcomes.
75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate:
Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the
patient’s use of the mHealth app. Cite when appropriate. Remember to use
bullet points.
75.0 pts
Describe in excellent detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the
success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet
points.
66.0 pts
Describes in good detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of
the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.
60.0 pts
Describes in fair detail 2-3 ways to determine and evaluate the success
of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. May not use bullet points or
information is not clear.
29.0 pts
Describes in poor detail 1-2 ways to determine and evaluate the success
of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Does not use bullet points AND
information is not clear.
0.0 pts
Did not identify ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of
the mHealth app.
75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and References:
Include citations and references for the mHealth application in APA
format and a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article related to the
patient scenario published within the past 5 years.
30.0 pts
Excellent citations and references in APA format for both the mHealth
application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5
years old
26.0 pts
Good citations and references with minor errors in APA format for
both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed
journal that is less than 5 years old
24.0 pts
Citations and references with some errors in APA format for both/either
the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is
less than 5 years old
12.0 pts
Citations and references with numerous errors in APA format for the
mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal.
0.0 pts
Did not cite or reference in APA format.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
contains no spelling or grammatical errors. Reading level is appropriate
for patient described.
15.0 pts
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct; Reading level
appropriate for patient.
13.0 pts
Good mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column
12.0 pts
Fair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.
6.0 pts
Poor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column
0.0 pts
Very poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect Topic and correct
Template Use
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
Correct topic and correct template used for the assignment
0.0 pts
22.5 points deducted (10%)
Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 22.5 point
deduction (10%).
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
Submitted on time
0.0 pts
Not Submitted on Time - Points Deducted
1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75
deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5
deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0.0 pts
Total Points: 225.0
Part 1Title: Lab ResponseDiscuss one feature of MS Word and one feature of MS Excel that you found challenging within the lab and why. Examples are WordArt, inserting shapes, adding borders, cell styles, etc. This response should be at least one paragraph in length. Part 2Title: History of Computers Identify and discuss a key milestone in the history of computers that interests you and why. This section should be at least one paragraph. Part 3Title: System Software vs. Application Software In your words, explain the difference between application software and system software as if to another coworker who has limited technical knowledge. Use examples to support your rationalization. This section should be at least two paragraphs. Part 4Title: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency In a minimum of one paragraph each: 1. Conduct some research on the internet and discuss one underlying technology of cryptocurrencies like blockchain, cryptography, distributed ledger technol...
Comments
Post a Comment