Skip to main content

Phil Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in social psychology.

Phil Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in social psychology. In this study, young men were put into a prison simulation, randomly assigned to the role of prisoners or guards. What happened over the course of the experiment ignited controversy and raised important questions about the power of the situation to shape our behaviors.
· Watch the documentary describing the research: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIUlBrvqyyo
· Read about the study on the official website: http://www.prisonexp.org/
Your Assignment:
Choose two of the external factors that affect reasoning that you believe can help explain the events of the SPE. Choose two from the following list:
· Conformity (including normative or informational conformity)
· Obedience
· Cialdini's principles of persuasion (do not need to use all 7 in your essay)
· Group biases
· Cognitive dissonance
· Confirmation bias
· Fundamental attribution error For each of the two external factors you select, you must:
· Describe the relevant external factor, and if applicable, research evidence supporting it. Summarize the information in your own words – Do not quote the Powerpoint slides.
· Describe the specific element or elements of the SPE that you wish to discuss. It could be a specific aspect of the experiment's procedure or an event that occurred during the course of the study. You may consider the actions not only of the prisoners and guards, but also of others involved in the study (e.g., the volunteers' families who visited, the researchers themselves). Do not provide too much detail in summarizing the events of the SPE - You can assume your reader is familiar with the SPE, so just provide enough information to orient your reader.
· Describe how the external factor you have identified can aid in understanding the event(s) above. Make sure to explain why this external factor is useful in understanding this event. Note: Make sure your discussion of the above uses a sophisticated understanding of this concept, i.e. don’t just use the common understanding of a concept that you or layman would have without learning the material in this class. For example, if you discuss bias, don’t just refer to some prejudice or stubbornness as a ‘bias’. If you discuss conformity, don’t just say that the person conformed or went along with a group
Guidelines
- Your paper should be no more than 1000 words long (should be approximately 3-3.5 double spaced pages).
  •  GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

     Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

    Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

     Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

    CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

     Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom