Skip to main content

HEALTH POLICY POSITION STATEMENT

HEALTH POLICY POSITION STATEMENT
Overview
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010) is changing the way health care is delivered, and there are still issues which remain to be fully addressed with respect to health policy. In this assignment, you will select an aspect of health care reform which warrants continued and additional policy consideration. Examples might include: improving access to care, minimizing disparities in care, enhancing privacy protection of personal health records, et cetera.
As you conduct research to investigate facts related to your selected policy dilemma, you will create proposed solutions to minimize gaps. Finally, you will construct a health care policy statement which is supported with evidence (from authoritative government sources, peer-reviewed research, et cetera). The final product for this assignment is a substantive, yet succinct, policy position statement which is based upon comprehensive research of credible, authoritative sources. Your position statement should address an existing gap in some aspect of health care reform.
Steps
Identify a framework, example, or structure for construction of a health policy position statement. Hint: Research government Web sites, the American College of Healthcare Executives Web site, and databases in the Capella library.
Select an aspect of health care reform, and create a rationale statement for why the topic warrants further discussion and policy consideration. Examples include: improved access to care for rural or physically challenged people, minimizing health care disparities among subpopulations, improving protection of personal health record privacy, et cetera.
Using your research findings, create a summary of relevant legal, ethical, and related information (for example, pro and con positions) which describes the nature, extent, and intensity of the problem.
Propose solutions to minimize gaps or inequalities for your selected topic.
Requirements
Length of paper: 3–5 double-spaced, typed pages. Your paper should be succinct, yet substantive.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (current edition) style and formatting.
Resources: Use evidence from authoritative, scholarly literature to support your recommendations.
Turnitin: Run your assignment through Turnitin before submitting it, and include the matched percentage in your assignment submission.
Target maximum match is 5–10 percent. To reduce the match percentage, please do not submit the reference list with your original content. Once the report is received, scan for lengthy passages of highlighted areas; you may wish to paraphrase rather than quote, or analyze rather than describe the content presented by the original author. If you need additional assistance, you may contact the Capella Writing Center.
Websites:
https://www.ashrm.org/
https://www.ahrq.gov

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom