Skip to main content

Defining what sustainability and liveability means to a community (group)

  1. Defining what sustainability and liveability means to a community (group)

In this section, each team member is required to (1) interview 5 people in their local community (e.g., family, neighbours) about what the terms Sustainability and Liveability mean to them (i.e., how they define these terms), and what makes, or would make, their suburb liveable (i.e., indicators of liveability).

The group then decides on one suburb as the focus of the study and provides (1) a description of the suburb or study area and (2) a demographic profile of the residents using the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Census data. Specific variables to be examined in the profile include: age, gender, income, education, unemployment, and ethnicity.

(In our research, we our doing SOUTHBANK PARKLANDS IN BRISBANE).

  1. Researching key indicators of liveability (Individual)

In this section, based on the initial research, the group must select a range of indicators of liveability to examine within their chosen suburb. Each group member will focus on one specific indicator and develop (1) a literature review on the topic/s as they relate to urban development, lifestyles and liveability. Sources should include: relevant academic journals and books, as well as government reports and statistics (2) an assessment of supply/provision of relevant infrastructure/facilities/programs/services in the area in relation to their chosen indicator’ and (3) an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of current provision and the potential for further development. This section should contain written information but also, where appropriate, maps, photos and diagrams to illustrate existing conditions.

(In this part, I am require to do SAFETY as a range of indicator of liveability in SOUTHBANK PARKLANDS) PLEASE MAKE SURE WITH THIS PART AS THIS IS THE INDIVIDUAL PART AND THIS IS THE PART WHERE WE WILL BE MARKED DIFFERENTLY.

  1. Analysing research evidence (Group)

In this section, the group comes together to compile a list of key findings (positive and negative) based on the individual research sections. For example, these may include problems that should be fixed as well as areas of interest that, with development, could enhance sustainability and liveability in the community.

  1. Formulating plans for change (Group)

In this section, the group needs to identify, where appropriate and feasible, broad ideas for change that will solve identified problems and/or enhance positive attributes in order to secure the future sustainability and liveability of the community

REFERENCE: APA 6th format. And make sure to put the references for the photos, maps and diagrams that are required in number (2).

PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY! THANK YOU!

WORD COUNT: 800 WORDS!



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom