Skip to main content

Clear and incisive analysis of relevant information in capital

Question 1: 50 marks

High Distinction 5

Distinction 4

Credit 3.5

Pass 2.5 -3

Needs more work < 2.5

  1. Cash Flow schedule

(5 marks)

NPV correct within: +/- 10%

NPV correct within: +/- 10% – 20%

NPV correct within:

+/- 20% – 30%

NPV correct within:

+/- 30% – 40%

NPV not correct within 40%

  1. Calculate NPV

(10 marks)

[Total: 15 marks]

NPV correct within: +/- 10%

NPV correct within: +/- 10% – 20%

NPV correct within:

+/- 20% – 30%

NPV correct within:

+/- 30% – 40%

NPV not correct within 40%

15 marks total

High Distinction 9-10

Distinction 8

Credit 7

Pass 5-6

Needs more work <5

  1. Calculate IRR

(3 marks)

  1. Calculate Profitability index (3 marks)

  2. Calculate Payback period

(4 marks)

[Total: 10 marks]

0 or 1 mistake

2 mistakes

3 mistakes

4 or 5 mistakes

5+ mistakes

25 Marks Total

High Distinction 17 +

Distinction 15 – 17

Credit 12 – 15

Pass 10 – 12

Needs more work <10

In reference to method 2-6:

  1. Explain why project is/is not acceptable. Discussion on NPV, IRR, PI, and payback period.

(25 marks).

[Total: 50 marks]

Clear and incisive analysis of relevant information in capital budgeting models. Developed understanding of key capital budgeting decision criteria.

Competent analysis of relevant information in capital budgeting models. Solid understanding of key capital budgeting decision criteria.

Surface level analysis of relevant information in capital budgeting models. Some understanding of key capital budgeting decision criteria but with significant gaps.

Very limited analysis of relevant information in capital budgeting models. Little understanding of key capital budgeting decision criteria.

Insufficient analysis in most areas.

Mark awarded and Comment



Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom