Outlines a Description of the Project Area that Includes all Pertinent Information Total: 1.50 Distinguished – Expertly outlines a detailed description of the project and includes all pertinent information. Proficient – Outlines a clear description of the project and includes pertinent information. Minor details are missing. Basic – Minimally outlines a description of the project and includes some pertinent information. Relevant details are missing. Below Expectations – Attempts to outline a detailed description of the project and includes minimal information; however, significant details are missing. Non-Performance – The outline of a description of the project and all pertinent information is omitted.
Outlines a Description of the Project Area that Includes all Pertinent Information
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Expertly outlines a detailed description of the project and includes all pertinent information.
Proficient – Outlines a clear description of the project and includes pertinent information. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines a description of the project and includes some pertinent information. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outline a detailed description of the project and includes minimal information; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of a description of the project and all pertinent information is omitted.
Outlines the scope of the Plan Focusing Around One of the Four Scenarios That Addressess All Necessary Components
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Expertly outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses all necessary components.
Proficient – Outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses necessary components. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses some necessary components. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses a few necessary components; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of the scope of the plan focusing on one of the four scenarios and details of all necessary components is omitted.
Outlines At Least Three Legitimate Alternatives To The Plan and The No Build Alternative
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Expertly outlines three or more legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative.
Proficient – Outlines at least three legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines at least three legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outlines at least two legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative;however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative is omitted.
Outlines At Least One Criteria From Each Chapter In Relation To The Proposed Site
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Expertly outlines one or more criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site.
Proficient – Outlines at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outline at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site;however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site is omitted.
Outlines a Conclusion That Summarizes the Environmental Impact Statement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Provides an exceptional conclusion that thoroughly summarizes the environmental impact statement.
Proficient – Provides an adequate conclusion that summarizes the environmental impact statement. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Provides a limited conclusion that partially summarizes the environmental impact statement. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a conclusion that summarizes the environmental impact statement; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – A conclusion that summarizes the environmental impact statement is missing.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
APA Formatting
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Source Requirement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Expertly outlines a detailed description of the project and includes all pertinent information.
Proficient – Outlines a clear description of the project and includes pertinent information. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines a description of the project and includes some pertinent information. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outline a detailed description of the project and includes minimal information; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of a description of the project and all pertinent information is omitted.
Outlines the scope of the Plan Focusing Around One of the Four Scenarios That Addressess All Necessary Components
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Expertly outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses all necessary components.
Proficient – Outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses necessary components. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses some necessary components. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outlines the scope of the plan, focusing on one of the four scenarios that addresses a few necessary components; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of the scope of the plan focusing on one of the four scenarios and details of all necessary components is omitted.
Outlines At Least Three Legitimate Alternatives To The Plan and The No Build Alternative
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Expertly outlines three or more legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative.
Proficient – Outlines at least three legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines at least three legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outlines at least two legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative;however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of legitimate alternatives to the plan and the no build alternative is omitted.
Outlines At Least One Criteria From Each Chapter In Relation To The Proposed Site
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Expertly outlines one or more criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site.
Proficient – Outlines at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally outlines at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to outline at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site;however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The outline of at least one criteria from each chapter as related to the proposed site is omitted.
Outlines a Conclusion That Summarizes the Environmental Impact Statement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Provides an exceptional conclusion that thoroughly summarizes the environmental impact statement.
Proficient – Provides an adequate conclusion that summarizes the environmental impact statement. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Provides a limited conclusion that partially summarizes the environmental impact statement. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a conclusion that summarizes the environmental impact statement; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – A conclusion that summarizes the environmental impact statement is missing.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
APA Formatting
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Source Requirement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Comments
Post a Comment