Main Corporate governance issues addressed, explained and importance of issue regognised ? 2.Firms response addressed/expected outcome addressed? What has been their response , in my view have they done enough , risk management measure in place ?
1-Purpose of case study
2.Importance of case
3.Company profile
4.Description of events
This should be 1250 words
2.Importance of case
3.Company profile
4.Description of events
This should be 1250 words
1.Main Corporate governance issues addressed, explained and importance of issue regognised ?
2.Firms response addressed/expected outcome addressed? What has been their response , in my view have they done enough , risk management measure in place ?
3.Reference made to appropriate literature and comparisons drawn? Thoeries , or code , who ever wrote about corportate governance
4.Have they done anything to society , could we have economic crisis. is uk government giving too much flexibility
5.in corporate governance law and code,, should UK do what us legislation
6.General lessons learnt? Analyse this case,, what is the overall outcome ,, there is a lot going on behind the scene and there are more public doesn’t know about.
7.Would you invest in this firm?
8.Additional discussion question (optional )
2.Firms response addressed/expected outcome addressed? What has been their response , in my view have they done enough , risk management measure in place ?
3.Reference made to appropriate literature and comparisons drawn? Thoeries , or code , who ever wrote about corportate governance
4.Have they done anything to society , could we have economic crisis. is uk government giving too much flexibility
5.in corporate governance law and code,, should UK do what us legislation
6.General lessons learnt? Analyse this case,, what is the overall outcome ,, there is a lot going on behind the scene and there are more public doesn’t know about.
7.Would you invest in this firm?
8.Additional discussion question (optional )
9. conclusion
it will be good to have some qoute from any corporate governance books
ACF528: Continuous Assessment 3
2015/16
Case Study and Analysis (60%)
The final assessment for the module is to be undertaken individually. Each student will be required to prepare an original case study (1,250 words max) and analysis (3,750 words max). Each student is required to identify a company/organisation in which a corporate governance/ethical issue/dilemma has arisen. Students are not allowed to choose a firm case covered in the module textbook, Tricker (2015)
For their chosen company, each student is required to write and analyse a case study looking at the key corporate governance/ethical issues within the case.
Students are advised to use the SWIF (Student Written, Instructor Facilitated) approach in preparation for their case study.
The case study and analysis forms 60% of the final module mark. The marks awarded for each element of the case study are as follows:
Component | Total |
Student Case Study (1,250 words) | 15% |
Student Case Analysis (3,750 words) | 45% |
SWIF Learning: A Guide to Student Written, Instructor Facilitated Case Writing
Each student will find online a paper written by Professor Paul Swiercz on the SWIF approach to be used for the continuous assessment for the module. The following identifies applicable and non-applicable sections of this paper for the purposes of preparing the continuous assessment for ACF528:
Section | Applicable/Non-Applicable? | Notes |
Introduction | Applicable | |
Why Write and Study Cases? | Applicable | |
What is a Case Study? | Applicable | |
Where Do I Begin? | Applicable | General points in this section for writing your case are important and should be taken into consideration.
You are not required to contact or interview employees/directors of your chosen organisation.
|
Writing the Case | Applicable | Subsection 1 ‘Defining a Purpose’ is applicable.
Subsection 2 ‘Finding a Case Site and Subject’ is applicable.
Subsection 3 ‘Selling yourself and the Idea’ is non- applicable.
Subsection 4 ‘Caveats’ is applicable.
|
Ethical Concerns | Applicable | General points are important. Again note that you are not required to contact or interview employees/directors of your chosen organisation. |
Releases | Non-applicable | |
Preparing the Case | Applicable | Subsection 1 ‘Organisation’ is applicable.
Subsection 2 ‘Collecting the Data’: You are not required to interview participants. Therefore, information on interviewing participants in this subsection is non-applicable.
The Subsection ‘Informational Interviewing’ is non-applicable.
Subsection 3 ‘Writing the Narrative’ is applicable.
Subsection 4 ‘Discussion Questions’. While your discussion questions are provided below, a thorough case study can develop its own discussion questions over and above those listed below.
|
After the Case is Written | Non- Applicable | Non- Applicable |
Sources | Applicable | However, use University Library resources. |
The World Wide Web | Applicable | These websites are only suggestions. Information can be drawn from any appropriate website. However, data used must come from verifiable sources – see ‘Where Do I Begin?’ section of paper. |
Appendix A | Applicable | |
Appendix B | Applicable | This should appear in your final case study. |
Appendix C | Non-Applicable | |
Case-Writing Guide | Applicable |
Case Study Analysis
Each student must choose a company/organisation for investigation but students cannot choose a company on which a case has been written in the module textbook, Tricker (2015). Each student should conduct research into their chosen firm/organisation and prepare their case study and analysis on the issues/events/dilemmas that have taken place. As regards the analysis of the case, each student is required to address the following discussion questions:
- What were the main corporate governance issues within this case?
- What does the theoretical, academic, professional or legal literature/regulation say on these issues? Were such events or features of your case consistent with or in contrast to the theoretical, academic, professional or legal literature/regulation?
- If the company/organisation addressed these issues, was the response appropriate? Did it address the fundamental issues at stake? If a response has yet to emerge, what would you expect a suitable response to be and why?
- Could similar events happen again in the UK today? Why? Do you think the current system of corporate governance and accountability in the UK is sufficient to deal with these issues?
- What were the general lessons learnt from this case? What have you as a student learnt about governance, risk and ethics from this case?
- Would you invest in this firm? Give the reasons for your decision.
Students may also develop their own discussion questions for inclusion in the case. Additional issues that emerge in the course of your analysis may be presented here and should be reported under the heading ‘Other discussion points’.
2884685
Suggested Case Structure
The following may be used as a guide to help structure your case:
Case Study
- Introduction: Purpose of study, importance of case, structure of case study.
- Context: Provide background and context to the case by providing an overview of the firm(s)/organisation(s) involved within the case.
- Description of key events that took place within the case.
Case Study Analysis
- Address discussion questions.
- Conclusions: Summary of case study, summary of key findings and their implications for corporate governance.
- Bibliography and references.
Notes Regarding Continuous Assessment Submission:
All citations from books, journals, articles, websites and interviews appearing in the continuous assessment must be properly referenced. The continuous assessment should be typed. The bibliography word count does not form part of the word count for the assessment.
The deadline for submission of the continuous assessment is Wednesday 9thDecember at 12.00 noon.
Note that 10 marks will be deducted for each week or part thereof, that the continuous assessments are submitted late.
Comments
Post a Comment