Skip to main content

Evaluate four current strategies. Consider all relevant strategies and select four.

Part B: (1500 words approximately)
Summary SWOT: This will be based on the strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats you identified as part of your internal and external analysis in Part A.
Strategy evaluation
Evaluate four current strategies. Consider all relevant strategies and select four. This could include all or many of the following: business level strategy, diversification, acquisitions/mergers, international strategy and/or co-operative strategies.
Problems/Challenges and recommendation
Identify three main strategic issues.
In this section you should outline a range of strategic actions for the company: where to from now to resolve the three significant strategic issues/challenges identified. You should consider the threats, weaknesses and risks of strategies in identifying strategic issues/challenges. You should recommend some alternative actions and justify your choice in terms of the company’s SWOT analysis. To link together the results of the external and internal environmental analysis, you could use the TOWS matrix.
Conclusion (major results of your analysis and recommendations with regards to the main strategic issues identified)
The report (Part A and B) should be prepared in a professional manner. This means that the
© Laureate International Universities 2016

MGT302A Strategic Audit Brief
report should be concise, incisive, and literate and include appropriate supporting tables, charts, and exhibits.
There must be clear evidence of consultation of academic literature – at least 5 academic journals articles, recommended text and several web sites must be used, and appropriately referenced in accordance with the THINK referencing guide
PLEASE NOTE:
This is a very important assessment and is being done individually. You have to select ONE of the following companies for your audit:
Uber
or
Tesla
or
Zara
Due dates: Week 6 (Part A) and week 9 (Part B). However please ensure that you work consistently over the 9 weeks.
The following is a schedule to help you stay on track:
Week 2: Select your organisation. Introduction.
Weeks 3-4: Data collection. You need to collect information on the EXTERNAL
ENVIRONMENT, which includes the general environment, industry environment, competitors (2-3 will suffice).
Complete the analysis (identify opportunities and threats) and writing of this section.
Weeks 5: Collect information on the INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT, which should include resources, capabilities and core competencies
Week 6: Complete the analysis (identify strengths and weaknesses) and writing this section.
SUBMIT PART A
Week 7: Review Part A and do a summary SWOT. Select four strategies.
Week 8: Complete the analysis of the four strategies and identify three significant strategic issues.
Week 9: Recommendations and Conclusion. SUBMIT PART B

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom