Skip to main content

Good alignment across your study components is critical for several reasons.

Alignment Audits and Modifications
Good alignment across your study components is critical for several reasons. A well-aligned study will have methodological rigor, meaning your research will be of higher scholarly quality and the knowledge to be generated will bring more value to your discipline. A well-designed study will reflect that you have a solid understanding of the nature of the proposed research and the application of a given research method and research design to your topic. A well-aligned study will support implementation of the research plan with fidelity to the research design, helping you to achieving your research objectives and answer your research questions. A well-aligned Prospectus is much more likely to be approved by your chair, committee member, and/or URR, allowing you to move forward with your dissertation research..
As you work towards completing the first full draft of your Prospectus, now is the time to assess your complete work. In order to correct for misalignment, you must first assess your study components, element by element, for congruence to identify where misalignment exists. Complete Activity 1, Activity 2, and Activity 3, all of which are found in this week’s Learning Resources.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post the following:
All three completed Activity documents, which function as an alignment audit of your work and required modifications to your Prospectus draft, if any, to take place based upon your audit
A completed Change Matrix form, which, if completed correctly, will evidence that you successfully integrated the feedback from your peers (when appropriate to do so) and various Real Time Updates and guidance postings made by the Instructor to you and your classmates during Weeks 2 through 5. Please note that the grading rubric for this Discussion includes criteria and point values for the change matrix activity. Points will be earned based upon how well prior revision requests and recommendations are integrated into this Discussion posting.
  • CapitalEssayWriting.com is a company which offers academic support and assistance to students. Our mission is to provide high quality academic services to our clients. This is done through quality writing and consistent follow-up of the students’ instructions. At CapitalEssayWriting.com, we have highly qualified and competent writers to handle any of your projects. Our past quality projects and assignments ideally speak for themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom