Skip to main content

ACTIVITY INSTRUCTION IN THIS ASSIGNMENT, YOU WILL SUBMIT YOUR FINAL OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN (OIP) USING THE TOYOTA 2009 RECALL. YOUR FINAL OIP SHOULD BE DIVIDED INTO FIVE BASIC COMPONENTS: PROCESS IDENTIFICATION. PROCESS IMPROVEMENT.

Activity Instruction In this assignment, you will submit your final operations improvement plan (OIP) using the Toyota 2009 Recall. Your final OIP should be divided into five basic components:

Process Identification. Process Improvement. Defining the Problem Statement. Measurement Strategy. Data Collection and Evaluation Tools. You have developed each of these components as individual assignments and you have updated them as your OIP has developed. Take into consideration all of the research and groundwork you have completed thus far. Incorporate feedback from previous assignments as well as the tools, techniques, and methodologies you have examined throughout the course. Finalize your comprehensive OIP as if you were to present it as a formal recommendation to the organizational leaders of the Toyota Motor Corporation. Focus your writing appropriately for that audience.

Your final OIP should include the following elements:

A problem statement, including an overview of the Toyota recall crisis, with a brief history and description of the situation. A description of the key challenge or problem you have chosen to address in Toyota’s organizational processes, and an analysis of its organizational impact, based on theories and models of global operations management. An executive summary of the collected and processed data (actual data, if possible, or assumed data, if necessary). A cost-benefit analysis based on your data. A description of your innovative and sustainable solution that reflects strategic global operations management concepts and practices. Your recommendations for supporting the improvement of the selected process, based on practices of global operations management. An explanation of the data or findings that validates your recommendations. The visuals, diagrams, and flowcharts you have developed to support and integrate your analysis into general business management planning and decision-making processes. A conclusion. A comprehensive reference list. Submission Requirements Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting. Resources: Minimum of 4 sources required. Length of paper: 5–10 typed, double-spaced pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom