Routine versus Clincally Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous CathetersCapstone Project Proposal
Routine versus Clincally Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous CathetersCapstone Project Proposal
Project Title
Write the name of your project....See topic Above
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This should be a half page detailed description of what exactly your Project is.
PROJECT RATIONALE
Two to three paragraphs stating the need for, and justification of, selecting this Project topic. Who will benefit and how will they benefit from this project? Who are the major stakeholders?
PERSONAL/PROFESSIONAL EXPECTATIONS
One to two paragraphs on what you hope to gain from this Project, both professionally and personally.
PROJECT GOALS
List and explain the goals of your Project. This section should address, in detail, a description of your project, what you plan to do and how you will achieve it.
PICO(T) Question
This should be a question that meets the criteria for PICO(T)
RESEARCH
Your project should also include a review of the existing research on your topic and a discussion comparing this research to your project focus. Knowing that you have already competed your literature review by this time, be sure to synthesize the research you presented in your presentation here. PLEASE USE THESE RESEARCH ARTICLES:
Boyd S, Aggarwal, Davey, Logan and Nathwani, (2011) Peripheral intravenous catheters: the road to quality improvement and safer patient care. Jan;77(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
Hasselberg, D., Ivarsson, B., Andersson, R., & Tingstedt, B. (2010). The handling of peripheral venous catheters - from non-compliance to evidence-based needs D Hasselberg et al. The handling of PVCs. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 19(23/24), 3358-3363. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03410.x
Ho, K., & Cheung, D. (2012). Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 21(11/12), 1499-1506. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03974.x
Rickard, C. M., Webster, J., Wallis, M. C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M. R., French, V., & ... Whitby, M. (2012). Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet, 380(9847), 1066-1074
Procedure
A step-by-step analysis of how you intend to meet your goals, including resources you will need, where you intend to find them, and an estimated timeline of how long each step will take. THIS A MAJOR SECTION OF YOUR PROPOSAL.
RECOMMENDATIONS
One half page to one whole page on your Project recommendations. By now, you have completed your proposal and have sifted through the literature. You should have a firm grasp on the problem and how you feel it should be solved, based on the evidence. You know you have a problem and you should discuss how you plan to solve it. Discuss those recommendations here.
EVALUATION
One half a page to one whole page on how your Project is to be evaluated. What specifically will make your project a success, both to you and to others? This won’t be a formal evaluation, but will simply be a plan of how you would evaluate, so just describe how you would evaluate this project for effectiveness if time permitted. Also, be sure to describe the purpose of your evaluation.
Format:
This paper should be formated in APA format with the topics of each section listed as a Level 2 heading (See APA manual, 6th Ed, page 62).
Before finalizing your work, you should:
be sure to read the Assignment description carefully
consult the Grading Rubric to make sure you have included everything necessary;
utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; and
review APA formatting and citation information
Your writing Assignment should:
have proper punctuation and grammar
be well organized, as well as original and insightful ;
contain excellent content, properly organized thoughts; and
use APA 6th edition format for organization, style, and crediting sources including:
properly formatted header
12-point, double-spaced, Times New Roman font
use of in-text citations
title page and reference page
CLICK HERE AND ORDER NOW……………………….
Project Title
Write the name of your project....See topic Above
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This should be a half page detailed description of what exactly your Project is.
PROJECT RATIONALE
Two to three paragraphs stating the need for, and justification of, selecting this Project topic. Who will benefit and how will they benefit from this project? Who are the major stakeholders?
PERSONAL/PROFESSIONAL EXPECTATIONS
One to two paragraphs on what you hope to gain from this Project, both professionally and personally.
PROJECT GOALS
List and explain the goals of your Project. This section should address, in detail, a description of your project, what you plan to do and how you will achieve it.
PICO(T) Question
This should be a question that meets the criteria for PICO(T)
RESEARCH
Your project should also include a review of the existing research on your topic and a discussion comparing this research to your project focus. Knowing that you have already competed your literature review by this time, be sure to synthesize the research you presented in your presentation here. PLEASE USE THESE RESEARCH ARTICLES:
Boyd S, Aggarwal, Davey, Logan and Nathwani, (2011) Peripheral intravenous catheters: the road to quality improvement and safer patient care. Jan;77(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
Hasselberg, D., Ivarsson, B., Andersson, R., & Tingstedt, B. (2010). The handling of peripheral venous catheters - from non-compliance to evidence-based needs D Hasselberg et al. The handling of PVCs. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 19(23/24), 3358-3363. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03410.x
Ho, K., & Cheung, D. (2012). Guidelines on timing in replacing peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 21(11/12), 1499-1506. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03974.x
Rickard, C. M., Webster, J., Wallis, M. C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M. R., French, V., & ... Whitby, M. (2012). Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet, 380(9847), 1066-1074
Procedure
A step-by-step analysis of how you intend to meet your goals, including resources you will need, where you intend to find them, and an estimated timeline of how long each step will take. THIS A MAJOR SECTION OF YOUR PROPOSAL.
RECOMMENDATIONS
One half page to one whole page on your Project recommendations. By now, you have completed your proposal and have sifted through the literature. You should have a firm grasp on the problem and how you feel it should be solved, based on the evidence. You know you have a problem and you should discuss how you plan to solve it. Discuss those recommendations here.
EVALUATION
One half a page to one whole page on how your Project is to be evaluated. What specifically will make your project a success, both to you and to others? This won’t be a formal evaluation, but will simply be a plan of how you would evaluate, so just describe how you would evaluate this project for effectiveness if time permitted. Also, be sure to describe the purpose of your evaluation.
Format:
This paper should be formated in APA format with the topics of each section listed as a Level 2 heading (See APA manual, 6th Ed, page 62).
Before finalizing your work, you should:
be sure to read the Assignment description carefully
consult the Grading Rubric to make sure you have included everything necessary;
utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; and
review APA formatting and citation information
Your writing Assignment should:
have proper punctuation and grammar
be well organized, as well as original and insightful ;
contain excellent content, properly organized thoughts; and
use APA 6th edition format for organization, style, and crediting sources including:
properly formatted header
12-point, double-spaced, Times New Roman font
use of in-text citations
title page and reference page
Comments
Post a Comment