Skip to main content

PRACTICAL BOOK REVIEW OF PETERSEN TEXT INSTRUCTIONS A practical book review is a way of responding to readings, lectures, and life experiences that requires the learner to interact with new ideas and techniques on several levels.

PRACTICAL BOOK REVIEW OF PETERSEN TEXT INSTRUCTIONS A practical book review is a way of responding to readings, lectures, and life experiences that requires the learner to interact with new ideas and techniques on several levels. Your practical book review can be accomplished by thinking of four words: summarize, respond, reflect, and act. Use the following paragraphs and headings to complete your review.
SUMMARIZE! Give the current APA formatted reference of the book below the heading SUMMARIZE!. Summarize what you have read. Prove that you comprehend the material by writing a no-nonsense summary. SUMMARIZE! is not a commentary or a rehearsing of Petersen’s table of contents; rather, it is a gut-level, insightful overview of the longer, more elaborate book. It must provide a clear overview of the material. Keep this section to 500 words.
RESPOND! What parts of this book are about you? You will remember almost nothing you have read unless you make this critical, personal connection. Be transparent and get vulnerable with your answer. Relate a personal life episode that Petersen’s text triggered in your memory. What video memory began play back? Relate your story in first person and describe action; quote exact words you remember hearing or saying and/or the non-verbals on display in the memory. What was going on with your internal conversation during the story? In the teaching style of Jesus, this is a do-it-yourself parable, case study, and confession. Conversely, this is your chance to tell your story and make new ideas your own through a practical learning activity designed for you. Keep this section to 300 words.
REFLECT! What new questions or epiphanies popped up for you after reading the book and listening to Dr. Petersen’s comments? In the margins of the book, journal and become a meaning-making specialist. Clarify statements made with your situation/context in mind. Use questions like: “What bothers me about this book?” Or, use statements like: “I am reticent to accept … because …” or “This technique will help me to….” Also, what insight(s), technique(s), word pictures(s), and tool(s) are you seeing for the first time? Keep this section to 300 words.
ACT! So what are you going to do about it? What actions or changes are you going to make in your life as a result of this information? What techniques do you need to incorporate to improve your relational style? What tools (questions, word pictures, techniques, etc.) will you use to help a friend or a counselee to get unstuck and move towards meaningful change/solution? Where will you place these tools within the structure of your counseling scenario? Be specific as to what techniques you will use from the Petersen text. Keep this section to 500 words.
Note: Your grade on this review depends on the manner in which you address each of these 4 dimensions in graduate-level fashion and is according to the appropriate research writing guidelines of this class. A table of contents or reference page is not needed since the design of a practical book review provides the necessary information. However, a cover sheet or title page is needed. You must use the headings provided as your main headings and any sub-headers deemed necessary. If you are enrolled in a Counseling (COUN) or Human Services (HSCO) course, follow current APA guidelines.
The Practical Book Review of the Petersen Text is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 5.
Reference Petersen, J. C. (2007). Why don’t we listen better? Communicating & connecting in relationships. Tigard, OR: Petersen Publications. ISBN: 9780979155901.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom