Skip to main content

You can search for peer-reviewed journal articles, which you can find in the online journal databases and which can be accessed from the library homepage

Assessment Brief
Program Bachelor of Applied Social Science
Subject Applied Counselling Practice 3
Subject code COU204A
Name of assessment Assessment 3: Skills demonstration + reflective report
Length Skills demonstration (20 minute recording) + Reflective report (2,000 words)
Learning outcomes addressed by this assessment: B, C, D, E
Submission Date: End of week 11, Sunday 11.55 pm
Assessment brief summary: Students are required to present a recorded role play of a 20 minute counselling session presenting their counselling skills. Students are also required to reflect on their performance as a counsellor during this role-play.
Total marks 40: Part A – 10, Part B - 30
Weighting 40%
Part A – 10% (Recorded video session) Part B – 30% (Report)
Students are advised that any submissions mark e.g. a task marked out of 40 will incur
Please note: you must attempt
More information, please refer to the Academic quality/our-policies. past the due date incur a 10% penalty per day, calculated from the total a 4 mark penalty per day.
all tasks in a subject to be eligible to pass the subject.
Progression Policy on http://www.think.edu.au/about-think/think-
Assessment Description:
PART A
SKILLS DEMONSTRATION RECORDING – weight 10%
Students will be assessed on demonstration of advanced empathy and advanced counselling skills over the session with their ‘client’ by the lecturer. The session (20 minutes), will be recorded and submitted for marking together with assessment 2.
Marking Matrix:
Max. in
category Your
points
Student demonstrates an ability to develop and deepen the therapeutic relationship with the client by displaying positive regard, genuine respect, genuine warmth, non-judgmental attitude, empathy, and congruence. 3
Student shows a clear understanding of the client’s problem 3
Student shows attention to affect, content and the meaning. 2
Student demonstrates the use of a various counselling skills such as reflecting, use of open ended questions, summarising, clarification, etc. 1
Student uses effective body language 1
Total: 10
Comments:
PART B
REFLECTIVE REPORT – weight 30%
Students are required to write a reflective report that highlights:
1. Their overall reflection on the counselling process
2. Identification and discussion of the demonstrated counselling skills
3. Identification of areas for further development.
Your reflection needs to be linked to theoretical constructs.
Marking Matrix:
Max. in
category Your
points
Answering the question and responding to the topic 10
Links to theories and concepts 10
Number and choice of appropriate references 4
Word count, readability, and structure 3
In-text references and reference list 3
Total: 30
Comments:
Students must attempt all tasks in the unit to be eligible to pass the unit.
What we want to see:
The work must be fully referenced with in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We recommend you work with your Academic Writing Guide to ensure that you reference correctly. You will find a link to this document on the main page of every unit, under the 'Assessments' section. Correct academic writing and referencing are essential tasks that you need to learn. We recommend a minimum of four references.
Referencing: References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a reference, but not the Study Guide and lecture notes. We want to see evidence that you are capable of conducting your own research. Also, in order to help markers determine students’ understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number/s if shown in the original.
Researching: You can search for peer-reviewed journal articles, which you can find in the online journal databases and which can be accessed from the library homepage. Reputable news sites such as The Conversation (https://theconversation.com/au/health), online dictionaries and online encyclopedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic. Government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and local not for profit organisations such as the Cancer Council are also good resources.
Formatting: The assessment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Word.
What we don’t want to see:
Plagiarism: All sources of information need to properly be acknowledged. Please refer to the plagiarism website on blackboardi. By clicking the 'Upload this file' button you acknowledge that you have read, understood and can confirm that the work you are about to submit complies with the Flexible and Online plagiarism policy as shown in the JNI Student Handbook. Like other forms of cheating plagiarism is treated seriously. Plagiarising students will be referred to the Program Manager.
Word Count: Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count – as a general rule you may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
Late Submissions: Students are advised that any submissions past the due date incur a 10% penalty per day, calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 30 will incur 3 marks penalty per day.
No submission: Students must attempt all tasks to be eligible to pass the unit.
More information can be found in Think Education Assessment Policy document on the Think Education website.
Resources Available to YOU:
1. Academic writing guide link
https://laureate
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course id= 20163 1&content id= 2498847 1&mode=reset
2. Writing & referencing: The link to the Learning and Academic Skills Unit (LASU) is on the left pulldown menu on the blackboard home page:
https://laureate
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course id= 20163 1&content id= 2498847 1&mode=reset
LASU also provides a series of academic skills tutorials. Please contact Caroline Spaans (cspaans@laureate.net.au, 02 949 232 14).
3. Researching: A guide to researching is available on the library page http://library.think.edu.au/research skills/.
Please contact the online and Pyrmont librarian for Health, Dawn Vaux (dvaux@laureate.net.au) if you would like further help or a tutorial on how to do research this way.
ihttps://laureate-
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&content_id=_2498858_1&mode=reset

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom