Skip to main content

Was the project goal defined clearly? If not, discuss the areas for improvement.

Unit 1 Assignment: Project Need and Feasibility Focus
Paper
In this Assignment, you will be assessed based on the following outcome:
GM591-1: Determine the feasibility of projects.
The objective of this Assignment is an analysis of your selected project with recommended courses of
action to problems or issues you found, and to present the recommended courses of action.
Select a well-known project from the past (Pyramids, Eiffel Tower, Panama Canal, Suez Canal,
Chunnel, Golden Gate Bridge, etc.) and determine if the project should have been initiated. The
deliverable is a focus paper where you provide your recommendation. This focus paper should
include the following components of a business proposal and should be written in APA 6

The edition

formatting style:
Components
● Title page formatted in APA 6

The edition style with the following information: Title of the paper,

your name, course number and section number, and date.
● A table of contents using the following headers: Executive Summary, Introduction (3–5
sentences including thesis statement), Project Overview, Analysis of Project (Assess the core
project concept. Determine the costs and benefits of the project. Assess if the project scope,
risk, and strategy was defined clearly.), Recommendation and Course of Action, Conclusion
(4–8 sentences stating your recommended solutions in terms of project management
techniques and tools), and References.
● A minimum of three scholarly journal and textbook source references cited and credited
according to APA 6

the edition formatting style using a minimum of six in-text citations.
● The paper should be focused and to the point, containing between 600–800 words from the
Executive Summary to the end of your Conclusion.
As you write this focus paper, please consider the following:
 Was the project goal defined clearly? If not, discuss the areas for improvement.
 Did the sponsor provide the necessary funds? If not, how were the financial goals met?
 Was the scope defined thoroughly? Did the project experience scope creep?
 Were the project risks anticipated? Were there any Unknown Unknowns? In other words, were
some risks unexpected?
Checklist for Assignment
● Assess the core project concept
● Determine the costs and benefits of the project
● Assess if the project scope, risk, and strategy is defined clearly
● Evaluate the quality of research associated with presentation materials

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning
Post a Comment
Read more

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom
Post a Comment
Read more