Skip to main content

Episode must involve an RN – WHY? This is not saying you can’t see good/poor leadership or mentorship from an EN or AIN – but as you are about to graduate as a RN you need to focus on an RN


Assessment 2: Reflection on leadership

Using the Gibb's Model of Reflection students will reflect on their experiences on a previous placement with leadership or mentorship from a Registered Nurse and how they will integrate this in to their future nursing practice.
Length: 1000 words

Assessment 2: Reflection on leadership: TIP SHEET
General points
Word count = 1000 words
·         This means 1000 words +/- 10% so between approximately 900-1110 words
·         I have provided a guide to word counts in each section – this is a guide only
·         References and reference list are NOT included in the word count
Getting started
Your first step is to think of an episode on placement where you witnessed/experienced good or poor leadership or mentorship from a RN
Key words
·         Episode must involve an RN – WHY? This is not saying you can’t see good/poor leadership or mentorship from an EN or AIN – but as you are about to graduate as a RN you need to focus on an RN
·         Placement – this can be any placement you have been on during your nursing degree
o    NB: This is NOT to come from your work experiences – WHY? We are looking for your experiences as a student RN
·         Leadership – we have discussed leadership a lot in this subject so you should be aware what this encompasses
·         Mentorship – this is your experiences being mentored – i.e.: buddied with a RN
·         Good or poor experiences – you can use either – often we learn more from our poor experiences
·         Think of an episode where you experienced good leadership or mentorship – and what made it good – how this made you feel – you will unpack this using the reflective cycle with the aim to take the best elements – make sure they are grounded in evidence – and incorporate to your own practice
·         OR think of an episode where you experienced poor leadership or mentorship – and what made it bad  – how this made you feel – you will unpack this using the reflective cycle with the aim to take the best elements – make sure they are grounded in evidence – and incorporate to your own practice
Now review Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle as these are the headings that you will use in this assessment – there is a copy in assessment resources

1.       Description (approximately 250 words) 10 marks
·         Thinking of the episode you have chosen - describe this and tell us what happened.
·         This sets the scene for the rest of the assessment – so take your time to choose an appropriate episode
·         This is a narrative – to provide an overview of what happened
·         Be concise – don’t include superfluous information e.g. it isn’t a step-by-step guide to everything that happened on a shift
·         Not academic language – but please still use good grammar and spelling
·         You can use the first person – we want to see how you were involved
·         Make sure you provide specific detail –  don’t just provide generic details e.g. don’t just say the RN showed good mentorship by providing good communication – how did they do this? This is what you want to take away and learn from the encounter
·         NB: Don’t identify the RN or the facility this occurred at – this would be a reach of confidentiality
2.       Feelings (approximately 100 words) 10 marks  
·         Written in the first person
·         What were you thinking and feeling during this episode
·         Use descriptive and honest language – again this is not academic language
·         What impact did this have on you
·         Relate the feelings to what happened in the episode
e.g. “I felt a bit overwhelmed when the RN asked me to manage the situation but at the end of it I felt really proud of myself for stepping up”
OR “I felt really upset and disheartened when the RN made fun of my first attempt at a IMI”
3.       Evaluation (approximately 100 words) 10 marks
·         Based on what you have described above – in the narrative and your feelings section -what were the positive or negative aspects you can identify in the episode
·         This part is not analytical – you are making your own personal judgements about what you thought was good or poor
·         This can be written in the first person
4.       Analysis (approximately 250 words) 15 marks
·         What sense can you make of the situation?
·         This is building on your evaluation - reconsider the things that were good or poor
·         The aim is to explain the causes of things that happened – it asks the question why? E.g. so if mentoring was poor – why might that be the case? If you are saying you saw good leadership relate to the evidence on this
·         This part is analytical – it does not describe – so this is NOT in the first person
·         Use academic writing in this section
·         Here you will go to the literature to back up your argument – so articles on leadership or mentoring in nursing will help
·         Use in-text referencing in this section
·         Try and focus on the things that you think are the most important
·         It is better to write more and a couple of things than a little bit about a lot – you will be able to demonstrated your understanding more if you focus on a couple of points
5.       Conclusions (100 words) 10 marks
·         A summary of what you have learnt from this episode
·         This should be backed up with evidence
·         You can write this in the first person – but evidence still needs to be referenced
6.       Action Plan (100-200 words) 15 marks
·         As a result of this episode what specific actions will you now take in your future nursing practice
·         Choose 2 actions – make sure these are specific – number these as 1 and 2
·         A specific action is something like “I will ensure that I provide students with constructive and timely feedback” as opposed to “I will give feedback”
·         For each  provide a rationale – this is the why you are doing it – so this needs to be backed up with evidence
Reference list  5 marks
·         How many references? Minimum of 5 references
·         You are discussing nursing mentoring and leadership – so aim to use nursing journals
·         As always – peer reviewed journals are favoured
·         Harvard referencing at a 3rd year level
Academic literacy 5 marks
Writing at a 3rd year level expected

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom