Skip to main content

ThermoFisher KingFisher

 Clinical Laboratory Operations

Research Project

Directions

Objective: Compare the use, function, and specifications of two different analyzers.

Select two comparable (in terms of testing options) analyzers for comparison. Select something that is of interest to you! For example if you were interested in finding out more about nucleic acid extraction you could select the ThermoFisher Scientific KingFisher and the Aurora VERSA NAP.

Research both analyzers. You can find information out from manufacturers websites, published literature found in databases, and possibly textbooks. Regulatory agencies, such as CAP, may also have published information on specific analyzers. Information you need to find for both analyzers incudes:

· Principle of testing

· Types of specimens (i.e. plasma, whole blood, CSF)

· Sample Volume (how much sample is needed to run a test)

· Analysis Time (how long the test(s) take)

· Instrument Capacity (how many samples it can hold at a time)

· Test menu (what tests it can run. Ex: WBC, RBC, HGB, HCT, ect)

· QC, calibration, and maintenance requirements

· Sensitivity/Specificity (as applicable)

· Reportable Range, Precision, and Accuracy (as applicable)

In addition, you must also find one published article on a study that used the analyzer, and you must find an article for each analyzer you selected. Articles must be published within the last 10 years. For example, I would find a study that used the ThermoFisher KingFisher and another study that used the AURORA VERSA NAP.

What to submit:

A word document that includes the following:

· A written description/comparison of each analyzer, including at a minimum the above specifications. (This section should be at least 2 pages long)

· An article review/annotated bibliography for each published study

· A reference list for each source used (including sources used for the comparison)

· 12 point Arial or Calibri font, double-spaced, left justified, 1 inch margins

The document must be written with clear and succinct writing and must have appropriate spelling, punctuation, grammar etc.

GET THE COMPLETED ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT COMPLETED AT CapitalEssayWriting.com

MAKE YOUR ORDER AND GET THE COMPLETED ORDER

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT CapitalEssayWriting.com ON ThermoFisher KingFisher 

NO PLAGIARISM, Get impressive Grades in Your Academic Work

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning
Post a Comment
Read more

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom
Post a Comment
Read more