Skip to main content

fill up the journal template based on your seminars and lectures and your own research


Order Description
the journal template, lecture and the seminar will be uploaded . everything must be related to the lecture or seminar. To achieve a Pass with a mark of 40% to 59% for this element: You must satisfy these criteria: Learning Journal Entries Regular entries linked to lectures; Regular entries linked to additional tasks; Demonstrating development of knowledge; Reflection/Analysis Alluding to aspects already known; How knowledge or understanding has changed. To achieve a mark of 60% or over for this element: You must satisfy all the pass criteria plus: Learning Journal Entries Structured and clear entries; Indication of development of the students thinking and understanding; Modification and development of earlier ideas and understanding; Evidence of involvement in wiki based discussions; Reflection/Analysis Review of previous entries; Modification of earlier entries [showing how knowledge or understanding has changed]; Consideration of other arguments from wiki based discussions; Not taking facts at face value. To achieve a mark of over 70% for this element: you must satisfy all of the ‘60% or over’ criteria, and also: Learning Journal Entries Clarity in writing with conciseness of entries and related reflection; Critical consideration of earlier entries and opinions with suitable modifications; Links to earlier Journal entries; Use of practical examples to support thoughts and arguments; Evidence of reading, and sources outside of those set by the module team; Reflection/Analysis Show clear evidence of how your own ideas and critical thinking contribute to understanding of the topic(s); Develop a set of arguments that flow logically; Justification of arguments, with appropriate evidence/references; Clear evidence of analytical thinking. To achieve a mark of over 80% for this element: you must satisfy all of the ‘70% or over’ criteria, and also: Learning Journal Entries All of the elements form an appropriate, well presented, coherent and critical whole; Led wiki based discussions; Clear demonstration and evolution of understanding as the module and journal progress; Reflection/Analysis Show real insight into the issues
The week’s theme and/or themes:
Examples (& additional examples)
What did you already know?
What was new?
How have your views/knowledge changed?
Additional thoughts/observations research needed

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned
Post a Comment
Read more

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning
Post a Comment
Read more

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom
Post a Comment
Read more