Skip to main content

Early Researcher Awardees Statistics

Early Researcher Awardees Statistics since 2014

We have assessed all 450 ERA recipients from 2014 to 2018 and calculated how many years there between when the recipient completed their Ph.D., M.D., D.V.M. or equivalent and when their successful application for an ERA was made. For the purpose, we have to retrieve all of their applications in archive.

Findings:

Figure 1: Years from Ph.D. or equivalent for ERA awardees, 2014-2018

Figure 1 shows that among the three categories of years from Ph.D. or equivalent, the proportion of winners who are in the earliest career stages (less than 3 years from Ph.D.) have consistently remained low (around 10%) in recent years. The latest round of ERA (the results have yet to be made public) is down to a low of 6%. The proportion of winners in the middle (4-6 years from Ph.D.) has been higher in 2016 and 2017 although later career stage winners (7-10 years from Ph.D.) stood higher in the very recent round of ERA. On average, 8% of recipients were 1-3 years from receiving their Ph.D. or equivalent, 43% were 4-6 years from Ph.D. and 49% were 7 years or more from Ph.D.

 

 

 

 

Again, we have used the same 450 ERA awardees data and placed it into the more common definition of five years from Ph.D. or equivalent as found in other jurisdictions like Australia (Future Fellowships), European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grants) etc.

Figure 2: Years from Ph.D. or equivalent for ERA awardees, 2014-2018

Figure 2 shows that in recent years, those who were more than five years from Ph.D. or equivalent (69%) bagged the ERA award more (almost 3:1 ratio) than those who were less than five years from Ph.D. or equivalent (31%).

 

Key notes:

  • The number winners in earliest stage careers are significantly low (≤10%) in the most recent rounds of ERA.
  • Experienced ERA applicants who were more than five years from Ph.D. or equivalent are outperforming (3:1 ratio) the earliest stage career applicants who were less than five years from Ph.D. or equivalent.


Logo GET THIS PAPER COMPLETED FOR YOU FROM THE WRITING EXPERTS  CLICK HERE TO ORDER 100% ORIGINAL PAPERS AT PrimeWritersBay.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Identify and discuss a key milestone in the history of computers that interests you and why.

  Part 1Title: Lab ResponseDiscuss one feature of MS Word and one feature of MS Excel that you found challenging within the lab and why. Examples are WordArt, inserting shapes, adding borders, cell styles, etc. This response should be at least one paragraph in length. Part 2Title: History of Computers Identify and discuss a key milestone in the history of computers that interests you and why. This section should be at least one paragraph. Part 3Title: System Software vs. Application Software In your words, explain the difference between application software and system software as if to another coworker who has limited technical knowledge. Use examples to support your rationalization. This section should be at least two paragraphs. Part 4Title: Blockchain and Cryptocurrency In a minimum of one paragraph each: 1. Conduct some research on the internet and discuss one underlying technology of cryptocurrencies like blockchain, cryptography, distributed ledger technol...
Post a Comment
Read more

You have been given the t

PPMP20009 Leading Lean Projects Term 2, 2018 Page 1 of 3 Assessment 1 (Individual Work – 40%) Case study: Managing Lean Project Introduction You have been given the task to organise the FIFA 2018 World Cup football tournament ( https://ift.tt/2If0UDE ). (For those not familiar with football, you may change the event to the recently concluded 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games: https://gc2018.com/ ). Your tasks This assessment item requires you to work INDIVIDUALLY. 1. As the project manager in charge of delivering such as an important world sporting event: i. Identify and elaborate the following terms with regards to the event. a. Voice of the Customer (VOC) b. Critical to Customer Requirements (CCR) c. Critical to Quality parameters (CTQ) ii. In what ways would you have implemented lean project management for this event? Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK, PRINCE2, Organisational Project iii. Management Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Me...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security (CISA)

 Develop a research paper that identifies a specific Department of Homeland Security (DHS) operating agency. Fully describe 1 DHS operating agency from the following list: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security (CISA) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) U.S. Secret Service (USSS) Transportation Security Administration (TSA) The information must include a discussion of the selected DHS agency. Identify the agency’s mission, goals, objectives, and metrics. Conduct an analysis of how these mission areas address the threats or challenges. Recommend agency program priorities among the current set of goals, objectives, metrics, or budget items. Justification of all choices is an essential element of this assignment. Reference all source material and citations using APA format. WE OFF...
Post a Comment
Read more