Skip to main content

Develop an argumentative thesis that articulates a position on a significant issue

Ⅵ:
Writing Project 3: The Research-Based Argument

Final due: By the end of Week 5



Purpose

By the end of this writing project, you will be able to:

Develop an argumentative thesis that articulates a position on a significant issue
Use evidence from research to provide relevant background information, examples, and counter-arguments
Employ strategies of argumentation including making a claim, supporting claims with evidence, and identifying and engaging with alternative perspectives
Attribute and cite sources using signaling phrases, in-text citations, and a works cited page
Apply genre conventions for a research-based academic essay including structure, design, formatting, language usage, and mechanics
Compose a text using the writing process by drafting, reviewing, collaborating, revising, and editing
  

Task

Audience: Your English 102 instructor

Purpose: To make a persuasive claim about a significant issue and support your claim using evidence from sources

Genre: A research-based argument

Conventions: A 2,000-2,500 word research paper with MLA citation conventions for in-text citations and a works cite page

First Draft Due: Monday, by 11:59 p.m. 8/10/2020 La TIME ZONE



The research-based argument is the culmination of your semester-long research project. In this paper, you will make an argumentative claim on a significant topic; this claim should be developed and supported by summarizing, analyzing, and synthesizing perspectives from sources. You will demonstrate your skill in articulating complex ideas, examining claims and evidence found in your research materials, supporting your ideas with relevant reasons and examples, sustaining a coherent discussion, and employing rhetorical strategies to convince your readers to agree with your stand on the issue or at least to believe in the soundness and reasonableness of your position.



You will complete a required rough draft of your research-based argument. The draft should be at least 1,000 words long and should include a working introduction, your argumentative thesis, parts of your argument including the counterargument or alternative perspectives, and a working conclusion. As a draft, it is perfectly acceptable for sections to be incomplete or missing, but the more writing you provide, the more feedback you will receive that will strengthen your final paper. The draft will be graded as Complete/Incomplete. Your instructor will provide feedback on your rough draft that will help you revise your draft for the final assignment. If you do not turn in a rough draft, your final research-based argument will be penalized 20 points.

Consider the following questions as you write your research-based argument:

Author: How do you wish to represent yourself in your research-based argument, and how will you achieve that representation?
Purpose: Given that your purpose is to make a persuasive claim and support your claim using evidence from sources, how will you achieve this purpose in your research-based argument?
Audience: Given that your audience is your ENG 102 instructor, how will this audience inform the content, structure, and language of your research-based argument?
Genre: Given that your genre is a research-based argument, what are the genre conventions (structure, design, formatting, language usage, and mechanics) that you need to apply?
Content: What claim are you making in your research-based argument? How will you craft an effective argument and support your claim? How will you balance background information, examples, argument, and other perspectives in your paper?
Structure: How will you structure your research-based argument? What structure will help your audience understand your position and be persuaded by your argument?
Language: What linguistic choices will you make in your research-based argument? How formal or informal should your language be? How can you revise and edit your language to meet your rhetorical purpose in the genre?


Criteria

Your research-based argument will be evaluated according to the following criteria:

Rhetorical choices- Does the research-based argument effectively fulfill its purpose and appeal to the audience?
Content choices- Does the research-based argument make a clear, persuasive claim about a significant topic? Is the claim supported throughout the entire paper using evidence from sources? Are multiple perspectives on the topic, including counterarguments, discussed?
Genre choices- Does the research-based argument effectively apply genre conventions for an academic research paper?
Structural choices- Does the research-based argument introduction follow a logical arrangement?
Linguistic choices- Does the research-based argument use effective language for the genre and rhetorical situation?

  • Assignment statusSolved by our Writing Team at PrimeWritersBay.com
  •  
  • CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT PrimeWritersBay.com

  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

     Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

    Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

     Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

    CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

     Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom