Skip to main content

Creating a policy book for your organization or department

  • Unit 1 [GM592]
  • Page 1 of 2
  • Unit 1 Assignment: Scope Management______________
  • In this Assignment, you will be assessed based on the following outcome:
  • GM592-1: Plan scope management with associated communications.
  • This Assignment is designed to evaluate your ability to define the scope and create a work breakdown structure (WBS) for the project that you select. You will take the role of the project manager.
  • Here are the requirements:
  • ● Select a project that you would like to launch. This initiative should be a work-related project, such as the following: (1) creating a policy book for your organization or department, (2) opening a new office or market, (3) training staff members for the launch of a new product or service, (4) building an ecommerce site, (5) creating or enhancing an application or system, (6) launching a marketing campaign for an organization, (7) preparing for a major event, (8) building a new facility or structure, and so on. Please note that you will use this same project for other individual Assignments.
  • ● Create a detailed project scope statement.
  • ● Based on the project scope statement, create a work breakdown structure (WBS).
  • ● Please go to the internet for templates or documents that can help you meet the requirements.
  • ● The templates or documents that you use must meet all criteria specified in the grading rubric below.
  • Components
  • ● Title page formatted in APA 6th edition style with the following information: Title of the paper, your name, course number and section number, and date.
  • ● A table of contents using the following headers: Introduction, Project Scope Statement, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), Conclusion, and References.
  • ● A minimum of three scholarly journal and textbook source references cited and credited according to APA 6th edition formatting style using a minimum of six in-text citations.
  • ● The paper should be focused and to the point, containing between 600–800 words specific to the table of content items (excluding references).
  • Directions for Submitting your Assignment:
  • To submit your Unit 1 Assignment, upload to the Unit 1 Assignment Dropbox. Make sure that you have saved a copy of each of the files you submitted for this Assignment.
  • Unit 1 [GM592]
  • Page 2 of 2
  • GM592 Unit 1 Assignment: Scope Management Points
  • Possible
  • Points
  • Earned
  • Content (0-50 points)
  • 1. Project Scope Statement 25
  • Project scope description that is in more detail from the project charter.
  • Acceptance criteria specifying a set of conditions that must be met before
  • deliverables are accepted.
  • Project deliverables that correlate to the WBS tasks that is required to be
  • produced to complete the project’s product.
  • Project exclusion(s) that identify what is specifically excluded from the project
  • (What constitutes “out of scope”?).
  • A list and description of known constraints impacting scope.
  • A list and description of known assumptions impacting scope.
  • 2. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 25
  • A hierarchical decomposition of the total scope of the project to be carried out
  • by the project to accomplish project objectives according to required
  • deliverables.
  • Each descending level of work item, with the lowest level being the work
  • package, represents an increasing detail definition of the project work.
  • Work packages are accurate and assignable.
  • There are no overlaps in scope definition between components of the WBS.
  • Identify which elements of the WBS will be measured as a control account.
  • Control account have a control number that uniquely identifies it for
  • hierarchical summation of costs, schedule, and resource allocation.
  • Analysis (0-20 points)
  • Response exhibits strong higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g.,
  • evaluation). Paper shows original thought.
  • 7
  • Analysis includes proper classifications, explanations, comparisons and
  • inferences. 7
  • Critical thinking includes appropriate judgments, conclusions and assessment
  • based on evaluation and synthesis of information.
  • 6
  • Writing (0-15 points)
  • Grammatical skills are strong with typically less than one error per page.
  • Correct use of APA 6th edition.
  • 5
  • Appropriate to the Assignment, fresh (interesting to read), accurate, (no farfetched,
  • unsupported comments), precise (say what you mean), and concise
  • (not wordy).
  • 5
  • Paper is in 12-point font, and double-spaced with a double space between.
  • Paper is free of serious errors; grammar, punctuation, and spelling help to
  • clarify the meaning by following accepted conventions. At least three
  • scholarly journal and textbook sources are cited and referenced in APA 6th
  • edition format. Content is between 600–800 words specific to the table of
  • content items (excluding references).
  • 5
  • Total 85
  • Assignment statusSolved by our Writing Team at EssayCabinet.com
  •  
  • CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT EssayCabinet.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom