Skip to main content

Yezierska’s novel Bread Givers

L354 Guidelines for the Short Papers

The short papers should make an interpretive argument about a single text that we have studied this semester.  They should be from 1200-1500 words in length, double-spaced, and conform to MLA style.

The papers must have a clearly articulated thesis statement, which is supported by a close reading of the text, including relevant quotations.  Thesis statements must advance a particular interpretation of the text and not simply restate obvious features.  For instance, “Yezierska’s novel Bread Givers tells the story of a woman who rises in the world by gaining an education” would NOT be an acceptable thesis because it merely summarizes an aspect of the plot.  A good thesis provides room for argument, so that other readers might disagree with your interpretation.  For instance, someone could disagree with this thesis: “Although early in Yezierska’s novel Bread Givers, Sara seems to reject her Jewish heritage in favor of assimilation to American values and customs, by the end of the novel she acknowledges the importance of her heritage to her future, and she strives to reconcile Old and New World values.”  You don’t necessarily need to cram the whole thesis into a single sentence – you can spread it over two or three -- but you should make the thrust of your argument clear to the reader by the end of your second paragraph, at the latest.

No research is required for the short papers.  Instead, concentrate on building your own interpretation of the text.  If you do need to consult other sources, keep the references brief and cite the sources in MLA style.

Use quotes from the text to support your argument.  Cite key passages and then discuss them.  If something is worth quoting, it’s worth talking about.  Don’t ever fall into the trap of believing that “the quotes speak for themselves,” or somehow make your argument for you.  Use long quotes (over three lines) sparingly, and only when your reader needs to have the exact words in front of him to understand what you’re saying about the text.  As a rule of thumb, your comments after a quote should be at least as long as the quote itself.  If you don’t have that much to say about the quote, paraphrase part of it to provide context and only quote the key words.

Pay attention to the transitions between paragraphs.  Each transition should advance your argument by making a connection between the ideas in the two paragraphs.

The conclusion should do more than merely restate your thesis.  After all, the first time your readers saw your thesis we hadn’t read your paper.  By the end of the paper our understanding of your argument should be more nuanced, and the conclusion should reflect a deeper understanding of the text than was possible at the beginning.

I enjoy discussing possible paper topics and commenting on draft essays, and I’ll be happy to help you along the way, but you’ll need to take the initiative and ask for help.  See me before or after class, during office hours, or make an appointment.  If you have a draft, you can also send it to me by e-mail, and I’ll add marginal comments.  If you send me a draft a week in advance of the deadline, I’ll have comments to you in a day or two, and then you’ll have time to revise.


For more information on what I’ll be looking for and how your paper will be evaluated, consult the “Evaluation grid for the short paper” in canvas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom