Skip to main content

Demonstrate academic skills appropriate to the level of study.

ASSESSMENT BRIEF 1
Subject Code and Title
BIZ101: Business Communications
Assessment
Digital Resources Analysis
Individual/Group
Individual
Length
800 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes This assessment address the following subject learning outcomes:
a) Demonstrate academic skills appropriate to the level of study.
b) Demonstrate research skills and referencing appropriate to the level of study.
c) Critically analyse texts and/or multi- modal material in both a business and academic context.
Submission
Weighting
25%
Total Marks
100 marks
Context:
The assessment task requires you to search and locate five (5) sources in total that will be useful for completing your proposal and report for Assessment 2a and 2b.
At least three resources must be from reliable academic sources, such as articles or academic journals. The other sources can come from media sites, books, magazines, websites, YouTube and Tedtalks.
These resources must relate to your topic, which is on implementing a digital communication strategy within an organsiation. Therefore, it is important that you have thought about what type of strategy you wish to focus on before you start your research. If you are doing this in a group you must all agree on the topic, but the research is conducted individually.
BIZ101_Assessment 1_Digital Research_Module 2 Page 1 of 4
Some example topics you might like to research:
• Using Social Media in the workplace to communicate
• Communicating companywide employee recognition
• Boosting workplace motivation through innovative communication tools
• Implementing instant messaging/group messaging, discussion forums and chatrooms in the workplace
• Podcasts, internal blogs/vlogs as a means to communicate to employees
• Using an internal intranet/social Intranet for employee interaction
Instructions:
In this assessment, you must critically analyse each resource and justify why it would be of use to your assignment on identifying a communication strategy within an organsiation.
In a word or excel document please provide the following:-
1. Name of the resource (i.e. Communicating in the 21st Century)
2. Type of resource (i.e. website, article, video)
3. a) Write a brief summary on each of your resources justifying why you think they will be beneficial to your report.
b) Ensure you apply the five (5) Reliability test to each source.
(800 words in total for a) and b) +/- 10%).
4. Provide a full reference for each resource including a link following the APA referencing style.
Submitting Your Assessment
1. Check your originality by uploading your commentary to Turnitin.
2. When the Turnitin result is less than 20%, submit your assignment through the Assessment submission area.
BIZ101_Assessment 1_Digital Research_Module 2 Page 2 of 4
Learning Rubric
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Unacceptable)
(0-49%) Pass
(Functional)
(50-64%) Credit
(Proficient)
(65-74%) Distinction
(Advanced)
(75-84%) High Distinction
(Exceptional)
(85-100%)
Research 40 Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop topic idea.
Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop topic idea, but these are not always explicit or well developed.
Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop topic ideas.
Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of research and reading beyond the assessment expectations. Demonstrates expert use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources that will support and develop arguments. Shows extensive evidence of research and reading well beyond the assessment expectations.
Summarising resources
35 Limited understanding of topic researched and information presented does not show any evidence of evaluation and analysis of the resources.
Summary is poorly written with consistent grammatical errors Information is
communicated clearly with sufficient evidence of understanding of the researched sources, and information presented shows a fair attempt of providing evidence of evaluation and analysis of the resources.
Summary has minimal grammatical errors. Information is clearly communicated, and there is a good level of evidence in understanding the researched sources.
Information presented shows a good level of evaluation and analysis of the resources.
Summary has no grammatical errors. Information is consistently communicated, and there is
a high level of
demonstrated evidence in understanding the researched sources.
Information presented shows a high level of evaluation and analysis of the resources.
Summary has no grammatical errors. Information is consistently communicated, and there is expert use of demonstrated evidence of understanding the researched sources.
Information presented shows an expert evaluation
and analysis of the resources with some critical thinking applied.
Summary has no grammatical errors.
BIZ101_Assessment 1_Digital Research_Module 2 Page 3 of 4
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Unacceptable)
(0-49%) Pass
(Functional)
(50-64%) Credit (Proficient) (65-74%) Distinction
(Advanced)
(75-84%) High Distinction
(Exceptional)
(85-100%)
Referencing and
Reliability test 25 The five reliability tests have not been applied to the resources.
There are consistent mistakes in using the APA style for referencing.
The five reliability tests have been applied to the resources with some explanation.
There are minimal mistakes in using the APA style for referencing. A fair explanation for each of the five reliability tests have been applied to resources.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style for referencing. A good level of explanation
for each of the five reliability tests have been applied to resources.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style for referencing. An expert level of explanation for each of the five reliability tests have been applied to resources.
There are no mistakes in using the APA style for referencing.
BIZ101_Assessment 1_Digital Research_Module 2 Page 4 of 4
CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS……

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom