Skip to main content

The Facebook experiment of 2014 manipulated the contents of users’ News Feeds to induce changes in their emotions (Kramer et al., 2014)

Assignment 2 Instructions 
Due Date: (See Study Desk or Course Specification) 
Word Limit: 3,000 (+ / - 10%) 
Background 
The Facebook experiment of 2014 manipulated the contents of users’ News Feeds to induce changes in their emotions (Kramer et al., 2014). Facebook had tampered with the news feeds of nearly 700,000 people, showing them an abnormally low number of either positive or negative posts. The experiment aimed to determine whether the company could alter the emotional state of its users. The experiment was designed to assess whether more positive or negative comments in a Facebook newsfeed would impact how the user updated their own page. Researchers found those shown more negative comments posted more negative comments and vice versa. This experiment was widely criticized on ethical grounds regarding informed consent and other issues related to a poor Research Design. 
The Facebook Report 
Kramer, A., Guillory, J., & Hancock, J 2014, Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(24), 8788–8790. Available from http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full 
Your Task 
A different social network (XYZ) would also like to know if they could alter the emotional state of their users. Unlike Facebook, who wanted to know if more positive or negative comments in their New Feeds would impact how the user updated their own page, XYZ would like to know if different types of smells could impact how the user updated their own page. (Digital scent technology is in its infancy now but XYZ believes that as it develops there will be more interest in online scent marketing). 
You have been asked to do the research for them but they do not want to be accused of being unethical. They have asked you to do a Research Design so they can examine it before you begin your research. They do not want you to start the research until they approve the Research Design. 
Ethics in Research 
You must address the relevant ethical issues in your Research Design. Depending on the type of research you are designing you might discuss some of the following: 
• Informed participant consent 
• Voluntary participation and right of withdrawal without sanction 
• Confidentiality of participants and records 
• Secure storage of relevant data after completion of a research project 
• Clear, coherent expression of research proposals 
• Regular monitoring of research outcomes. 
• Privacy and the internet 
• Recruitment 
• Feedback to participants 
• Protection of participants 
• Deception 
• Honesty 
• Integrity 
• Bias 
• Respect for Intellectual Property 
• Carefulness 
• Objectivity 
• Codes and Policies for Research Ethics 
• Professional Conduct 
• Non-Discrimination 
• Legality 
• Human Subjects Protection 
Research design content 
Your Research Design should include the following elements: 
1. A brief introduction identifying the research question and the background for your report (keep this short and to the point). 
2. A short literature review or summary of secondary data from existing sources that relates to your research question (approximately 500 words). This literature review is specifically designed to provide background information on the issue (what we already know so that you can build on this knowledge); what previous research has been done in this area (what techniques and tools were used that you might also use); and what remains still unknown (the focus of this research). You should look to build on the research designs previously used in any existing studies. 
3. A statement of the research question(s) and objectives for this piece of research – what is it you intend this research program to achieve and what questions it will address – keep this focused and brief. 
4. A recommended research methodology justified and supported with appropriate theory (from the applied business research literature) and evidence that will best address the research question and provide answers to Company XYZ. This includes discussion about whether you are recommending a qualitative or quantitative approach (and why – justified and supported with theory), and within this what specific methods you are recommending (from the list of possible options) and why. 
5. Recommendations about the most appropriate sample unit and sampling methodology (also with justification) to match the design you are recommending and in this discussion show you have identified issues related to the research ethics of this proposed research and how you will address these. 
6. A discussion of the data (questions) that would need to be collected – being as specific as possible and showing evidence of an understanding of the form and level of data required to answer the research questions and how these ultimately will allow you to address the overarching research objective or question. 
7. A discussion of the type and level of analysis that should be conducted with this data to address the research questions (supported with theoretical justification) and 
8. A discussion about the validity and reliability elements of your proposed research plan and any limitations of the research that should be considered by Company XYZ when viewing your findings and suggestions. 
9. Finally, a summary statement about how this design will address the issue that Company XYZ is interested in exploring and will provide the answers to their questions – about one or two paragraphs at most. 
You DO NOT have to collect data, actually design a questionnaire or conduct any primary research for this assignment. 
Format of the Assignment 
This assignment is to be presented as a full formal report (including letter of transmittal, executive summary etc.) See the Communications Skills Handbook for more information if you are unsure of this format and the requirements. 
Suggested Structure for Assignment 2 
Letter of Transmittal 
Title page (Not included in word count) 
Table of Contents (Not included in word count) 
List of abbreviations and/or glossary if relevant (Not included in word count) 
Executive Summary 
Research Design 
A brief introduction identifying the research question and the background for your report (keep this short and to the point). 
Literature Review 
Statement of research question and objectives 
Research Methodology and Method(s) 
Sample unit and sampling methodology 
Discussion about Data 
Validity, Reliability, Limitations (If relevant) 
Summary statement / Recommendations (If relevant) 
Bibliography or Reference List - Harvard (Not included in word count) 
Appendices - If applicable (Not included in word count) 
Further information 
Please see the Resources section in Module 5 for a list of related readings and useful links.

Logo

Get 100% Original papers from the writing experts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community

 Discussion Forum: Counterarguments (Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community) You created a question about the topic for your W6 Rough Draft. For this discussion, you will give an answer to that question in the form of a thesis statement. "Dieting Makes People Fat" Main Post: Share your thesis statement with your classmates. Please note: As with last week’s discussion, nothing here is set in stone. Be open to changing everything about your topic, including your position and audience, as you research it and get feedback from your classmates. Topic + Position/Purpose + Supporting Points =Thesis Statement Example: Suppose the question you posed in the Week 5 discussion was something like, “Should pit bull terriers be banned in my community?” After doing some preliminary research, you have concluded that pit bulls, if raised properly, are no more dangerous than other breeds of dogs. Your thesis statement can be something like, “Pitbulls should not be banned

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Assignment: Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR  is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the  DSM-5-TR , and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder. In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders. Photo Credit: Getty Images/Wavebreak Media To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning

CYBER SECURITY and how it can impact today's healthcare system and the future

 Start by reading and following these instructions: Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Recommendations Document Due Week 6 (100 pts) Main Assignment Recommendations Document The 1250 to 1500-word deliverable for this week is an initial draft of your recommendations. Note that this is a working document and may be modified based on insights gained in module eight and your professor's feedback. This document should contain the following elements: Summary of your problem or opportunity definition A list of possible recommendation alternatives. In this section, you are not yet at the point of suggesting the best set of recommendations but you are trying to be creative and explore all the different ways that the problem or opportunity might best be addressed. The end result here will be a list of alternatives among which you will choose your final recom