Discussion Area at least one current-day advertisement where the Argument by Authority fallacy is present. Describe the syllogism that makes this a fallacy. Take care to be certain that you post an Argument by Authority fallacy only.
Discussion Area at least one current-day advertisement where the Argument by Authority fallacy is present. Describe the syllogism that makes this a fallacy. Take care to be certain that you post an Argument by Authority fallacy only.
________________________
NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHMENT FOR THE GRADING RUBIC FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT. And please make sure references are properly cited in APA 6 format.
Thanks in advanceDiscussion Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Initial Discussion Response 16
Discussion Participation 16
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship 8
Total: 40
Initial Discussion Response 16
Discussion Participation 16
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship 8
Total: 40
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Initial Discussion Response * Initial response:
Did not relate to the concepts or ideas presented in the discussion topic(s)
Claims were not supported.
Did not relate to the concepts or ideas presented in the discussion topic(s)
Claims were not supported.
Initial response:
Lacked substance
Was not original
Relied on personal experience only to support ideas
Lacked substance
Was not original
Relied on personal experience only to support ideas
Initial response was:
Original and accurate
Substantive
Demonstrated basic understanding of concepts
Discussed key theories and concepts from the readings
Initial response was:
Insightful
Original and accurate
Substantive and
Demonstrated advanced understanding of concepts
Compiled/synthesized theories and concepts drawn from a variety of sources to support statements and conclusions.
Discussion Participation *
Discussion Responses:
Were off-topic or irrelevant to discussion.
Original and accurate
Substantive
Demonstrated basic understanding of concepts
Discussed key theories and concepts from the readings
Initial response was:
Insightful
Original and accurate
Substantive and
Demonstrated advanced understanding of concepts
Compiled/synthesized theories and concepts drawn from a variety of sources to support statements and conclusions.
Discussion Participation *
Discussion Responses:
Were off-topic or irrelevant to discussion.
Discussion Responses:
Contributed a few points of view but mostly repeats information posted by others.
Contributed a few points of view but mostly repeats information posted by others.
Discussion Responses:
Contributed to the discussion offering points of view and/or opinions,
Did not make clear connections between one or more points in the discussion. Discussion Responses:
Offered points of view supported by research
Asked challenging questions that promoted discussion
Drew relationships between one or more points in the discussion.
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship *
Demonstrated little attempt to organize thoughts
Writing was not clear, concise and formal.
Writing contained numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interfered with readability and comprehension.
Information from sources was not paraphrased and attribution of sources was lacking.
Demonstrated some attempt to organize thoughts
Writing was not clear, concise and/or formal.
Errors in spelling and grammar somewhat interfered with readability and/or comprehension.
Information from sources was paraphrased and cited, but major errors were present.
Contributed to the discussion offering points of view and/or opinions,
Did not make clear connections between one or more points in the discussion. Discussion Responses:
Offered points of view supported by research
Asked challenging questions that promoted discussion
Drew relationships between one or more points in the discussion.
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship *
Demonstrated little attempt to organize thoughts
Writing was not clear, concise and formal.
Writing contained numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interfered with readability and comprehension.
Information from sources was not paraphrased and attribution of sources was lacking.
Demonstrated some attempt to organize thoughts
Writing was not clear, concise and/or formal.
Errors in spelling and grammar somewhat interfered with readability and/or comprehension.
Information from sources was paraphrased and cited, but major errors were present.
Wrote in a clear and organized manner
Writing was not concise or formal in language.
Writing followed conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors were infrequent and did not interfere with readability or comprehension.
Information from sources was paraphrased and cited, but minor errors were present. Wrote in a clear, concise, formal and organized manner.
Responses were error free.
Information from sources was paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.
Writing was not concise or formal in language.
Writing followed conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors were infrequent and did not interfere with readability or comprehension.
Information from sources was paraphrased and cited, but minor errors were present. Wrote in a clear, concise, formal and organized manner.
Responses were error free.
Information from sources was paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.
- CLICK HERE AND ORDER NOW……………………….
- Capitalessaywriting.com is a company which offers academic support and assistance to students. Our mission is to provide high quality academic services to our clients. This is done through quality writing and consistent follow-up of the students’ instructions. At Capitalessaywriting.com, we have highly qualified and competent writers to handle any of your projects. Our past quality projects and assignments ideally speak for themselves.
- CLICK HERE AND ORDER NOW……………………….
Comments
Post a Comment