please be sure to rely on credible, scholarly materials from the online
library. You will be selecting those materials for your Week 5 Annotated
Bibliography. Be sure to focus on cause and effect and analysis.
Try to avoid writing a play-by-play or a biography about the person. The
background is important-but the key is to focus on the impact and the
changes that took place here.
Instructions
Now that you have selected a topic for your final presentation, this
week you will need to construct your annotated bibliography using APA
style. For this assignment, you need to select a minimum of 8 sources
that you plan on using for your presentation and then construct the
annotations for each source. The concept of constructing a bibliography
is certainly not new for most students, but you may not be as
comfortable adding annotations to the bibliography entries.
After you select a source and reference it in APA format, construct the
annotation for the source. The annotation is really just answering a few
questions about the sources itself and once you answer these questions
this part of the assignment almost creates itself. Answer the following 6
questions for each source:
1.Main purpose of the source
2.Intended audience for the source
3.Relevance to your topic (or explain why it was not relevant to your
topic)
4.Author's background and credibility
5.Author's conclusions or observations
6.Your conclusions or observations
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 3-5 pages (not including title page or references page) 3 PAGES
NOT INCLUDING TITLE AND REFERENCE PAGE
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 8 scholarly sources)
Grading
This activity will be graded using the W5 Course Project Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 2, 3, 5, 8
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Rubric
Week 5 Course Project Grading Rubric
Week 5 Course Project Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 1
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 2
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 3
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 4
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 5
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 6
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 7
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Summary 8
7.0 pts
Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions, demonstrating
relevance and thorough understanding of the source.
5.75 pts
Includes annotation and your own conclusions, but needs additional
details to demonstrate relevance and/or thorough understanding of the
source.
4.25 pts
Annotation lacks details or is missing several aspects, showing unclear
understanding of the source and/or its relevance.
0.0 pts
No effort
7.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and
Reference Formatting
14.0 pts
All sources are properly cited in the text and references page
demonstrating a mastery of resource and APA citation reference format.
11.25 pts
Most sources are cited in the text and references page. Some minor
errors may exist in citation, but it does not interfere with
understanding the source of the information.
8.5 pts
Most sources are integrated, structured, and cited in the text and
references page. Some errors may exist in citation that need to be
addressed to clarify the source of information.
0.0 pts
Sources are not cited.
14.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Mechanics &
Usage
5.0 pts
The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that
would detract from a clear reading of the text.
4.0 pts
The writing contains some errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation
that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the text.
3.0 pts
The writing contains several errors in grammar, spelling, and
punctuation that impede a clear reading of the text.
0.0 pts
No effort
5.0 pts
Total Points: 80.0
PPMP20009 Leading Lean Projects Term 2, 2018 Page 1 of 3 Assessment 1 (Individual Work – 40%) Case study: Managing Lean Project Introduction You have been given the task to organise the FIFA 2018 World Cup football tournament ( https://ift.tt/2If0UDE ). (For those not familiar with football, you may change the event to the recently concluded 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games: https://gc2018.com/ ). Your tasks This assessment item requires you to work INDIVIDUALLY. 1. As the project manager in charge of delivering such as an important world sporting event: i. Identify and elaborate the following terms with regards to the event. a. Voice of the Customer (VOC) b. Critical to Customer Requirements (CCR) c. Critical to Quality parameters (CTQ) ii. In what ways would you have implemented lean project management for this event? Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK, PRINCE2, Organisational Project iii. Management Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Me...
Comments
Post a Comment